HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-ILPC-2024-05-21Approved on: 8/20/2024
Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC)
Minutes – May 21, 2024
Commission Member Present: Ed Finegan, Chair
David Kramer, Vice Chair
Stephen Gibian
Katelin Olson
Avi Smith
Absent: Susan Stein
Janet Smith
Common Council Members Present: None
City Staff Present Bryan McCracken, Hist. Pres. and Neighborhood
Planner & ILPC Secretary
Marjorie McLain, Administrative Assistant
_______________________________________________________________________
The regular monthly meeting of the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission was held in the
Conference Room on Second Floor of City Hall and also conducted remotely using
videoconferencing technology. Virtual participation in public meetings is authorized by Part
WW of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2022 of New York State and Local Law 2022-05. The
proceedings were livestreamed on the City of Ithaca Public Meetings channel on YouTube and a
recording is available here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9M0mevH5Oo&list=PLfplo_VA57eo3g_kXLZ3SKSop7C
-uS_Md&index=2
Chair Ed Finegan called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. and read the Public Notice.
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. 934 Stewart Avenue, Cornell Heights Historic District—Proposal to Replace Two
Elevated Concrete and Metal Walkways on the Primary (East) Façade with Stairs and Landings
Constructed from Concrete, Wood, and Composite Materials.
Architect Jason Demarest appeared on behalf of the property owner, Travis Hyde
Properties/Edgeview Commons, LLC., to present the proposed project at 934 Stewart Avenue. This
property is a non-contributing resource in the locally designated Cornell Heights Historic District.
J. Demarest summarized the changes to the project since it was presented to the Commission in
April. He noted the configuration of the stairs and walkways and the use of a composite rail system
Approved on: 8/20/2024
with square balusters. The support structure will be concrete while the landings and stairs will be
pressure-treated wood.
PUBLIC HEARING
On a motion by A. Smith, seconded by D Kramer, Chair E. Finegan opened the Public Hearing.
There being no members of the public appearing and wishing to speak, and no written comments
submitted to be read aloud, Chair E. Finegan closed the Public Hearing on a motion by D.
Kramer, seconded by K. Olson.
S. Gibian asked whether the walkway on the south side of the building will stay and do the red
lines on the drawing indicate the property lines. J. Demarest responded that the walkway is
staying. He confirmed the red lines do indicate the property lines.
S. Gibian observed that the stair system is on city-owned property. J. Demarest stated he was in
touch with T. Logue from the City’s Engineering Department and reported that T. Logue was
fine with attaching the stairs to the city-owned retaining wall as its replacement is not in the
budget at this time. S. Gibian stated he was in favor of the proposed configuration of the stairs.
He further stated the looks of the composite wood railing look appropriate for this application.
K. Olson asked if there were any changes to the entranceways. J. Demorest stated no.
RESOLUTION: 934 Stewart Avenue, Cornell Heights Historic District—Proposal Remove
Two Elevated Metal Walkways on the Primary (East) Façade with Stairs and Landings
Constructed from Concrete, Wood and Composite Materials
WHEREAS, 934 Stewart Ave. is located within the Cornell Heights Historic District, as
designated under Section 228-3 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code in 1989, and
as listed on the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places in 1989,
and
WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, an Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness, dated May 09, 2024, was submitted for review to
the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) by Jason K. Demarest
Architecture on behalf of property owner Travis Hyde Properties/Edgeview
Commons, LLC, including the following: (1) two narratives respectively titled
Description of Proposed Change(s) and Reasons for Changes(s); (2) a sheet title
“934 Stewart Ave Ramp Replacement Project: Comparison of Existing & New
Site Plan, 05-09-24; (3) three sheets of photographs documenting existing
conditions; (4) a comparative site plan showing the existing conditions and the
proposed changes; (4) four sheets of drawing for the project “Travis-Hyde:
Edgecliff Apartments” prepared by the applicant, dated May 8, 2024, and titled
Cover Sheet – Renderings (C1.00), “Stair Elevations” (A2.00), “Stair Sections &
3D Views” (A3.00), and “East Elevation-LPSR” (A2.01) (05.09.24), and
Approved on: 8/20/2024
WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed the New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form
for 934 Stewart Ave., and the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic District
Summary Statement, and
WHEREAS, as stated in the narrative Description of Proposed Change(s), the project involves
the demolition of two elevated concrete and metal walkways on the east elevation
and their replacement with a two-story stairway constructed of concrete, wood
and composite materials, and
WHEREAS, the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness is a Type II Action under the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance for which no further environmental review is required,
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to
evaluate impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding
properties, and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing for the purpose of considering approval of the Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC
meeting on May 21, 2024, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and
the proposal:
As identified in the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic District Summary
Statement, the period of significance for the area now known as the Cornell
Heights Historic District is 1898-1937.
As indicated in the New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form, 934
Stewart Ave. was constructed between 1946 and 1956.
Constructed outside the period of significance, the property is considered a non-
contributing element of the Cornell Heights Historic District.
In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new
construction, or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine
that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on
the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance and value of either the
landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring
improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural
value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is
Approved on: 8/20/2024
consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of
the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-6 of the Municipal
Code. In making this determination, the Commission is guided by the
principles set forth in Section 228-6B of the Municipal Code, as further
elaborated in Section 228-6C, and by the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for Rehabilitation, and in this case specifically the following
principles and Standards:
Standard #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction
shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new
work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the
massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic
integrity of the property and its environment.
As a non-contributing structure, 934 Stewart Ave., by definition, does not possess
historic materials or features that are subject to protection under the Principles
enumerated in Section 228-5 of the Municipal Code or the Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards. The ILPC’s evaluation of the proposed project is therefore
limited to the assessment of the impact of the proposed work on adjacent historic
structures and on the Cornell Heights Historic District as a whole, with the
guiding principle being that the proposed work must not further reduce the
compatibility of the non-contributing structure within its historic environment.
With respect to Standard #9, the demolition of the elevated walkways and the
construction of a staircase constructed of concrete, wood, and composite materials
will not remove distinctive materials and will not alter features and spaces that
characterize the Cornell Heights Historic District.
Also with respect to Standard #9, the proposed stairway is compatible with the
massing, size, scale, and architectural features of the property and its
environment. In consideration of the use of composite materials for the railing
system, the Commission noted that its use does not make the non-contributing
building less compatible with the historic environment and the material is not
being used as a substitute or replacement for a historic material.
RESOLVED, that, based on the findings set forth above, the proposal will not have a substantial
adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the
Cornell Heights Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-6, and be it further,
RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal
meets criteria for approval under Section 228-6 of the Municipal Code, and be it
further
Approved on: 8/20/2024
RESOLVED, that the ILPC approves the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness with
the following condition:
• The design details and materials for the proposed treads shall be submitted to
ILPC staff for consideration and approval prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit.
RECORD OF VOTE:
Moved by: D. Kramer
Seconded by: A. Smith
In Favor: D. Kramer, E. Finnegan, A. Smith, K. Olson, S. Gibian
Against: 0
Abstain: 0
Absent: J. Smith, S. Stein
Vacancies: 0
III. OLD BUSINESS
A. 209 Eddy Street, East Hill Historic District—Proposal to Construct a Gravel-Paved
Parking Area for Two Cars in the Rear Yard with Vehicular Access Through the Rear Yard of
211 Eddy Street.
Architect Claudia Brenner appeared on behalf of property owner Ike Nestopoulos, also in
attendance, to present the proposed project. 209 Eddy Street is a contributing resource in the
locally designated East Hill Historic District.
Per the Commission’s request, C. Brenner stated that the topography of the site was evaluated,
with particular attention given to the grade at the entrance to the parking area. A proposed
grading plan addressing the topographical differences between 209 and 211 Eddy Street was
presented to the Commission.
S. Gibian stated that he saw where they had addressed the drop off at the new driveway entrance
to 209 Eddy Street from 211 Eddy Street. He asked if the three circles in front of the parking
spots on the proposed site plan were bushes. C. Brenner stated they are bushes; however, a
variety has not been determined yet.
K. Olson expressed concerns about the conversion of this rear yard into parking, noting
landscaped quality of the East Hill Historic District and the “green” rear yards of the properties
within it are important character defining features.
Board members concluded that the addition of a paved area for two cars behind the residence
would not remove a substantial amount of green space and would not alter the historic character
of the neighborhood. Members noted the low visibility of the proposed paved area and the
vegetative screen contributed to their decision.
Approved on: 8/20/2024
RESOLUTION: 209 Eddy Street, East Hill Historic District―Proposal to Contract a
Gravel-Paved Parking Area for Five Cars in the Rear and Side Yards with Vehicular
Access Through the Rear Yard of 211 Eddy Street
WHEREAS, 209 Eddy Street is located in the East Hill Historic District, as designated under
Section 228-3 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code in 1988, and as listed on the
New York State and National Registers of Historic Places in 1986, and
WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, an Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness, dated January 23, 2024, was submitted for review
to the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) by property owner Ike
Nestopoulos, including the following: (1) two narratives respectively titled
Description of Proposed Change(s) and Reasons for Changes(s); (2) eight (8)
photographs documenting existing conditions; a “Site Plan” prepared by Claudia
Brenner, architect and dated January 22, 2024; and a “Survey Map” of the subject
property, prepared by Sheive Land Surveying and dated March 10, 2024, and
WHEREAS, the ILPC has also reviewed the New York State Building-Structure Inventory
Form for 209 Eddy Street, and the City of Ithaca’s East Hill Historic District
Summary Statement, and
WHEREAS, as stated in the narrative Description of Proposed Change(s), the project involves
the construction of a five-car parking area and associated driveway in the rear and
side yards of the property, with access from Catherine Street and through the rear
yard of the adjacent property at 211 Eddy Street, and
WHEREAS, additional application materials amending the original proposal were submitted by
the applicant on March 1, 2024, including a letter from the applicant to the ILPC
and a revised site plan sketch showing the proposed site modifications, and
WHEREAS, as stated in the applicant’s letter and shown in the revised site plan sketch, the
project now includes the installation of gravel paving to create two parking spaces
and an associated driveway behind the residence, and
WHEREAS, consideration of the application was tabled at the April 28, 2024, meeting, as the
Commission required additional information to complete their review of the
proposal, and
WHEREAS, revised application materials were submitted on May 14, 2024 and included a
detailed site plan prepared by the Claudia Brenner, architect, titled “Parking Plan”
and dated May 14, 2024, and
Approved on: 8/20/2024
WHEREAS, the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness is a Type II Action under the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance for which no further environmental review is required,
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate
impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing for the purpose of considering approval of the Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC
meeting on April 23, 2024, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and
the proposal:
As identified in the City of Ithaca’s East Hill Historic District Summary
Statement, the period of significance for the area now known as the East Hill
Historic District is 1830-1932.
As indicated in the New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form, the
Queen Anne Style residence at 209 Eddy Street was constructed between 1882
and 1893.
Constructed within the period of significance of the East Hill Historic District and
possessing a high level of integrity, the property is a contributing element of the
East Hill Historic District.
In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new
construction, or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine
that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on
the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance and value of either the
landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring
improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural
value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is
consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of
the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-6 of the Municipal
Code. In making this determination, the Commission is guided by the
principles set forth in Section 228-6B of the Municipal Code, as further
elaborated in Section 228-6C, and by the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for Rehabilitation, and in this case specifically the following
principles and Standards:
Approved on: 8/20/2024
Principle #2 The historic features of a property located within, and
contributing to the significance of, an historic district shall be altered as little
as possible and any alterations made shall be compatible with both the
historic character of the individual property and the character of the district
as a whole.
Principle #3 New construction located within an historic district shall be
compatible with the historic character of the district within which it is
located.
Standard #2 The historic character of a property will be retained and
preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features and
spaces that characterize a property will be avoided.
Standard #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction
shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new
work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the
massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic
integrity of the property and its environment.
Standard #10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall
be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential
form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be
unimpaired.
With respect to Principle #2, Standard #2, and Standard #9, the construction of the
proposed parking area and associated driveway will not remove distinctive
materials and will not alter features and spaces that characterize the property.
The topography, landscaping, and yard areas of the East Hill Historic District are
character-defining features of the district. The subject property is located at a
pivotal juncture between areas to the north where alterations to the historic
environment have occurred and areas to the south where they have not, essentially
serving as a buffer between those two zones. Therefore, the construction of new,
large paved areas within the rear yards of this property required careful
consideration. In making a determination about the appropriateness of the
proposal, the Commission considered the historic development of the property
and East Hill during the district’s period of significance and the visual impact of
the proposal on the character of the neighborhood. 209 Eddy Street was
constructed as a single-family home in the late-19th century, a time before the
proliferation of motor vehicles. As motor vehicles became more popular during
the early-20th century, parking areas for one or two cars were constructed
alongside or behind many single-family homes. Unlike many of its counterparts in
Approved on: 8/20/2024
the neighborhood, a parking area was not constructed at 209 Eddy Street likely
due to the topography of and limited access to the site. There is currently no off-
street parking at this property, and it is used as a multiple residence. Given this
historic development pattern noted above, the Commission determined it is
appropriate to install a gravel-paved area large enough to accommodate two
vehicles in the rear yard of the property, a number consistent with the original
single-family use of the property and the parking areas installed during the
district’s period of significance.
With respect to the visual impact of the proposal, the Commission noted that the
rear yard of this property is not highly visible from the public way due to the steep
topography of the site. The new gravel-paved area will also be screened from
view by a fence or vegetative plantings. Vehicles will access the new parking
area from an existing drive on Catherine Street, resulting in no changes to the
streetscape on either Eddy or Catherine Streets.
Also with respect to Principle #2, Principle #3, and Standard #9, the proposed
parking area and associated driveway is compatible with the massing, size, scale,
and architectural features of the property and its environment.
With respect to Standard #10, the proposed parking area and associated driveway
can be removed in the future without impairment of the essential form and
integrity of the historic property and its environment.
RESOLVED, that, based on the findings set forth above, the proposal will not have a substantial
adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the 209
Eddy Street and the East Hill Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-6, and
be it further,
RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal
meets criteria for approval under Section 228-6 of the Municipal Code, and be it
further
RESOLVED, that the ILPC approves the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness with
the following condition(s):
• A screening plan shall be submitted to ILPC staff for consideration and
approval.
RECORD OF VOTE:
Moved by: D. Kramer,
Seconded by: S. Gibian
In Favor: D. Kramer, S. Gibian, A. Smith, E. Finegan
Approved on: 8/20/2024
Against: K. Olson
Abstain: 0
Absent: J. Smith, S. Stein
Vacancies: 0
B. 601 East State Street, East Hill Historic District—Exterior Finish Materials as Required
Conditions Placed on Certificate of Appropriateness 11-8-2023.
Architect Mike Barnoski for Trade Design Build presented on behalf of property owner Modern
Living Rentals. M. Barnoski stated that the project team is seeking approval from the
Commission for the exterior finish material for the new building, a condition placed on the
Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the Commission. He noted the proposed use of pre-
painted wood siding, asphalt shingles, k-style gutters, 1”x 6” ship lap wood for the porch ceiling.
He also noted the proposed use of Jeld-Wen doors, Anderson A-Series Windows (fiberglass-clad
wood). The exterior foundation walls will have a stucco finish. M. Barnoski stated that the
materials for the parklet are still being worked out.
D. Kramer left the meeting at 6:40 PM.
RESOLUTION: 601 East State Street, East Hill Historic District–Proposal to Construct a
Two-Story, Wood-Framed, Multi-Family Residence in the Rear Yard of the Property.
(Condition Placed on Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the ILPC on October 17,
2023)
WHEREAS, 601 East State Street is located in the East Hill Historic District, as designated
under Section 228-3 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code in 1989, and as listed
on the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places in 1989, and
WHEREAS, a Certificate of Appropriateness was issued at the regularly scheduled Ithaca
Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) meeting on October 17, 2023 for the
construction of a two-story, wood-framed, multi-family residence in the southeast
corner of the rear yard of the subject property, and the construction of a patio
area, retaining walls, and walkways in the northeast corner of the property, and
WHEREAS, the following condition(s) were placed on the Certificate of Appropriateness:
• The applicant shall submit to the ILPC the following for consideration and
approval: north, south, east and west elevation drawings; a detailed site plan;
detail drawings (including both elevations and sections) for all architectural
and hardscape details); a materials schedule and product specifications for all
building materials, products and elements, including, but not limited to, doors
windows, railings, lighting, and siding; and samples for all building and
hardscape materials, and
Approved on: 8/20/2024
WHEREAS, materials were submitted for consideration by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation
Commission by Trade Design Build on behalf of property owner Modern Living
Rentals on May 21, 2024, to satisfy the above noted condition(s); the submitted
33-page presentation includes a “Project Description,” “Existing Site Plan,” “Site
Plan, “Landscape Plan,” “Material Selection” schedule, “Elevation -East”
drawing, “Elevation – West” drawing, “Elevation – North” drawing, “Elevation –
South (sic)” drawing, “Details – Window Trim 1” drawing, “Details – Windows
Trim 2 (sic)” drawing, “Details – Porch Column Trim” drawing, ten “3D Views”
renderings, product information for Anderson A-Series windows, and Jeld-Wen
Design-Pro™ Smooth-Pro™ Direct Glazed Exterior Fiberglass Doors, now
therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and
the proposal:
In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new
construction, or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine
that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on
the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance and value of either the
landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring
improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural
value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is
consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of
the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-5 of the Municipal
Code. In making this determination, the Commission is guided by the
principles set forth in Section 228-5B of the Municipal Code, as further
elaborated in Section 228-5C, and by the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for Rehabilitation, and in this case specifically the following
principles and Standards:
Principle #3 New construction located within an historic district shall be
compatible with the historic character of the district within which it is
located.
Standard #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction
shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new
work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the
massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic
integrity of the property and its environment.
With respect to Principle #3 and Standard #9, the proposed exterior cladding
materials and finishes are compatible with the historic character of the East Hill
Approved on: 8/20/2024
Historic District, and more specifically, with the massing, size, scale, and
architectural features of the property and its environment.
Also with respect to Standard #9, the proposed addition will be differentiated
from surrounding historic structures through the use of contemporary construction
techniques, materials and detailing.
RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission approves the exterior
cladding and finish materials and design changes, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the conditions placed on the Certificate of Appropriateness and noted above
have not been fully met, and be it further
RESOLVED, a detailed site plan, materials schedule, and material samples for the proposed
patio area must be submitted to the ILPC for consideration to satisfy the above
noted condition placed on the Certificated of Appropriateness.
RECORD OF VOTE:
Moved by: S. Gibian
Seconded by: A. Smith
In Favor: S. Gibian, A. Smith, K. Olson, E. Finegan
Against: 0
Abstain: 0
Absent: J. Smith, S. Stein, D. Kramer
Vacancies: 0
C. 607-611 East State Street, East Hill Historic District--Proposal to Consolidate Two
Window Openings on the North Elevation and Install a Single Window Meeting Egress
Requirements
The Commission reviewed a request from the applicant to extend the review period for the
Certificate of Appropriateness Application submitted for the above noted project.
RESOLUTION: Certificate of Appropriateness Application Review Extension, 607-611
East State Street, East Hill Historic District – Proposal to Consolidate Two Window
Opening on the North Elevation and Install a Single Window Meeting Egress
Requirements.
WHEREAS, 607-611 East State Street is located within the East Hill Historic District, as
designated under Section 228-3 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code in 1988, and
listed on the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places in 1986,
and
Approved on: 8/20/2024
WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-7(F) of the Municipal Code, “The Commission shall
approve, deny, or approve with conditions or modifications the Certificate of
Appropriateness within 45 days from the completion of the public hearing, unless
an extension is mutually agreed upon in writing by the applicant and the
Commission,” and
WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, an Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness, dated December 19, 2023, was submitted for
review to the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) by Greg
Tumbarello on behalf of property owner 609 East State Street, LLC, and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Public Hearing for the aforesaid Application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness on January 16, 2024, the Commission made a
finding of fact that the circumstances of the application required further time for
additional study and information than could be obtained within the aforesaid 45-
day period and extended the review period to 90 days as permitted by Section
228-7(F) (1) the Commission, and
WHERERAS, the applicant was unable to produce the requested additional information within
the 90-day review period, and
WHEREAS, a written request for an extension of the Certificate of Appropriateness review
period for this project was submitted to the ILPC by Greg Tumbarello on behalf
of property owner 609 East State Street, LLC on April 12, 2024, now therefore be
it
RESOLVED, that the ILPC agrees to the request for the extension of the Certificate of
Appropriateness review for a period of 90 days.
RECORD OF VOTE:
Moved by: S. Gibian
Seconded by: K. Olson
In favor: S. Gibian, K. Olson, A. Smith, E. Finegan
Against: 0
Abstain: 0
Absent: D. Kramer, S. Stein, J. Smith
Vacancies: 0
VI. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
• B. McCracken advised the board that the Historic Ithaca Annual Preservation Award
nomination deadline is July 22, 2024. He encouraged the members to submit
nominations.
Approved on: 8/20/2024
VII. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by K. Olson, seconded by A. Smith, the meeting was adjourned unanimously at
6:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Bryan McCracken, Historic Preservation Planner