HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-CC-2025-02-05YouTube Link:https://tinyurl.com/mr34ez9h
Date:
Location:
Wednesday February 5, 2025
City Hall Council Chambers
2-5-2025 COMMON COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Voting Record
1.Call to Order
1.1 Emergency Evacuation
1.2 Agenda Review
1.3 Reports From Municipal Officials
Attendance Record of Voting Members
Name Present Absent/Excused
Mayor - Robert Cantelmo X
1st Ward - Kayla Matos X
1st Ward - Phoebe Brown X
2nd Ward - Ducson Nguyen X
2nd Ward - Kris Haines-Sharp X
3rd Ward - David Shapiro X
3rd Ward - Pierre Saint-Perez X
4th Ward - Patrick Kuehl X
4th Ward - Tiffany Kumar X
5th Ward - Margaret Fabrizio X
5th Ward - Clyde Lederman X
Discussion Summary: The February 5th 2025 meeting of the Ithaca Common Council has
been called to order. All members of Council are present for the meeting. Timestamp
1:01-1:07
Discussion Summary: The Emergency Evacuation Notice is read for members of
the public in attendance. Mayor Cantelmo acknowledged events that took place in
the City of Ithaca involving the presence of Federal Law Enforcement and Federal
Immigration Officers executing an arrest warrant and addressed the concern and
fear caused in the community by their tactics. Mayor Cantelmo. Timestamp 1:12-
3:35
Discussion Summary: Mayor Cantelmo added appointments to the Controller
Search Group, appointments to the Superintendent of Public Works Search group,
and the new staff appointment to the Ethics Advisory Board to the agenda.
Timestamp 3:38- 4:16
Discussion Summary: Report from Tompkins County Legislator Veronica Pillar.
Timestamp 4:21-9:37
2.Proclamations and Awards
3.Review and Approval of Minutes
3.1 1-8-25 CC Minutes, 1-15-25 COW minutes, 1-22-25 COW Minutes
4.Petitions and Hearings of Persons Before Council
4.1 Public Hearing- A Local Law Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City
Code, "Disability Exemption"
Discussion Summary: No Proclamations or Awards were presented.
Discussion Summary: Minutes from the January 2025 Common Council and Committee of
the Whole Meetings were approved. Alderperson Kuehl is temporarily away from the vote
to participate in Statements from the Public. Timestamp 9:41-9:54
Moved By: Pierre Saint-Perez
Seconded By: David Shapiro
Motion Summary: Approval of the 1-8-25 Common Council Minutes, 1-15-25 COW
Meeting Minutes, and the 1-22-25 COW Meeting Minutes. Moved by Alderperson
Saint-Perez, seconded by Alderperson. The vote carried 10-0 with alderperson
Kuehl temporarily away from the vote.
Vote Passed 10-0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Oppose Recuse
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Discussion Summary: A Public Hearing was held on the Local Law Amending the
City Code on Tax Exemptions for Persons with Disabilities. Timestamp 9:59-10:26
Moved By: Clyde Lederman
Seconded By: Tiffany Kumar
Motion Summary: Motion to Open the Public Hearing; moved by Alderperson
Lederman, and seconded by Alderperson Kumar, the vote carried 10-0 with
Alderperson Kuehl away from the vote.
Vote Passed 10-0 Carried Unanimously
4.2 Statements from the Public
Member Approve Oppose Recuse
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Moved By: Kayla Matos
Seconded By: Tiffany Kumar
Motion Summary: Motion to Close the Public; moved by Alderperson Matos, and
seconded by Alderperson Kumar, the vote carried 10-0 with Alderperson Kuehl
away from the vote.
Vote Passed 10-0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Oppose Recuse
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Discussion Summary: Members of the public came out to talk to share their
thoughts and concerns about the following topics, due to the number of speakers
present, each speaker was allowed 2 minutes to comment. *Written comments
have been included and affixed in the minutes. Timestamp 10:27-1:06:12
Sanctuary City Policy
Housing
EMS Response
The Presence of ICE
Audits
Homeless Camps
Squeaky Clean Carwash
The Death of Roland Hoyt: Proposal for Mobile Warming Stations
LGBTQ Concerns
Public Employees
4.3 Privilege Of The Floor- Comments From Council and The Mayor
5.Consent Agenda
Discussion Summary: Council members thanked all who came out to speak.
Council responded to the City Residents and community members who spoke to
the ICE events taking place in the city and reaffirming Ithaca as a Sanctuary City.
The mayor shared with the public a memo received during the meeting, from the
United States Attorney General's Office announcing to defunding any State and
Local Jurisdictions unlawfully interfering with federal law enforcement operations
Timestamp 1:06:14- 1:23:50
Discussion Summary: Mayor Cantelmo asked for a motion to move Consent Agenda items
5.1-5.3 which includes the Sanctuary City resolution. Alderperson Saint-Perez moved for
a 5 minute Recess to allow members of the public the opportunity to clear the room after.
Council was asked to remain seated. Timestamp 1:23:55- 1:24:37
Moved By: Pierre Saint-Perez
Seconded By: Kris Haines-Sharp
Motion Summary: Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Items 5.1-5.3. Moved by
Alderperson Saint-Perez and seconded by Alderperson Matos. Consent agenda passed
unanimously 11-0.
Vote Passed 11-0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Oppose Abstain
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Moved By: Pierre Saint-Perez
Seconded By: Kayla Matos
Motion Summary: 5 Minute Recess. Moved by Alderperson Saint-Perez, Seconded by
Alderperson Matos. Motion carried 10-1 with Alderperson Kuehl against.
Vote Passed 10-1
5.1 A Resolution to Declare Lead Agency- 200 Block of Cecil A. Malone Drive
Sidewalk Construction
5.2 Cargill Environmental Impact Statement
5.3 Resolution- Ithaca a Sanctuary City
6.New Business / Member Filed
6.1 Local Law- Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code "Disability
Exemption"
Member Approve Oppose Abstain
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Discussion Summary: Local law was moved and summarized by Alderperson
Lederman. No further discussion on the Local Law. Mayor Cantelmo called a Roll
Call vote. Timestamp 1:29:46-1:30:48
Moved By: Clyde Lederman
Seconded By: Kayla Matos
Motion Summary: Motion to approve Local Law- Amending Article V of Chapter 300
of the Ithaca City Code "Disability Exemption". Moved by Alderperson Lederman
Seconded by Alderperson Matos. Carried Unanimously 11-0 by Roll Call Vote.
Vote Passed 11-0 Carried Unanimously
6.2 Ordinance-Amending Article I of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code, "Senior
Citizens Exemption"
7.Mayor Appointments
7.1 Advisory Committee on Encampment Response Protocol
Member Approve Oppose Recuse
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Discussion Summary: Ordinance was moved and summarized by Alderperson
Saint-Perez. Not further discussion on the motion. Timestamp 1:30:52-1:31:16
Moved By: Pierre Saint-Perez
Seconded By: Margaret Fabrizio
Motion Summary: Motion to approve Ordinance-Amending Article I of Chapter 300 of
the Ithaca City Code, "Senior Citizens Exemption". Moved by Alderperson Saint-
Perez, Seconded by Alderperson Fabrizio; Carried Unanimously 11-0.
Vote Passed 11-0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Oppose Recuse
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Discussion Summary: Mayor Cantelmo noted that the Advisory Ad Hoc
Committee was established at a previous council meeting and is here for
information purposes only. Alderperson Saint-Perez pointed out that the initial
declaration had a "To Be Announced" member and asked that the identity of that
7.2 Recommendation To TCAT
member be made public. Mayor Cantelmo then turned the discussion over to the
City Manager who identified the new Response Encampment Coordinator as Kanij
Fateema Timestamp 1:31:16-1:32:26
Discussion Summary: Mayor Cantelmo recommends Professor Nick Klein, a
transportation professor at Cornell University and resident of Fall Creek to fill a
vacancy on the TCAT board representing the city for a three-year term expiring
December 31, 2027, Timestamp 1:32:27-1:32:48
Moved By: Robert Cantelmo
Seconded By:
Motion Summary: Motion to Recommend Professor Nick Klein to Tompkins County
Consolidated Area Transit Board. Moved by Mayor Cantelmo with no formal
second. All in Favor of recommendation. Carries Unanimously 11-0
Vote Passed 11-0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Oppose Recuse
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
7.3 Appointment to the Search Committee
Discussion Summary: Mayor Cantelmo appointed himself, Alderperson Nguyen, and
Alderperson Fabrizio to the Search Committee for City Controller. Alderpersons
Lederman, Saint-Perez, and Haines-Sharp are appointed to the Superintendent of
Public Works search committee. Timestamp 1:32:54- 1:33:30
Moved By: Robert Cantelmo
Seconded By:
Motion Summary: Moved as a batch- move to appoint Mayor Cantelmo, Alderperson
Nguyen, and Alderperson Fabrizio to the City Controller's Search Committee.
Motion to appoint Alderperson Lederman, Alderperson Saint-Perez, and Alderperson
Haines-Sharp to the Superintendent of Public's Work Search Committee. Moved by
8.Report of the City Manager
8.1 City Manager's Report- February 2025
Mayor Cantelmo, with no formal second. All in favor. Motion carried Unanimously 11-0
Vote Passed 11-0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Deny Recuse
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
7.4 Appointment to the Ethics Advisory Board
Discussion Summary: Lisa Nicholas is appointed to the Ethics Advisory Board.
Timestamp 1:33:33-1:34:26
Moved By: Robert Cantelmo
Seconded By:
Motion Summary: Move to appoint Lisa Nicholas to the Ethics Advisory Board. Moved by
Mayor Cantelmo no formal second. Motion carries 10-1 with Alderperson Brown
against.
Vote Passed 10-1
Member Approve Deny Recuse
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Discussion Summary: The City Manager's Report will be discussed at the next
9.Report of the City Controller
9.1 ARPA UPDATE
10.Executive Session (If Needed)
Committee Meeting. Timestamp 1:34:34-1:36:42
Moved By: Patrick Kuehl
Seconded By:
Motion Summary: Alderperson Kuehl Motioned to Reconsider the appointment of
Lisa Nicholas to the Advisory Board. No second to the motion, motion failed.
Vote Lack of Second -0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Oppose Recuse
Discussion Summary: No discussion on Report. Discussion and questions from Council will
be considered at the next Committee meeting.
Discussion Summary: Written report provided to Council.
Discussion Summary: City Attorney Kessler informed Council there is a need for an
Executive Session. Council moved into Executive Session. Council will not be returning
with a vote at this time. The meeting adjourned after the mayor took the vote to move into
Executive Session. Timestamp 1:36:51- 1:37:54
Moved By: Pierre Saint-Perez
Seconded By: Kayla Matos
Motion Summary: Motion to move into executive session to discuss potential real estate
transaction. Moved by Alderperson Saint-Perez Seconded by Alderperson Matos.
Vote Passed 11-0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Oppose Abstain
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Moved By: Pierre Saint-Perez
Seconded By: Kayla Matos
11.Meeting Wrap Up
Motion Summary: Motion to Exit Executive Session. Moved by Alderperson Saint-Perez,
Seconded by Alderperson Matos. Motion carried Unanimously 11-0
Vote Passed 11-0 Carried Unanimously
Member Approve Oppose Abstain
Robert Cantelmo X
Kayla Matos X
Phoebe Brown X
Ducson Nguyen X
Kris Haines-Sharp X
David Shapiro X
Pierre Saint-Perez X
Patrick Kuehl X
Tiffany Kumar X
Margaret Fabrizio X
Clyde Lederman X
Discussion Summary: * Common Council resumed its proceedings with an additional
motion following the executive session The discussion was not livestreamed to
YouTube, but a transcript of an audio recording of the proceedings follows.
February 5th 2025
Alderperson Kuehl moved to reconsider the appointment of Lisa Nicholas to the Ethics Advisory Board,
Seconded by Alderperson Fabrizio. Council commenced debate on the motion to reconsider. The audio
recording begins with Alderperson Kuehl…
Alderperson Kuehl- “….. with appointing a senior staff to oversee the ethics advisory board of
Common Council I think we’ve already seen this city [Mayor Cantelmo- “of the city” ]…of the city,
Thank you, First of all I think we’ve already seen this year that, right or wrong and I choose to believe
right , that we’ve had members of senior staff including the person we are appointing to the ethics
advisory board, come and speak on topics against members of Council. And regardless of whether
senior staff members should be appointed, which I disagree with, the ethics code says “Qualification:
members of the board shall be chosen for their independence, mainly that’s the best big point, their
integrity, civic commitment, and high ethical standards, and I think the other ones are totally applicable,
but the person we’re appointing, and again I really like this person, I think they do great work, I think
they’re a wonderful asset and the number of our city staff, but I do have serious, serious concerns and
I’m sorry that I had to do this whole procedural thing it just went right over my head at the moment, I
didn’t see it on the agenda. I don’t know if it’s on the agenda, but umm that’s my point.”
Mayor Cantelmo- “Two things, One, this is the ethics advisory Board for the whole city, not the
Council, which we did clarify but I want to just….so if the claim is that the independence has to be of
anyone affiliated with the City, I would argue that you’re correct in the normative position that you hold
that is shouldn’t be any staff members but I do want to say it is nothing t do with just Council, and then I
would also say that I have kind of limited patience personally for this body again preventing the
functioning of government like it does with the building fees which cant proceed until we have those in
place, as the alderperson noted we cannot have our ethics advisory board meet nor can we have our
can we have our disclosure forms reviewed until we have a quorum. Margaret…”
Alderperson Fabrizio- …. “ Thank you Patrick for bringing that up and taking the initiative to find that. I
would echo those concerns and Patrick said rightly or wrongly, I would say wrongly. I felt I was publicly
called out by senior members of staff….I don’t think that should have been allowed.. for something…
[ Mayor Cantelmo: “First Amendment] I didn’t even do and I was not allowed to even correct the record
and I don’t I don’t feel like that was just something that should have happened I mean in terms of how
professional performance happens and about collaboration and relationship building I think…
Mayor Cantelmo- “ I want to be really clear we’re talking about the nomination and the First
Amendment rights of the individual are not something that can be up for debate….[City Manager
Mohlenhoff: “I’m also concerned you’re not publicly being aired [Mayor Cantelmo: “I agree”]…So you
can just table this]…. but they, they have to, I mean this vote would have to be, this motion to
reconsider would have to pass which is the thing we that we are debating right now, so if the Motion to
reconsider fails then this conversation is over and then if the motion to reconsider passes you can move
to table the appointment but I’m with the city manager this is wildly inappropriate to be talking about
without any public engagement….[ City Attorney: “But Clyde is recording for the record ]….Okay thank
you.
Alderperson Kuehl- “I would just like to say first of all it is fully within our power per the Charter that we
can vote on this. That it is perfectly within our power to reject your appointment…[Mayor Cantelmo-
“yeah that’s not what I said”] saying that we reject an appointment is slowing or somehow on us for or
railroading government or whatever, I don’t remember exactly what you said but I think that’s like a
crazy accusation, second of all I agree with you this should have been on air. I am also looking at the
agenda and it is not on the agenda, and again, I should have been more aware that this was happening,
but there was no way for me to prepare comments about this because there are two Mayor
Appointments to this on the agenda and this is not one of them.
Audio Transcript
Alderperson Brown- Yeah no, I just needed to, I voted, I voted down because I feel like we’re
constantly being told how we don’t work close, we don’t work with the city employees and back and
forth, but I’m feeling very much like, to hear your frustration and your impatience with us is also very
daunting for me as a council member right, and to feel as if Lisa Nichols, who Iove dearly and she is
amazing at her job. Could we share with somebody, is this the only person that came up to do this?
Mayor Cantelmo- We have been trying to fill these two remaining slots for last year. [Brown- Ok]
There’s Motion on the table, motion to reconsider, moved and seconded. All those in favor of
reconsidering the previous question, those opposed, motion fails 3, 2, nope that’s not right, yeah, Three
to Eight with Alderperson Brown, Fabrizio, and Kuehl in favor.
Alderperson Fabrizio - “Motion to adjourn”.
Mayor Cantelmo- “Second, Alderperson Shapiro, all those in favor, adjourned. [End of Audio]
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
Submitted- 3-5-2025
Adopted:
il Outlook
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com < noreply@civicplus.com>
Date Wed ?/5/20?5 5:03 PM
To Common Council <council@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
Mohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca.org >; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org >; Shaniqua Lewis
<slewis@cityofithaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name Jonathan Lam
Last Name Lam
Street Address
Municipality .Note this may
be different from your zip
code
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
New York
Re-affirm lthaca's human rights commitment for protecting
migrants
Dear lthaca City Council members,
Cornell American Civil Liberties Union and Cornell Anti-
Detention Alliance are present today to advocate that the lthaca
City Council vote to reaffirm the city's commitmenl to human
rights protection for migranls. We reiterate our unwavering
commitment to flghting for sanctuary city policies in lthaca and
longstanding immigration laws at the federal level. The
targeting and detention of marginalized individuals are
emblematic of a profoundly unjust and punitive immigration
system that is rooted in xenophobia and systemic oppression.
Since his inauguration, the Trump Administration is currently
targeting individuals with federal deportation orders, many of
whom have criminal records. Just this past week, Jesus
Romero-Hernandez, an immigrant and loved community
member was arrested on West State Street at 2 PM on January
30th. This incident is a reminder of the ongoing unconstitutional
criminalization and surveillance of immigrant communities.
While ICE operations are framed as routine federal procedures,
it is critical to acknowledge the broader implications of these
14853
Contact lnformation
ar.ests- Such aclions contribute to a climate of fear and
instability for undocumented individuals and their families. We
urge our community members to stay informed and vigilant.
Undocumented individuals, with or without pending cases for
residency and no criminal records, are precluded from the
Laken Riley Act signed by President Trump on January 29th
and hence should not be targeted by ICE without a federal
search warrant. As stated by the New York Civil Liberties
Union, "The Trump administration cannot disregard the 'loth
Amendment in its haste to carry out mass deportations. State
law also prohibits law enforcement from detaining people for
civil immigration violations. New Yorkers should be able to rely
on lheir local law enforcement to keep them safe, not spend
their time helping the Trump administration separate families."
Therefore, we must keep lthaca a sanctuary city and welcome
everyone regardless of their immigration status, background,
and identity. lmmigrants have contributed to lthaca and
Tompkins County's diversity and success. lmmigrants are our
neighbors, workers, and community members. Families
deserve to stay together and undocumented students deserve
to safely receive an education wilhout worrying about ICE
presence in their classrooms. We call for the lthaca City
Council to reaffirm its commitment to protecting and upholding
the human rights of immigrants and continue to ensure our
community is safe for everyone.
ln solidarity and the protection of civil Iiberties,
Cornell ACLU and Cornell Anti-Detention Alliance
.j14377@cornell.edu
Email not displaying correctly? View it in ur browser.
il Outloo k
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com < noreply@civicplus.com >
Date Wed 2/5/2025 4:53 PM
To Common Council < council@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
Mohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca.org >; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org >; Shaniqua Lewis
< slewis@cityofithaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name Alejandro
SantanaLast Name
Street Address
Municipality 'Note this may
be different from your zip
code
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
NY
14850
lnlet Development
My name is Alejandro Santana. A citizen of the United States of
America, a long-time resident of lthaca, NY I have lived in this
beautiful city for more than 25 years. I am a father to 4 lovely
kids who have been in the lthaca city school district. I am a
small business owner.
I came here in front of you today as a private citizen and lthaca
resident and I am deeply concerned with the lnlet Development
and the future of a volunteer institution that during all of the
planning of such a proJect hasn't been mentioned or given
much attention and importance. I am referring to the Coast
Guard Auxiliary building that they have occupied for more than
78 years to this day.
The lnlet development in its plans does not contemplate
adequate accommodation or relocation assistance should this
project get the green light. This project only contemplates
reasonable accommodation that in essence will diminish the
ability of the Coast Guard Auxiliary to carry on their missions
and their presence in Cayuga Lake.
ln my opinion, I encourage you to deeply consider and it is fair
Contact lnformation
to say that the developer shall be responsible for providing
reallocation and a new home for the Coast Guard Auxiliary with
adequate accommodations that will fulfill the needs of this great
body of volunteer men and women that keep our water of
Cayuga Lake safe. As for lhe development side of the inlet, I
think a community center small-scale building, and designating
that space as a green-protected space for recreational
purposes will be ideal tor that location.
Respectfuliy yours,
Alejandro Santana
-E-Email not displaying correctly? View it in vour browser.
il Outlook
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com < noreply@civicplus.com >
Date wed 2/5/2025 4:11 PM
To Common Council < cou ncil@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
Mohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca.org >; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org >; Shaniqua Lewis
< slewis@cityofithaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name Meg
PrichardLast Name
Street Address
Municipality 'Note this may
be different from your zip
code
Ithaca city
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
New York
Squeaky clean vacuums violating noise code
My name is Meg Prichard and lam coming before common
Council again to address the noise problems that are ongoing
since the beginning of the new Squeaky Clean's opening in
Spring of 2024.
The volume, duration, pitch and piercing tone of car wash
vacuums are amplified over the surface of Six Mile Creek
directly into our residential neighborhood 7 days a week for
12.5 hours a day.
We cannot enjoy our home, our yard or any sense of calm
since the opening of this business. The noise ordinance for
Ithaca City's code states that any unreasonable sound is "A
level of sound that is injurious or annoying or disturbing to be
heard" and that accurately describes this noise.
The city code continues in detail
Unreasonable noise prohibited.
A.
No person shall cause public inconvenience. annoyance or
alarm or create a risk thereof by makjng unreasonable noise or
by causing unreasonable noise to be made.
B.
For the purpose of implementing and enforcing the standard
set forth in Subsection A of this section, "unreasonable noise,,
shall mean any sound created or caused to be created by any
person which either annoys, disturbs, injures or endangers the
comfort, repose, health, peace or safety of the public or which
causes injury to animal life or damages to property or business.
Factors lo be considered in determining whether unreasonable
noise exists in a given situation include but are not limited to
any or all of the following:
(1)
The intensity of the noise.
(2',)
Whether the nature of the noise is usual or unusual.
(3)
Whether the origin of the noise is associaled with nature or
human-made activity.
(4)
The intensity of the background noise, if any.
(s)
The proximity of the noise to sleeping facilities.
(6)
The nature and the zoning district ofthe area within which the
noise emanates and ofthe area within 500 feet ofthe source of
the sound.
(7)
The time of the day or night the noise occurs.
(8)
The time duration of the noise.
(e)
Whether the sound source is temporary.
(10)
The volume of lhe noise.
(11 )
The existence of complaints concerning the noise from persons
living or working in different places or premises who are
affected by the noise.
These sounds do violate the city noise code under its own
deJinition.
I come home to an environment where our children have lost
their ability to enjoy their yard, the fenced-in place where they
played with one another, threw frisbees, swung from a
magnolia tree, ate family dinners....the home where I brought
our children into the world and now they cannot have my
presence as a parent because it is taken by the piercing sound
of machines that drive me from lhem, inside or away from our
property. Our children deserve our protection and to flou.ish in
their residence, their community and the city they reside in. l'm
not begging for our rights to exist as people. I am telling yall
with confidence that this harm is unnecessary and it's
happening to us...our children, our neighbors, the 6 deer who
have finally come back at night to trapse the sides of the creek.
il Outlook
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com < noreply@civicplus.com >
Date Wed 2/5/2025 2:26 PM
To Common Council < cou ncil@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
Mohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca-org >; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org >; Shaniqua Lewis
< slewis@cityofi thaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name Adam
Last Name Chandler
Street Address
Municipality *Note this may
be different from your zip
code
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
NY
Ithaca
Harms caused by Squeaky Clean car wash at South Titus and
Meadow
Hello,
I plan to attend tne 215125 City Council meeting this evening to
report on the incredibly frustrating experience neighbors and
myself have gone through in the past year trying to get the
government system we pay for to be accountable for the
mistake it made in approving the car wash at South Titus and
Meadow.
1 . Accountability
We've attended the Planning Board meetings multiple times,
the City Council meeting, called the police, and everything else
that city representatives have advised us to do. The planning
Board chail Lisa Nicholas, won't answer the basic process
I have two points to make in this public comment. First, there
are appears not to be a process in place to provide
accountability for mistakes made by the Planning Board.
Second, I am submitting on behalf the residents of our
neighborhood a petition requesting that the vacuums at the car
wash on South Titus be removed.
question l've twice asked her in public meetings (she promised
both times to answer me via email and then didn't follow-up):
When the City Planning Office makes a mistake in an approval
for a proposal what mechanisms are in place to redress lhe
harms you caused?
Given that the chair of the Planning Board won't answer my
questions, lcall on the City Council to please provide answers
2. Submission of petition to remove vacuums
ln December home owners wrote a petition requesting that the
free vacuums installed at the car wash on South Titus property
be removed. Myself and 35 other home owners who live near
the car wash signed this petition. We sent our petition to the
Planning Board in December and I am sending it to City
Council members today. We call on the City to act on our
behalf.
Your form does not permit attachments, so I am making the pdf
of the petition available at this link. Please download a copy of
the file: http-S/clryC.proton.me/urls/QY ntDv2il
Thank you,
Adam Chandler
-
arrrlr'
Contact lnformation 1
Email not displaying correctly? View it in vour browser.
il Outlook
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com <noreply@civicplus.com>
Date Wed ?/5/2025 9:42 AM
To Common Council < council@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
Mohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca.org >; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org >; Shaniqua Lewis
<slewis@cityofithaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name Kellie
Last Name Gates
Street Address
Municipality .Note this may
be different from your zip
code
14850-5236
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
Contact lnformation
Dear Mayor Cantelmo and Alderpersons lvlatos, Brown,
Nguyen, Haines-Sharp, Shapiro, Saint-Perez, Kuehl, Kumar,
Fabrizio, and Lederman,
I am writing to express my strong support of Consent Agenda
item 5.3: Resolution - lthaca a Sanctuary City. Please reaffirm
our city's committment to human rights protection for migrants,
reproductive rights, and gender affirming care. This is more
important now than ever. Thank you for protecting our
neighborsl
Sincerely,
Kellie Patrick Gates
Email not displaying correctly? View it in vour browser.
NY
Sanctuary City
([Outlook
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com < noreply@civicplus.com >
Date wed 2/5/2025 9:32 AM
To Common Council < council@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
Mohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca.org >; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org>; Shaniqua Lewis
< slewis@cityofithaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name Tom
Last Name Shevory
Street Address
Municipality 'Note this may
be different from your zip
code
Ithaca
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
New York
Squeaky Clean Carwash
Dear Council Members,
The Squeaky Clean Car Wash is an ongoing problem in the
North Titus neighborhood. lt is clearly in violalion of city noise
ordinances, and it is causing significant disruplions to the lives
of residents of at least five houses in our neighborhood,
including children, who live there.
Many members of this Common Council ran under a
progressive banner, so it seems obvious that they should not
privilege one business owner's interest, a business owner who
is flouting city codes, over the welFbeing of an entire
neighborhood.
The Common Council needs to push the Mayor and City
Attorney to fulfill their legal obligations and either require the
shutting down of the offending vacuums or to require the
installation of some means of effective noise canceling.
To do otherwise is an abrogation of the Council's duty to protest
residents by enforcing city codes that are already on the books.
lf they aren't enforced, then why even bother to have them?
il Outloo k
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com < noreply@civicplus.com>
Date Tue 2/4/2025 5:15 PM
To Common Council < council@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
lr4ohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca.org >; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org >; Shaniqua Lewis
<slewis@cityofi thaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name Kathryn
CerneraLast Name
Street Address
Municipality 'Note this may
be different from your zip
code
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
Contact lnformation
Ithaca
14850
Reaffirmation of Sanctuary City Status
Field not completed.
Email not displaying coffectly? View it in yell_Ercjfse!
dl Outlook
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com < noreply@civicplus.com>
oate Tue ?/4/2025 10:03 AM
To Common Council <council@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
Mohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca.org>; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org>; Shaniqua Lewis
< slewis@cityofi thaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name
Last Name Zona
Street Address
Municipality 'Note this may
be different from your zip
code
Trumansburg
Sol
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
NY
Sanctuary City Status Vote
To all on lhe council,
Please stand with us, the people of Tompkins County, as you
reaffirm our collective core values of caring for our neighbors
by voting to keep our sanctuary city status.
Come what may from the federal government, we refuse to be
bullied into forsaking our own community.
They will try to use us as an example, but they underestimate
our commitment and love. We will light for what we believe in
and support each other through all challenges.
Thank you for reading this. We are in unprecedenled times, but
lstill have faith in my community, the City of lthaca. please
don't take that away from me.
Sol Zona
Trumansburg. NY
Contact lnformation 4016789629
il Outloo k
Online Form Submittal: Common Council Public Comment Form
From noreply@civicplus.com < noreply@civicplus.com>
Date Sun 2/2/2025 1:50 PM
To Common Council < cou ncil@cityofithaca.org >; Robert Cantelmo < mayorcantelmo@cityofithaca.org >; Deb
Mohlenhoff <dmohlenhoff@cityofithaca.org>; Alan Karasin <AKarasin@cityofithaca.org>; Shaniqua Lewis
<slewis@cityofithaca.org >
Common Council Public Comment Form
First Name Alyssa
WeberLast Name
Street Address
Municipality 'Note this may
be different from your zip
code
State
Topic of Discussion
Your Comments
14850
NY
Resolution- lthaca a Sanctuary City
Hello,
I am writing in support of lthaca's Sanctuary City Resolution.
Freedom from discrimination based on national origin, gender
identity, and other protected characteristics is pivotal to
respectful and civil society. This past week, lthaca has been
targeted by the incoming Republican administration for these
policies, and I stand by the decisions that our officials have
made in the past. We should not waste our city officials time
and resources upholding policies based on hate, such as
detaining people for the nonviolent "crime" of existing while not
being a citizen-
I won't belabor the many benefits sanctuary cilies have see,
such as decreased crime; lwill simply save lime by thanking
you all for keeping lthaca on the right side of history. Thank you
for protecting our world's vulnerable and for standing up to
tyranny. Please vote 10 afflrm lthaca as a Sanctuary City.
Alyssa Weber
Contact lnlormation ----
Dear City Of lthaca Common Council,
Days into Donald Trump's first term as president, Common Council adopted legislation declaring
Ithaca a sanctuary city for immigrants. ln 2022, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v.
Wade,lhe Council expanded that sanctuary status to include protections for people seeking and
providing abortion services. And in 2023, against a backdrop of escalating attacks on trans
rights, they expanded those protections once again, to include people seeking and providing
gender-affirming healthcare.
Each of these measures limits the participation of our public officials in attempts by out-of-state
agencies to track and target members of vulnerable communities. Together, they send a
powerful message that the City of lthaca will not allow right-wing extremists to threaten its
people.
Another Trump inauguration approaches, and nominees to top spots in the new administration
have made it clear that they intend to bully local governments and law enforcement into
compliance with the administration's priorities. Already, incoming "border czal'Tom Homan has
threatened to arrest local officials who refuse to cooperate with the promised mass deportation
program.
ln the face of this renewed threat, we call on Mayor Cantelmo and Common Council to re-affirm
Ithaca's sanctuary statuses for immigrant rights, reproductive freedom, and genderaffirming
healthcare.
Signed by,
We oppose any attempt to conscript our public officials and public resources into serving a cruel
and discriminatory agenda that the people of lthaca have overwhelmingly rejected. We stand
with those members of our community targeted by MAGA forces, and we call on our elected
officials to do the same.
Ithaca is, and will remain, a sanctuary city.
Tompkins County lmmigrant Rights Coalition
First Unitarian Society of lthaca
Tompkins County Workers Center
Sunrise lthaca
Ithaca Teachers Association
Gimme Baristas' Union
Communication Workers Of America Local 111'1
Advocacy Center of Tompkin County Workers Union
Committee On U.S.-Latin American Relations
Youth Farm Project
Coalition For Mutual Liberation
Ithaca Communist Party USA
Date:
Time:
Location:
Watch Online:
Wednesday February 5, 2025
6:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers
https://www.youtube.com/@CityofIthacaPublicMeetings
2-5-2025 COMMON COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION
MEETING AGENDA
1.Call to Order
1.1.
1.2.
1.3.
2.Proclamations and Awards
3.Review and Approval of Minutes
3.1.
4.Petitions and Hearings of Persons Before Council
4.1.
4.2.
4.3.
5.Consent Agenda
5.1.
5.2.
5.3.
6.New Business / Member Filed
6.1.
6.2.
7.1.
7.2.
8. Report of the City Manager
8.1.
9. Report of the City Controller
9.1.
10.Executive Session (If Needed)
11.Meeting Wrap Up
Emergency Evacuation
Agenda Review
Reports From Municipal Officials
1-8-25 CC Minutes, 1-15-25 COW minutes, 1-22-25 COW Minutes
Public Hearing- A Local Law Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca
City Code, "Disability Exemption"
Statements from the Public
Privilege Of The Floor- Comments From Council and The Mayor
A Resolution to Declare Lead Agency- 200 Block of Cecil A. Malone Drive
Sidewalk Construction
Cargill Environmental Impact Statement
Resolution- Ithaca a Sanctuary City
Local Law- Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code
"Disability Exemption"
Ordinance-Amending Article I of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code, "Senior Citizens
Exemption"
7. Mayor Appointments
Advisory Committee on Encampment Response Protocol
Recommendation To TCAT
City Manager's Report- February 2025
ARPA Update
1. Announcements
2. Next Meeting
3. Meeting Adjourn
1
Public Comment Forum
The public can provide short statements during this portion of the meeting. 3 minutes is the maximum time
allotted, but the chair reserves the right to modify the amount of time per individual at the start of the meeting.
Only the first hour of the meeting is set aside for Public Comment. Groups of 3 or more speakers are allotted
more speaking time.
For Longer Speaking Time - Multiple speakers on the same topic can speak as a group with one Designated
Speaker to represent the Group. This will give you more time to share your thoughts and concerns during the
Public Comment Forum.
3-4 Persons with One Designated Speaker - Alotted 5 minutes
5 or More Persons with One Designated Speaker - Alotted 7 minutes
Can't Come to the Meeting but still want to speak?
Register to Speak Virtually - https://tinyurl.com/7ts9zmku
Attending the Meeting to Speak in Person? Pre-Registration Not Required
Comment Cards are provided to those who attend in person. Once you have filled out your Comment Card,
please hand your card to the Clerk. Your name will be called to speak in the order the cards are received.
Please Note Comment Cards will be accepted up until the Public Comment Forum begins or a maximum of 30
speakers, whichever comes first.
Once we have reached a maximum of 30 speakers, you can submit your comment using the Written Comment
Link Below.
Want to Submit a Comment and Not Speak in Person?
To Submit Written Comments - https://tinyurl.com/mr9kdhw8
*Written comments submitted with be compiled and entered into the record.
2
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Clerk's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:Mayor Robert Cantelmo
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:1-8-25 CC Minutes, 1-15-25 COW minutes, 1-22-25 COW Minutes
ITEM #:3.1
MEMORANDUM
Review and approve the January 5th Common Council Meeting minutes, January 15th, 2025,
Committee of the Whole Work Session minutes, and the January 22nd, 2025, Committee of
the Whole Study Session Meeting Minutes.
3
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Attorney's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:Mayor Robert Cantelmo
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:Public Hearing- A Local Law Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca
City Code, "Disability Exemption"
ITEM #:4.1
MEMORANDUM
A Public Hearing to receive public feedback on the proposed Local Law A Local Law
Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code, “Disability Exemption”, to Expand
Eligibility for Partial Property Tax Exemptions for Certain Persons with Disabilities
4
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Dept of Public Works-Engineering
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:Ari Hama
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:A Resolution to Declare Lead Agency- 200 Block of Cecil A. Malone Drive
Sidewalk Construction
ITEM #:5.1
MEMORANDUM
Consent- Environmental review for Construction of a new 5-foot-wide concrete sidewalk and a
4-foot-wide tree lawn area, approximately 650 feet long, along the south side of the 200 Block
of Cecil A. Malone Drive.
ATTACHMENTS:
Lead Agency res_200 Block of Cecil A. Malone_Ari Hama.pdf
Neg Dec Res__Ari Hama.pdf
Memo-200 Block Cecil Malone Sidewalk Project.pdf
EAF Short form_Ari Hama.pdf
5
Common Council
02 January 2025
A Proposed Resolution to Declare Lead Agency Status for the
Environmental Review of (200 Block of Cecil A. Malone Drive Sidewalk
Construction.) Project.
WHEREAS, the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) and the
City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (CEQR), Section
176 of the City Code, require that a lead agency be established for
conducting environmental review of projects in accordance with local and
state environmental law, and
WHEREAS, State Law specifies that for actions governed by local
environmental review, the lead agency shall be that local agency which
has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the
action, and
WHEREAS, SEQR and CEQR both provide for an uncoordinated review
for “Unlisted” projects that involve one agency, and
WHEREAS, the proposed construction of the 200 Block of Cecil A. Malone
Drive Sidewalk Construction. is a “Unlisted” action under SEQR and is an
“Unlisted” action under CEQR; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Common Council does hereby declare itself lead
agency for the environmental review of the proposed construction of the
(200 Block of Cecil A. Malone Drive Sidewalk Construction.) Project.
6
Common Council
Proposed Resolution
Environmental Review for the (200 Block of Cecil A. Malone Drive Sidewalk
Construction.) Project.
WHEREAS, the Common Council has declared itself to be the lead agency for the
environmental review for a project (“the Project”) entitled “(200 Block of Cecil A.
Malone Drive Sidewalk Construction.) Project.” in accordance with Section 176 of
the Ithaca City Code (CEQR) and in accordance with Article 8 of the New York State
Environmental Conservation Law (SEQR), and
WHEREAS, the Project includes construction or reconstruction of walkways, driveways,
curbing to enhance conditions for people walking.
WHERAS, the Project is an Unlisted action according to SEQR, and
WHERAS, a Short Environmental Assessment form was prepared by staff for SEQR, and
WHERAS, on _____ ____, 2024, the Common Council declared itself lead agency for a
coordinated environmental review for SEQR, and
WHERAS, the Common Council, acting as lead agency, has, on ______ ____, 2024,
reviewed and accepted as complete Short Environmental Assessment Forms prepared
by staff, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the Common Council determines that the project for “(200 Block of
Cecil A. Malone Drive Sidewalk Construction.) Project. located in the City of Ithaca
will result in no significant negative environmental impact and that a Negative
Declaration for purposes of Article 8 of the NYS Environmental Conservation Law be
filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality
Review Act and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Section 176 of the City Code
be filed in accordance with the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance.
7
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification."
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-5690
Office of City Engineer
Telephone: 607 / 274-6530 Fax: 607 / 274-6415
To: Common Council
From: Ari Hama, Asst. Sidewalk Program Manager.
Date: 02 January 2025
Re: (200 Block of Cecil A. Malone Drive Sidewalk Construction.) Project.
Please find enclosed for your consideration:
1. A resolution to declare lead agency for the environmental review of
the (200 Block of Cecil A. Malone Drive Sidewalk Construction.)
Project.
2. Short Environmental Assessment Forms (one for the State
Environmental Quality Review).
3. A proposed resolution to approve and declare that the project will
have no significant adverse environmental impact.
4. Project highlights:
• Construction of a new 5-foot-wide concrete sidewalk and a
4-foot-wide tree lawn area, approximately 650 feet long,
along the south side of the 200 Block of Cecil A. Malone
Drive. The work includes excavation of the existing asphalt
surface behind the curb line. Additionally, one new ADA-
compliant ramp will be installed at the west end of the
street. The project will fill the sidewalk gap between Black
Diamond Trail bridge over Flood Control Channel and the
sidewalk on the East side of Cecil Malone Dr leading to S
Meadow St.
I am proposing that the environmental review for this project be
conducted in an uncoordinated review. Both SEQR and CEQR provide for
this manner of review provided that the action is an Unlisted Action and
provided that the action is not determined to have a significant negative
impact on the environment. The list of involved agencies is only the City
of Ithaca Common Council (funding approval) this time.
If you have any questions, feel free to reach me at 607-342-2453 or
Ahama@cityofithaca.org.
8
Page 1 of 3
Short Environmental Assessment Form
Part 1 - Project Information
Instructions for Completing
Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the
application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on
information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as
thoroughly as possible based on current information.
Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the
lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.
Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information
Telephone:
E-Mail:
administrative rule, or regulation?
If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that
may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2.
NO YES
If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:
b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres
c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres
4.Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action:
Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban)
Aquatic Other(Specify):Agriculture
□ Urban
□ Forest
SEAF 2019
Parkland
9
Page 2 of 3
a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations?
b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan?
6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?NO YES
If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
8.a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels?
b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action?
c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed
action?
NO YES
If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply?
If No, describe method for pr oviding potable water: _________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities?
If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory?
NO YES
13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain
wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local ag ency?
b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody?
If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
12.a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district
which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the
Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the
State Register of Historic Places?
b.Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for
10
Page 3 of 3
14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply:
□Shoreline □ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional
Wetland □ Urban Suburban
15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or
Federal government as threatened or endangered?
16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES
17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources?
If Yes,
a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties?
b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)?
If Yes, briefly describe:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water
or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)?
If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
_
NO YES
19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste
management facility?
If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or
completed) for hazardous waste?
If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE
Date: _____________________ Applicant/sponsor/name: ____________________________________________________ __________________________
Signature: _____________________________________________________Title:__________________________________
11
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Mayor's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:Mayor Robert Cantelmo
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:Cargill Environmental Impact Statement
ITEM #:5.2
MEMORANDUM
Consent- Request to the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and Gov Hochul
to require Cargill to complete an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Cayuga Lake
Environmental Action (CLEAN) has asked the city to pass a resolution in support of a request
for a Cargill permit renewal EIS.
ATTACHMENTS:
Sample Copy Tompkins County Legislature Resolution 2023-235.pdf
Cargill_EIS_Memo_01222025.docx
2025_ Opposing the Cargill's Renewal Permit Application for the Cayuga Salt Mine.docx
12
Tompkins County Legislature Meeting: 11/08/23 5:30 PM
Governor Daniel D. Tompkins Building Department: Tompkins County Legislature
Ithaca, NY 14850 Category: Environmental
DOC ID: 11981 B
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-235
(ID # 11981)
Page 1
Resolution Urging Governor Hochul and the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) to Protect Cayuga Lake Water Quality by Requiring
of Cargill Salt Mine a Full Environmental Review, a Closure Plan, and a Surety Bond to
Ensure Safe Closure
WHEREAS, only 0.5% of the Earth’s water is freshwater available for human consumption and agriculture, and
our very limited reserves are being diminished by overuse, contamination, and drought, and
WHEREAS, Cayuga Lake is the primary source and/or backup source for nearly 100,000 watershed residents,
including municipal systems serving Seneca Falls, Wells College/Village of Aurora, and much of Tompkins County, and
WHEREAS, Cayuga Lake provides world-class opportunities for recreation and tourism vital to our local
economies, and is a critical part of the Finger Lakes’ $3 billion, 60,000 employee tourism economy that depends on
maintaining the health of the water, and
WHEREAS, both the New York State Office of General Services and the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) have stewardship responsibilities for the public lands of New York State, and
WHEREAS, salt mining beneath Cayuga Lake began before the adoption of the State Environmental Quality
Review (SEQR) Act in 1978 and salt mine operations had been permitted over time with minimal environmental review,
and
WHEREAS, safety concerns are founded on the collapse of the Retsof Mine in Livingston County, NY in 1994,
and the salinization of that county’s lower aquifer as a result, and
WHEREAS, when Cargill Salt Mine applied to renew its operating permit in 1997, the community strongly
advocated that the DEC conduct a thorough environmental review by requiring an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
and
WHEREAS, all of the criteria governing the decision to require an EIS were met at the Cayuga Salt Mine: the
failure of the Retsof mine and resulting contamination, the scope of the impact if such an event were to occur beneath
Cayuga Lake, and the potential for contaminating the waters of Cayuga Lake, and
WHEREAS, Cargill insisted it was not subject to NYS authority, and instead of an EIS, it agreed to provide an
Enhanced Environmental Assessment (EEA), but would only do that if the DEC agreed to keep almost all data and records
confidential, and
WHEREAS, the administrative record in the subsequent years has continued to reflect the lack of environmental
transparency, with the DEC denying FOIL requests and rejecting calls for an EIS, and
WHEREAS, it is quite possible that the mine will someday fill with water, therefore a study is needed to determine
the timeframe over which such flooding could happen, the extent of the damage that could be caused, methods of preventing
or mitigating such occurrence, and projected costs that would be incurred, and
13
Resolution (ID # 11981) Meeting of November 8, 2023
Page 2
WHEREAS, Cargill may now be positioning itself to sell the mine, a triggering event that the DEC should use to
establish and enforce Cargill’s accountability for the long-term safety of Cayuga Lake regardless of future ownership of the
mine, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Tompkins County Legislature urges Governor Hochul and the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation require a full, independent, and public environmental review of the mine’s operations
assessing their long-term potential impact on a valuable, publicly owned natural resource,
RESOLVED, further, That as required by the Mined Land Reclamation Law, but not yet required of Cargill by the
DEC, the Tompkins County Legislature urges an end-of-life plan must be required and approved by the DEC to address the
safe closure of the portion of the mine beneath the Lake, to mitigate the potential impact of the mine’s operations on the
Lake’s water quality,
RESOLVED, further, That the Tompkins County Legislature urges that Cargill, and/or a future buyer, be required
to post an environmental bond with New York State, in an amount to be established by an independent natural resource
economist, to ensure the availability of adequate funding to implement said end-of-life plan and to compensate both private
and public entities for any natural resource damage claims,
RESOLVED, further, That the Clerk of the Legislature is directed to send a copy of this resolution to Governor
Kathy Hochul, New York State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, New York State Assembly Speaker Carl
Heastie, New York State Senators Pete Harckham, Rachel May, Tom O’Mara, and Lea Webb; New York State
Assemblymembers Deborah Glick and Anna Kelles; John O’Leary, Deputy Secretary for Energy and the Environment,
Office of the Governor; Jeanette Moy, Commissioner, Office of General Services; Basil Seggos, Commissioner, Department
of Environmental Conservation, the Cayuga County Legislature, the Seneca County Board of Supervisors, and others as
deemed appropriate.
SEQR ACTION: TYPE II-26
14
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: January 22, 2025
To: Common Council
From: Mayor Robert Cantelmo
RE: Cargill Permit Renewal EIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Cayuga Lake Environmental Ac?on requested that the City approve a resolu?on suppor?ng their request that
the DEC require Cargill to submit an Environmental Impact Statement before the DEC renews its five-year
Mined Land Reclama?on Permit for the Cayuga Salt Mine. Cargill has modified its permit request to include
plans to flood the abandoned S3 Zone of the mine beneath Cayuga Lake with wastewater, poten?ally
impac?ng the environment and the community.
HISTORY & BACKGROUND
It’s been 30 years since the collapse of the Retsof Salt Mine, the only other large NYS salt mine, in 1994 and
the Assembly’s Joint Public Hearing on Underground Mining in NYS in 1995. It’s been 25 years since
Assemblymember Maty Luster believed that the DEC was commi?ed to ordering Cargill to conduct an EIS to
be?er understand the risks of mining beneath Cayuga Lake. Ul?mately the DEC did not require an EIS and the
community has con?nued to request an EIS prior to subsequent permit renewals.
15
Resolution Regarding Cargill Incorporated’s Renewal Permit Application for the Cayuga Salt
Mine
WHEREAS, Cargill Incorporated has submitted a permit application (0-9999-00075/00001) to
renew and modify its Mined Land Reclamation Permit for the Cayuga Salt Mine, which includes
plans to flood the abandoned S3 Zone of the mine beneath Cayuga Lake with wastewater,
potentially impacting the environment and the community;
WHEREAS, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has declared
itself the lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) and has issued
a Negative Declaration despite the application being classified as a Type I action, which typically
requires a more thorough environmental review;
WHEREAS, significant concerns have been raised regarding the adequacy of Cargill’s application,
including compliance with the Mined Land Reclamation Law, monitoring and treatment of
waste materials, the potential for groundwater pollution, the stability of the mine, and the
long-term reclamation of the affected areas;
WHEREAS, the proposed flooding of the S3 Zone raises serious questions about the safety and
environmental integrity of Cayuga Lake, particularly in light of prior instability noted in this area
and the implications of storing unsaturated brine beneath the lake;
Whereas, since the collapse of Retsof, the only other large NYS salt mine, in 1994 and the
Assembly’s Joint Public Hearing on Underground Mining in NYS in 1995, many local
municipalities and nonprofits whose missions are to preserve Cayuga Lake’s Water Quality have
supported an independent third-party scientific review of the relevant data facilitated by an
Environmental Impact Study to provide a more comprehensive public assessment of the long-
term threats to the Lake from the large beneath the Lake rock salt mine
Whereas, since the community has been denied access to much of the relevant geological and
seismic data needed to assess the risk of the mine’s operations, the DEC’s Senior Administrative
Law Judge found in 2002 that “shielding from public scrutiny the very information to assess the
potential environmental impact and safety issues associated with a proposed mine (Permit) is
inimical to the process,” and in 2005 the DEC’s Asst. Commissioner overruled the ALJ and
denied access to this information as a trade secret, we urge the DEC to reject this overly broad
determination and order the release of the necessary data.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Cityof Ithaca formally requests that the DEC:
1. Deny Cargill’s permit application or, alternatively, rescind the Negative Declaration and
require the preparation of a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement to assess all
potential environmental risks associated with the proposed activities.
16
2. Conduct a public hearing to allow for community input and address the substantive concerns
raised by residents and stakeholders regarding the application.
3. Ensure that Cargill’s Reclamation Plan and accompanying bond are revised to adequately
address environmental protection and public safety, and that sufficient measures are
implemented to prevent potential pollution and ensure the long-term stability of the mine and
surrounding areas.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution besent to
Comment.CayugaSaltMine2023@dec.ny.gov, DEC Region 7 Administrator Dereth Glance
(dereth.glance@dec.ny.gov), DEC Interim Commissioner Sean Mahar
(sean.mahar@dec.ny.gov), OGS Commissioner Jeanette Moy
(officeofthecommissioner@ogs.ny.gov) to ensure that the voices of the City of Ithaca residents
are heard in this critical decision-making process.
17
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Mayor's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:Mayor Robert Cantelmo
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:Resolution- Ithaca a Sanctuary City
ITEM #:5.3
MEMORANDUM
Consent- A Resolution Reaffirming the City of Ithaca’s Commitment to Human Rights
Protection for Migrants, Reproductive Rights, and Gender Affirming Care
ATTACHMENTS:
Amended Sanctuary_City_2025_Reaffirmation.pdf
18
A Resolution Reaffirming the City of Ithaca’s Commitment to Human Rights Protection for
Migrants, Reproductive Rights, and Gender Affirming Care
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca code prohibits discrimination against any individuals on the basis of
actual or perceived age; creed; color; disability; domestic violence victim status; ethnicity; familial
status; gender; gender identity or expression; height; immigration or citizenship status; marital status;
military status; national origin; predisposing genetic characteristics; race; religion; sex; sexual
orientation; socioeconomic status; or weight, and
WHEREAS in February 2017, the City of Ithaca Common Council unanimously adopted an
ordinance recognizing the importance of fostering a city that is welcoming and inclusive for all
individuals, regardless of nationality or citizenship status, and to ensure, to the greatest extent
permitted by law, that immigration enforcement is a function of the federal government and not the
City of Ithaca, and
WHEREAS in July 2022, the City of Ithaca Common Council unanimously adopted an ordinance
recognizing the importance of reproductive healthcare as a matter of health, privacy, and equality
and to ensure, to the greatest extent permitted by law, that those rights are upheld for all within the
City of Ithaca, and
WHEREAS in September 2023, the City of Ithaca Common Council unanimously adopted a
resolution endorsing and supporting access to gender-affirming care to minors and adults, and
WHEREAS the political climate in Washington, DC and the rhetoric of the federal administration
have introduced significant anxiety and fear around the protection of human rights in these areas,
now therefore be it
RESOLVED, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Ithaca hereby reaffirm and uphold
our commitment to those protected by these laws and those aforementioned communities
enumerated in the City’s antidiscrimination code, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Common Council requests that the administration adhere to and
implement all appropriate administrative policies and procedures and recommend to the Common
Council further policies that reflect the City’s commitment to the above.
19
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Attorney's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:City Attorney Victor Kessler
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:Local Law- Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code
"Disability Exemption"
ITEM #:6.1
MEMORANDUM
Voting Item: A Local Law Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code,
“Disability Exemption”, to Expand Eligibility for Partial Property Tax Exemptions for Certain
Persons with Disabilities
ATTACHMENTS:
Local Law 2025-FINAL Disability RP Tax Exemption Local Law.pdf
20
1
A Local Law Amending Article V of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code, “Disability
Exemption”, to Expand Eligibility for Partial Property Tax Exemptions for Certain
Persons with Disabilities
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2022, the Governor signed into law a bill amending Section 459-c of
the Real Property Tax Law to permit taxing jurisdictions to expand income eligibility for the
partial property tax exemption for certain persons with disabilities, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca desires to amend Chapter 300-26 of the
Ithaca City Code in order to effectuate this expansion; now, therefore
LOCAL LAW 2025-__
BE IT ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as follows:
Section 1. Legislative findings, intent, and purpose.
The Common Council of the City of Ithaca makes the following findings:
1. Housing affordability is a serious issue that disproportionately impacts low-income
households.
2. The income thresholds for providing property tax relief to persons with disabilities whose
incomes are limited by reason of such disabilities have not been adjusted since the 2013
enactment of Local Law 2013-4.
3. Providing additional tax relief by expanding eligibility thresholds will provide a
significant benefit to such persons with disabilities without unduly burdening ineligible
taxpayers.
Based upon the above findings, the intent and purpose of this Local Law is to expand eligibility
for property tax relief for persons with disabilities whose incomes are limited by reason of such
disabilities.
Section 2. Amendments to Chapters 300-1 and 300-2 of the Ithaca City Code
The following portions of Chapter 300-26 of the Ithaca City Code are hereby amended as
follows: 1
1 Strikethrough indicates removals. Underlining indicates additions. Ellipses (…) indicate the omitted text remains
unaltered.
21
2
§ 300-26. Statutory authority; exemption granted; terms and conditions.
…
B. Exemption granted.
(1) Pursuant to the provisions of § 459-c of the Real Property Tax Law of the State of New
York, real property located in the City of Ithaca owned by one or more persons, each of
whom is disabled and whose income is limited by reason of such disability, or real
property owned by a married couple or siblings, one of whom is disabled and whose
income is limited by reason of such disability, shall be partially exempt from taxation
by said City for the applicable taxes specified in § 459-c based upon the income of the
owner or combined income of the owners. Such partial exemption shall be to the extent
set forth in the schedule following:
Annual Income of Owner or
Combined Annual Income of
Owners
Assessed Valuation Exempt From
Taxation
Up to but less than $29,00050,000 50%
Up to but less than $30,00051,000 45%
Up to but less than $31,00052,000 40%
Up to but less than $32,00053,000 35%
Up to but less than $32,90053,900 30%
Up to but less than $33,80054,800 25%
Up to but less than $34,70055,700 20%
Up to but less than $35,60056,600 15%
Up to but less than $36,50057,500 10%
Up to but less than $37,40058,400 5%
(2) This partial exemption provided by this article shall, however, be limited to such
property and persons as meet the conditions, qualifications, exclusions, and
limitations set forth in § 459-c of the Real Property Tax Law of the State of New
York. This article shall be administered in accordance with said sections of the
Real Property Tax Law, as now adopted, and as they may be amended from time to
time, and the provisions of said section, as provided in § 459-c, shall be applicable
to the effectuation of the exemption provided for in this article.
…
22
3
Section 3. Severability Clause
Severability is intended throughout and within the provisions of this Local Law. If any section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Local Law is held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Local Law.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This Local Law shall be effective immediately upon filing in the office of the Secretary of State.
23
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Attorney's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:City Attorney Victor Kessler
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:Ordinance-Amending Article I of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code, "Senior
Citizens Exemption"
ITEM #:6.2
MEMORANDUM
Voting Item: An Ordinance Amending Article I of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code, “Senior
Citizens Exemption”, to Expand Eligibility for Partial Property Tax Exemptions for Low-Income
Persons Aged 65 Years or Older
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance 2025- FINAL Senior RP Tax Exemption Ord.pdf
24
1
An Ordinance Amending Article I of Chapter 300 of the Ithaca City Code, “Senior Citizens
Exemption”, to Expand Eligibility for Partial Property Tax Exemptions for Low-Income
Persons Aged 65 Years or Older
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2022, the Governor signed into law a bill amending Section 467 of the
Real Property Tax Law to permit taxing jurisdictions to expand income eligibility for the partial
property tax exemption for low-income seniors, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca desires to amend Chapters 300-1 and
300-2 of the Ithaca City Code in order to effectuate this expansion; now, therefore
ORDINANCE 2025-__
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as follows:
Section 1. Legislative findings, intent, and purpose.
The Common Council of the City of Ithaca makes the following findings:
1. Housing affordability is a serious issue that disproportionately impacts low-income
households.
2. The income thresholds for providing property tax relief to low-income seniors have not
been amended since the 2013 enactment of Ordinance No. 2013-14.
3. Providing additional tax relief by expanding eligibility thresholds will provide a
significant benefit to low-income seniors without unduly burdening ineligible taxpayers.
Based upon the above findings, the intent and purpose of this Ordinance is to expand eligibility
for property tax relief for low-income persons aged 65 or older.
Section 2. Amendments to Chapters 300-1 and 300-2 of the Ithaca City Code
The following portions of Chapters 300-1 and 300-2 of the Ithaca City Code are hereby amended
as follows: 1
§ 300-1. Exemption granted.
A. Pursuant to the provisions of § 467 of the Real Property Tax Law of the State of New
1 Strikethrough indicates removals. Underlining indicates additions. Ellipses (…) indicate the omitted text remains
unaltered.
25
2
York, real property in the City of Ithaca owned by one or more persons, each of whom is
65 years of age or over, or real property owned by a married couple or by siblings, one of
whom is 65 years of age or over, shall be partially exempt from taxation by the City based
upon the income of the owner or the combined incomes of the owners.
(1) Such partial exemption shall be to the extent set forth in the schedule following:
Annual Income of Owner or
Combined Annual Income of
Owners
Assessed Valuation Exempt From
Taxation
Up to but less than $29,00050,000 50%
Up to but less than $30,00051,000 45%
Up to but less than $31,00052,000 40%
Up to but less than $32,00053,000 35%
Up to but less than $32,90053,900 30%
Up to but less than $33,80054,800 25%
Up to but less than $34,70055,700 20%
Up to but less than $35,60056,600 15%
Up to but less than $36,50057,500 10%
Up to but less than $37,40058,400 5%
(2) The partial exemption provided by this article shall, however, be limited to
such property and persons as meet the conditions, exclusions and limitations set
forth in § 467 of the Real Property Tax Law of the State of New York.
…
§ 300-2. Limitations on exemption.
No exemption shall be granted:
A. If the income of the owner or the combined income of the owners of the property exceeds
the sum of $37,40058,400 for the income tax year immediately preceding the date of
making application for exemption as consistent with the schedule provided in § 300-1A.
"Income tax year" and “income” shall be defined as set forth in section 467 of the New
York State Real Property Tax Law or any successor theretomean a twelve-month period
for which the owner or owners filed a federal personal income tax return or, if no such
return is filed, the calendar year. Where title is vested in either spouse, their combined
income may not exceed such sum. Such income shall include social security and
retirement benefits, interest, dividends, total gain from the sale or exchange of a capital
asset in the same income tax year, net rental income, salary or earnings and net income
26
3
from self-employment but shall not include a return of capital, gifts or inheritances. In
computing net rental income and net income from self-employment, no depreciation
deduction shall be allowed for the exhaustion of, or wear and tear on, real or personal
property held for the production of income.
…
Section 3. Severability Clause
Severability is intended throughout and within the provisions of this Ordinance. If any section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date
This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in accordance with law upon publication of
notices as provided in the Ithaca City Charter.
27
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Mayor's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:Deputy City Manager Dominick Reccio
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:Advisory Committee on Encampment Response Protocol
ITEM #:7.1
MEMORANDUM
Voting Item: City of Ithaca Common Council establish an Advisory Committee to Review and
Evaluate Homeless Encampment Policies and Protocols comprised of three Members of the
Common Council, members of City Staff, and representatives from community partner
agencies
ATTACHMENTS:
011525_Encampment Review Committee Resolution.pdf
28
Proposed Resolution
City of Ithaca Common Council
January 15, 2025
Review and Evaluation of Pilot Administrative Policy to Manage Homeless
Encampments on City Property, Response Protocol to Unsanctioned Encampments
on City Lands
WHEREAS, on September 15, 2023, the Common Council adopted the Pilot Administrative
Policy to Manage Homeless Encampments on City Property (Policy) that designated a 28-
acre City-owned area where camping by persons experiencing homelessness will be
temporarily allowed as an exception to the citywide prohibition on camping on City lands,
and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2023, the City of Ithaca Common Council adopted the
Response Protocol to Unsanctioned Encampments on City Property (Protocol) and it has
now been in effect for one full year, and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has convened a regular meeting of City staff and community
partner agency representatives to effectuate the protocol and ensure outreach services are
provided to campers on City land, and
WHEREAS, the City Manager was directed to operationalize the protocol and recommend
further amendments to the policy; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the City of Ithaca Common Council establish an Advisory Committee to
Review and Evaluate Homeless Encampment Policies and Protocols comprised of three
Members of the Common Council, members of City Staff, and representatives from
community partner agencies, with the mandate to review and evaluate the implementation
of the Pilot Administrative Policy to Manage Homeless Encampments and Response
Protocol to Unsanctioned Encampments on City Lands:
•Determine effectiveness of communication with campers asked to move from
actively managed public lands and supportive community partner agency staff
•Determine effectiveness of supportive transition resources offered to campers
asked to move from actively managed public lands
•Review hazard remediation actions taken for any removed campsites
•Determine whether availability of sanctioned camping areas provide sufficient size
and character for individuals seeking campsites, determine whether sanctioned
areas minimize the number of scattered encampments in other areas of the City
29
•Document financial resources committed and spent to date to support the policy
and protocol
and be it further,
RESOLVED, that the Mayoral Appointments for this committee be
Alderperson Kayla Matos
Alderperson David Shapiro
Alderperson Patrick Kuehl
and be it further,
RESOLVED, the City Manager’s appointments for this committee be
Deputy City Manager Dominick Recckio (Chair)
Encampment Response Coordinator (to be named)
IURA Director Nels Bohn
Ithaca Police Department Chief Thomas Kelly
Human Services Coalition Director of Housing Initiatives Liddy Bargar
REACH Medical Community Outreach and Case Management Supervisor Anna
Vergari
and be it further,
RESOLVED,
RESOLVED,
30
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
Mayor's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:Mayor Robert Cantelmo
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:Recommendation To TCAT
ITEM #:7.2
MEMORANDUM
Voting Item: Common Council recommends Professor Nick Klein be appointed to the
Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit Board for a 3 year term ending December 31st 2027
ATTACHMENTS:
Recommendations to TCAT- Nick Klein.pdf
31
Recommendations to Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit Board – Resolution
RESOLVED, That Common Council recommends Professor Nick Klein
be appointed to the Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit Board for a Three (3) year
term to expire December 31, 2027.
32
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-6590
City Manager's Office
Shaniqua Lewis, Deputy City Clerk
TO:Common Council
FROM:Deb Mohlenhoff, City Manager
DATE:February 5, 2025
RE:City Manager's Report- February 2025
ITEM #:8.1
MEMORANDUM
ATTACHMENTS:
2-5-25 City Manager Report Monthly Report to CC.pdf
33
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: February 5, 2025
To: Common Council
From: Deborah Mohlenhoff, City Manager
RE: Monthly City Manager Report on January 2025
I am pleased to provide this monthly report to Council that will serve as an opportunity to highlight the work of our city
departments in the past month and give key updates on ongoing initiatives.
City Attorney
The Attorney’s Office assisted with research and drafting for the tax exemption legislation being considered before
Common Council in February, and continues to support Council, the City Manager, department heads, boards and
commissions, and line staff in the daily operations of the City. Thanks to the increased staffing authorized by Common
Council, the Office will have additional resources in 2025 and intends to work closely with relevant departments to
review enforcement procedures with an eye towards increasing compliance, to dedicate additional time and resources to
furthering Common Council’s legislative priorities (including major structural initiatives arising from 2024 committee
reports), and to work closely with the City Manager and leadership team to ensure a smooth second year of transition to
the new form of government. The Attorney’s Office is also closely monitoring developments on the federal level and
stands ready to defend the City’s home rule prerogatives as guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution and Article IX of the New York State Constitution.
Public Information & Technology/City Clerk
The Department of Public Information and Technology is very pleased to report that we have brought a new Community
Permit Specialist on board. She will be concentrating on permitting/events on the Commons, Collegetown noise permits,
and administering our See-Click-Fix citizen reporting tool. She will also be reviewing documentation and creating guides
for members of the public to help streamline their event permitting processes.
Ithaca Youth Bureau
Youth Development
• Big Brothers Big Sisters held their Youth Insight Panel on Mentoring and Youth Art Show on Saturday, January
25th. The event featuring a panel of current and alumni Littles discussing their thoughts and feelings on
mentoring was well attended.
• Thanks to excellent recruitment work over the last few months BBBS has 16 new volunteers to match with
eagerly awaiting Littles.
34
• College and Career Discovery Program is partnering with Cornell Cooperative Extension and Hammerstone
School for learning opportunities around cooking, nutrition, and carpentry.
• Outings has been busy with the Pathfinders, Explorers, Trailblazers after-school programs and registration-based
adventure programs started up again this month. During January we offer ASCEND: Rock Adventures. This is an
indoor rock climbing program for young people ages 5 - 11 that takes place at the Lindseth Climbing Wall.
• Youth Council Ambassadors has been meeting weekly since late October. This year, meetings are structured
around skills and experiences, using the lens of current events for topical content. The skill area units are Civic
Engagement, Ideation and Creative Problem Solving, and Public Speaking and are incorporating experiences of
community service, engaging with local government, and group discussion and debate.
Recreation
• Winter 2025 classes, programs, and leagues are underway. In addition to our regular line-up of Expressive Arts
(including an “Art Afterschool” and selection of Pottery themed classes), Small Ball Basketball, 6th Grade
Basketball, the Role Playing Game Group, and 3 levels of Tae Kwon Do classes, we have a new Yoga class that just
began and Dance class which will start soon.
• By popular request, we have added Mondays to our offered days of Tot Spot and had 12 littles with their adults
in attendance on the recent Monday Holiday!
Parks
• Our front office team had a successful opening of pavilion reservations for the 2025 Pavilion Season at Stewart
and Cass Park with 39 individual rentals and close to $14,000 worth of business happening on the first day. This
year, we changed the date that we opened for pavilion reservations to be separate from the day that we open
the boat rack reservations with great success. Look for 2025 Boat Rack Rentals to open for the season on
February 12th!
• The pavilion addition at Stewart Park is substantially completed with some finishing work to be completed in
April when the weather improves.
• Meloney McMurry has been hired as the new Executive Director of Friends of Stewart Park. We are excited to
work with her!
• Cass Park Rink is extremely busy with 13-15 hours of programming daily. Public skating has been extremely
popular and well-attended. 400 people enrolled in Learn to Skate lessons this season.
• We hosted another successful annual regional tournament for TGHA (Tompkins Girls Hockey Assoc).
• Capital Projects at Cass Park including replacements of the Union Field and Pavilion restroom buildings,
replacement of the large pavilion, and the removal of the diesel generator for field lights are progressing through
the design process.
• We are progressing with Cass Park Pool Filter House improvements to conclude the Cass Park Pool Renovation
Project.
• The Town of Ithaca renewed their annual financial support for Cass and Stewart Parks at their January meeting.
Ithaca Fire Department
• All shifts completed a one-day course entitled “Above the line / Below the Line”. It helps Firefighters size up
Hazardous Materials calls to determine initial actions.
• The new Heavy Rescue is in Albany where it is being upfitted to fit specific IFD needs (tool mounting, cascade
system installation, etc.) The Heavy Rescue will replace an existing vehicle that is 34 years old. (Photo Attached)
• IFD has submitted a FEMA Assistance to Firefighter’s Grant (AFG) to purchase needed portable radios.
35
• FF Jillian Morales has completed an Associate's Degree in Fire Science from Columbia Southern University.
• FF Emily Rodekohr received a Call Commendation by Central New York Regional EMS for a cardiac arrest call that
had a successful outcome.
• Recruit Firefighters Bellingham, Walsh, Shoemaker, Young, and Adams were sworn in by the Mayor on 1/7/25.
They have completed initial IFD specific training and have transitioned to shift.
• IFD interviewed twenty eligible candidates to fill four Firefighter positions. Four new Firefighters start with IFD
on Wednesday 1/29/25. The 15-Week Fire Academy starts on 2/10/25.
• IFD is offering the entry-level Firefighter Civil Service Exam on 1 March 2025. 98 people have submitted
applications.
• Work continues on the EHFS. The building is enclosed and approximately 60% of the building is completed.
(Photo Attached)
Human Resources
The HR Department has created a work plan and goals derived from City manager’s top priorities.
Please see the HR Department 2025 Workplan for additional details pertaining to achieving these goals.
Ithaca Police Department
Please see the IPD goals and objectives for 2025. These were created with IPD department unit heads and will be
distributed to sergeants in the first week of February.
Public Works
Superintendent
36
• Met with Barton & Loguidice and FEMA to discuss how to address conservative assumptions in the FEMA flood
model, which are preventing us from progressing the mitigation design effort. FEMA directed the City to use the
LOMR process, which will add time and cost to the mitigation project. The Superintendent is working with B&L
to start the LOMR application.
Engineering
• Design approval granted for the Stewart Ave bridge over Fall Creek (deck replacement) and design is on-going
for the N. Cayuga St bridge over Fall Creek (full replacement).
• Design continues for trail extension to the Kirby Edmonds bridge over Rt 13 and the Town of Ithaca's Gateway
trail, including access to Buttermilk Falls State Park.
• Design development continues for Cass Park pavilion and bathroom building replacements, partially grant-
funded.
• Safe Streets and Roads for All project (www.safestreetstompkins.com) scheduled public information meetings in
December. Network and crash history analysis is complete, working on setting goals and priorities
• Refining draft Design Report for Route 13/Cayuga Waterfront Revitalization project (BUILD grant,
www.route13ithaca.com). Environmental review and design approval to follow.
• Sidewalk 2025 work plan has been adopted. Working on bid documents for 2025 construction.
Streets & Facilities
• Continued catchbasin cleaning and repair (Citywide)
• Continued utility patch repair (Citywide).
• Plowed snow and salted roads as needed
Water & Sewer
• Continued water main replacement on South Albany from Green to Clinton
• Continued work on ice melting infrastructure for Cascadilla and Fall Creeks
• Continued hydrant relocations, and general water & sewer service installs
• Extended Camden Group contract for 2025 WWTP operations
• Working with HR to get restored WWTP positions advertised
Parking & Commons
• Recruited and successfully hired a new Ithaca Commons Maintenance Supervisor, Joe Dixon, who was formerly a
Building and Grounds Maintenance Worker
• Despite bitterly cold temperatures, maintained normal proficiency in Operations across all three of our Parking
Garages as well as above average ticketing and towing functions by our Community Service Officers.
• Met with Flowbird (a new partner with ParkMobile) to explore more effective and future solutions for On-Street
parking payment.
37