HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-ILPC-2025-08-19Approved on: 09/16/2025
Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC)
Minutes – August 19, 2025
Commission Member Present: Ed Finegan, Chair
Stephen Gibian, Member
Katelin Olson, Member
Avi Smith, Member
Absent:
David Kramer, Vice Chair
Janet Smith, Member
Susan Stein, Member
Common Council Members Present: None
City Staff Present: Bryan McCracken, Hist. Pres. and Neighborhood
Planner & Secretary, ILPC
_______________________________________________________________________
The regular monthly meeting of the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission was held in
Common Council Chambers, Third Floor, City Hall, 108 East Green Street, and conducted
remotely using videoconferencing technology. Virtual participation in public meetings is
authorized by Part WW of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2022 of New York State and Local Law
2022-05. The proceedings were livestreamed on the City of Ithaca Public Meetings channel on
YouTube and a recording is available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL99rYm-uGw
Chair E. Finegan called the meeting to order at 5:42 p.m. and read the Public Notice.
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. 200 Highland Avenue, Cornell Heights Historic District – Proposal to install a sign.
Gregory Turnbarello, Director of Operations, appeared on behalf of property owner, Modern
Living Rentals, to present the proposed sign installation project. 200 Highland Avenue is a
contributing resource in the locally designated Cornell Heights Historic District.
PUBLIC HEARING
On a motion by K. Olson, seconded by A. Smith, Chair E. Finegan opened the Public Hearing.
There being no members of the public appearing and wishing to speak, and no written comments
submitted to be read aloud, Chair E. Finegan closed the Public Hearing on a motion by A. Smith,
seconded by K. Olson.
Approved on: 09/16/2025
The Commission discussed the proposed sign’s materiality and size, noting how the Sign Ordinance may permit a sign that is larger than what is appropriate for a historic neighborhood.
The Commission discussed simplifying existing sign information to allow for a smaller sign and
expressed a strong preference for the brushed aluminum material, noting that its simple, unobtrusive design would be compatible with its historic environment. Additionally, the Commission noted that size and placement of residential real estate signs are considered by the Commission on a case-by-case, property-by-property basis.
In summary, the Commission determined that the most appropriate size for this sign based on its
context is 2’x3’.
RESOLUTION: 200 Highland Avenue, Cornell Heights Historic District – Proposal to install a sign
WHEREAS, 200 Highland Avenue is located within the Cornell Heights Historic District, as
designated under Section 228-3 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code in 1989, and
as listed on the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places in 1989,
and
WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, an Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness, dated June 6, 2025, was submitted for review to the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) by Greg Tumberello on behalf of property owner Modern Living Rentals, including the following: (1) two narratives respectively titled Description of Proposed Change(s) and Reasons for Changes(s); (2) a photograph of the exterior of the building with three locations
identified for the proposed sign; (3) an example of a proposed brushed aluminum sign; (4) an example of a PVC sign; and (5) two photographs document existing conditions, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed the New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form
for 200 Highland Avenue, and the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic
District Summary Statement, and
WHEREAS, as stated in the narrative Description of Proposed Change(s), the project involves
the installation of a 4’X3’ wall-mounted sign, and
WHEREAS, the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness is a Type II Action under the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance for which no further environmental review is required,
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate
impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing for the purpose of considering approval of the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC meeting on August 19, 2025, now therefore be it
Approved on: 09/16/2025
RESOLVED, that the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and
the proposal:
As identified in the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic District Summary
Statement, the period of significance for the area now known as the Cornell
Heights Historic District is 1898-1937.
As indicated in the New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form, the
Queen Anne Style residence at 200 Highland Avenue was constructed ca 1905.
Constructed within the period of significance of the Cornell Heights Historic District and possessing a high level of integrity, the property is a contributing element of the Cornell Heights Historic District.
The proposal under consideration impacts the large, non-historic addition constructed in 2024. In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction, or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-6 of the Municipal Code. In making this determination, the Commission is guided by the
principles set forth in Section 228-6B of the Municipal Code, as further elaborated in Section 228-6C, and by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, and in this case specifically the following principles and Standards:
Principle #2 The historic features of a property located within, and contributing to the significance of, an historic district shall be altered as little as possible and any alterations made shall be compatible with both the historic character of the individual property and the character of the district as a whole.
Standard #2 The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property will be avoided.
Standard #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the
Approved on: 09/16/2025
massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.
Standard #10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.
With respect to Principle #2, Standard #2, and Standard #9, the proposed sign will not remove distinctive materials and will not alter features and spaces that characterize the property.
Also with respect to Principle #2 and Standard #9, the proposed sign is
compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features of the property and its environment. With respect to Standard #10, the sign can be removed in the future without
impairment of the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its
environment. RESOLVED, that, based on the findings set forth above, the proposal will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance
of the Cornell Heights Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-6, and be it
further,
RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal meets criteria for approval under Section 228-6 of the Municipal Code, and be it
further
RESOLVED, that the ILPC approves the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness with the following condition(s):
• The size of the sign shall be 3’x2’;
• The sign shall be brushed aluminum; and
• The sign shall be placed in location “1” identified in the photograph submitted with the Certificate of Appropriateness Application. The location next to the
primary entrance door reflects traditional placement patterns for signs in
historic neighborhoods.
RECORD OF VOTE:
Moved by: A. Smith
Seconded by: K. Olson
In Favor: A. Smith, K. Olson, E. Finegan, S. Gibian
Against: 0
Abstain: 0
Absent: D. Kramer, J. Smith. S. Stein
Vacancies: 0
Approved on: 09/16/2025
B. 308 Stewart Avenue, East Hill Historic District – Proposal to install a sign.
B. McCracken, ILPC staff, presented the proposed sign project on behalf of the applicant,
Ashmir Zephyr Sanchez. 308 Stewart Avenue is a contributing resource in the locally designated
East Hill Historic District.
B. McCracken summarized the proposal and responded to the Commission’s questions about the
property’s existing signage and the proposed installation method for the metal bracket.
PUBLIC HEARING
On a motion by A. Smith, seconded by K. Olson, Chair E. Finegan opened the Public Hearing.
There being no members of the public appearing and wishing to speak, and no written comments
submitted to be read aloud, Chair E. Finegan closed the Public Hearing on a motion by K. Olson,
seconded by S. Stein.
B. McCracken recommended placing a condition on the approval requiring the sign bracket to be
mounted into the brick mortar joints, minimizing potential damage to the historic bricks.
presented in application.
RESOLUTION: 308 Stewart Avenue, East Hill Historic District – Proposal to install a sign
WHEREAS, 308 Stewart Avenue is located in the East Hill Historic District, as designated
under Section 228-3 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code in 1988, and as listed
on the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places in 1986, and
WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, an Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, dated April 11, 2025, was submitted for review to
the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) by Ashmir Zephyr
Sanchez and El Chamo Bar and Grill, including the following: (1) two narratives respectively titled Description of Proposed Change(s) and Reasons for Changes(s); (2) two photographs of the proposed sign; and (3) a rendering of the sign installed on the building, and
WHEREAS, the ILPC has also reviewed the New York State Building-Structure Inventory
Form for 308 Stewart Avenue, and the City of Ithaca’s East Hill Historic District
Summary Statement, and
WHEREAS, as stated in the narrative Description of Proposed Change(s), the project involves
the installation of an 11”X19” wood sign suspended 10’ above the public
sidewalk on a projecting metal bracket, and
Approved on: 09/16/2025
WHEREAS, the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness is a Type II Action under the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance for which no further environmental review is required,
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate
impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing for the purpose of considering approval of the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC
meeting on August 19, 2025, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and
the proposal:
As identified in the City of Ithaca’s East Hill Historic District Summary
Statement, the period of significance for the area now known as the East Hill
Historic District is 1830-1932.
As indicated in the New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form, the
Italian Renaissance Revival Style commercial building at 308 Stewart Avenue
was constructed ca 1915.
Constructed within the period of significance of the East Hill Historic District and possessing a high level of integrity, the property is a contributing element of the East Hill Historic District.
In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction, or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring
improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-6 of the Municipal Code. In making this determination, the Commission is guided by the principles set
forth in Section 228-6B of the Municipal Code, as further elaborated in Section 228-6C, and by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, and in this case specifically the following principles and Standards: Principle #2 The historic features of a property located within, and
contributing to the significance of, an historic district shall be altered as little as possible and any alterations made shall be compatible with both the historic character of the individual property and the character of the district as a whole.
Approved on: 09/16/2025
Standard #2 The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features and
spaces that characterize a property will be avoided. Standard #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the
massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Standard #10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential
form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. With respect to Principle #2, Standard #2, and Standard #9, the proposed sign will not remove distinctive materials and will not alter features and spaces that
characterize the property.
Also with respect to Principle #2 and Standard #9, the proposed sign is compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features of the property and its environment.
With respect to Standard #10, the sign can be removed in the future without impairment of the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment.
RESOLVED, that, based on the findings set forth above, the proposal will not have a substantial
adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the 308 Stewart Avenue and the East Hill Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-6, and be it further,
RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal
meets criteria for approval under Section 228-6 of the Municipal Code, and be it further RESOLVED, that the ILPC approves the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness with
the following condition(s):
• The metal support bracket shall be anchored into the mortar joints to prevent short- and long-term damage to the historic brick.
RECORD OF VOTE:
Moved by: K. Olson
Seconded by: S. Gibian
In Favor: E. Finegan, A. Smith, K. Olson, S. Gibian
Approved on: 09/16/2025
Against: 0
Abstain: 0
Absent: D. Kramer, J. Smith, S. Stein
Vacancies: 0
C. 102 Triphammer Road, Cornell Heights Historic District – Proposal to replace
windows.
Property owner, Alex Susskind, and Renewal by Andersen representatives, Mark Rudy, Design
Specialist, and Andrew Charney, Installation Project Manager, appeared before the Commission
to present the proposed window replacement project. 102 Triphammer Road is contributing
resource in the locally designated Cornell Heights Historic District.
A. Susskind summarized the proposal to replace all the windows on the first floor of the
residence, emphasizing the existing window’s condition and operability issues. M. Rudy
described the proposed replacement units, the plan to replicate as many of the original windows’
design details as possible and the proposed installation technique.
The Commission questioned whether the condition of the existing windows was sufficiently
assessed and requested a site visit to independently examine the deterioration to determine if
replacement is necessary. Members also questioned the mullion detailing of the proposed
ganged windows and whether it sufficiently replicated the depth of the existing mullions, an
important character-defining feature of the existing units.
The Commission tabled the application to allow for a site visit within the coming month to assess
the condition of the existing windows.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
No draft minutes were reviewed by the Commission.
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
• Review: Staff Comments on the West State Street Apartments Project
B. McCracken summarized staff’s comments (attached) on the proposed development and its
potential impacts on adjacent historic resources. L. “Bear” Smith, Project Manager at HOLT
Architects, from the development team also appeared before the Commission to address
questions and design concerns. The Commission questioned the building’s color scheme and
compatibility of the fiber cement panels on the west elevation with the material quality of the
Downtown West Historic District. B. Smith explained that the varied color scheme reflects the
design team’s attempt to the breakdown the larger building into smaller modules. He also
explained the use of the fiber cement panels on the west elevation, noting that the material is a
better substrate of murals and more affordable than brick.
Approved on: 09/16/2025
On a motion by K. Olson, second by S. Gibian, the Commission voted to endorse staff’s
comments on the West State Street Development Project.
RECORD OF VOTE:
Moved by: K. Olson
Seconded by: S. Gibian
In Favor: E. Finegan, A. Smith, K. Olson, S. Stein
Against: 0
Abstain: 0
Absent: D. Kramer, J. Smith, S. Stein
Vacancies: 0
• ILPC Retreat
The Commission discussed scheduling a retreat to discuss design review considerations related
to the replacement of windows.
V. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by A. Smith, seconded by K. Olson, the meeting was adjourned unanimously at
7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Bryan McCracken,
Historic Preservation and Neighborhood Planner
Secretary, Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission