HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.15.2023-Agenda1
Zoom Link 4118425407
Village of Cayuga Hights Board of Trustees Monthly Meeting
March 15, 2023 7:00 p.m.
EXHIBIT/PAGE
1. Call To Order
2. Approval of February 15, 2023 Meeting Minutes 2023 - 139 pgs. 2-27
3. Report of the Fire Superintendent Tamborelle: Submitted Report 2023 - 140 pgs. 28-29
a. RFP Bid Results
4. Privilege of the Floor:
5. Report of Treasurer Dolch: Submitted Report 2023 - 141 pgs. 30-32
6. Report of Mayor Woodard
a. VCH Annual Court Report 2023 - 142 pgs. 33-41
b. VCH Annual Historians Report 2023 - 143 pgs. 42-43
c. Schedule the Annual Village Organization Meeting
d. Proposed FYE 2023-2024 Budget
e. Schedule a Public Hearing on Proposed FYE 2023-2024 Budget
f. VCH and Town of Ithaca Court Coverage Agreement 2023 - 144 pgs. 44-46
g. Appointment of Devin Dilts as the Village Labor Attorney
7. Report of Superintendent of Public Works Cross: Submitted Report 2023 - 145 pgs. 47
8. Report of the Trustees:
a. Templeton Sunset Park Proposal 2023 -146 pgs.48-50
9. Report of Police Chief Wright: Submitted Report 2023 -147 pgs. 51-52
10. Report of Director of Public Works Wiese: Submitted Report 2023 - 148 pg. 53-54
11. Report of Clerk Walker: Submitted Report 2023 - 149 pg. 55
12. Report of Village Attorney:
13. Adjournment
2
EXHIBIT 2023-139
VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHT February 15, 2022
Zoom ID # 411842540 BOARD OF TRUSTEES 7:00 p.m.
MONTHLY MEETING
Present: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbard, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton; Village
Engineer B. Cross; Director of Public Works Wiese; Police Chief Wright; Clerk Walker; Treasurer Dolch;
Attorney Marcus; Planning Board Chair Cowett, Planning Board Member M. McMurry.
1. Call to Order: Mayor Woodard calls the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Approval of Meeting Minutes: January 18, 2023 (Exhibit 2023-129)
Resolution: 9346
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees approves January 18, 2023,
Board Meeting Minutes as presented.
Motion: Trustee Biloski
Second: Trustee Marshall
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton
Nays: none
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
3. Report of Fire Superintendent Tamborelle: Submitted Report (Exhibit 2023-130)
•Fire Superintendent Tamborelle states that the fire station is running smoothly.
•Fire Superintendent Tamborelle states that the annual fire department banquet will be held on April 22, 2023, at
Lakewatch Inn.
•Fire Superintendent Tamborelle states that he would like Board approval to host a fire station movie night on May
13, 2023, for the Cayuga Heights Elementary School (CHES) Fifth Grade class. All proceeds would go to the
class trip at the end of the school year.
•Trustee Robinson states that the Cayuga Heights Elementary School (CHES) has still not removed the storage
containers on the property, and he is going to abstain from voting on this resolution as a protest since the school
has ignored our request to remove the containers. we should include an option for pricing ice and water shield
over 100 % of the surface area. He has seen this method used in many non-residential buildings.
•Fire Superintendent Tamborelle states that this is just to support the fifth-grade field trip.
3
•Trustee Rennekamp states that she is a parent of a fifth-grade student at Cayuga Heights Elementary School
(CHES) and she will be voting yes for this event. She further states that in the past the CHES PTA has provided
more of the funding for this trip but has now cut back substantially.
Fire Superintendent Tamborelle states that the students have nothing to do with the storage containers.
Resolution: 9347
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees authorizes and approves the
CHFD hosting a CHES fifth grade fundraiser movie night on May 13, 2023, and waives the special event permit
fee.
Motion: Trustee Biloski
Second: Trustee Marshall
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, and Rennekamp
Nays: Trustees Robinson, and Salton
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
4. Privilege of the Floor: No Members of the Public Wished to Speak.
5. Report of Treasurer Dolch: Submitted Report (Exhibit 2023-131)
•Village Treasurer Dolch states that the January bank-to-book reconciliation is complete.
•Village Treasurer Dolch states that in January the Village paid the Town of Ithaca $122,402.91 for Sewer Services in
2020. We had not budgeted for this expense in the 2022-2023 fiscal year. Additionally, we will owe another $83,602.05 to
the Town of Ithaca as part of the final plant-to-plant agreement. Therefore, we will need a resolution to move those funds
from the sewer account savings to sewer contingency.
Resolution: 9348
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees authorizes and approves Village
Treasurer Dolch to move $206,004.96 (122402.91 + 83,602.05) from NYCLASS Savings to Sewer
Contingency (G1990.400 ) to fund WWTP – Purchase Sewer Services (G8130.480)
Motion: Trustee Robinson
Second: Trustee Salton
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton
Nays: none
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
Approval of Abstract 9:
4
Resolution: 9349
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees authorizes and approves
Abstract #9 for FYE2023 consisting of TA vouchers 67-74 in the amount of 14,764.92 and Consolidated Fund
vouchers 617- 690 in the amount of $289,297.45 and the Treasurer is instructed to make payments thereon.
Motion: Trustee Rennekamp
Second: Trustee Robinson
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton
Nays: none
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
6. Report of Mayor Woodard:
a. Public Hearing on Proposed Local Law C of 2023- Property Tax Exemption for Volunteer Fire
Fighters and Ambulance Workers. Governor Hochul signed legislation that permits any local government to
provide a real property tax exemption to volunteer firefighters and volunteer ambulance workers who have
served a minimum of two years (see Chapter 670 of the Laws of 2022). The law took effect immediately and
can be implemented now by governing bodies.
•Mayor Woodard opens the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m.
•Mayor Woodard closes the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m.
Resolution: 9350
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees adopts Proposed Local Law C
of 2023 as Local Law #3 of 2023.
a Property Tax Exemption
for Volunteer Firefighters and Ambulance Workers Pursuant to
Section 466-a of the Real Property Tax Law
Section 1.
A new Article_ of Chapter _of the Code of the Village of Cayuga Heights, entitled “Volunteer Firefighters
and Ambulance Workers Exemption,” is hereby enacted pursuant to Real Property Tax Law Section 466-a,
to read as follows:
Volunteer Firefighters and Ambulance Workers Exemption
Grant of exemption.
An exemption of 10% (ten) of assessed value of property owned by an enrolled member as set forth below, or
such enrolled member and their spouse, is hereby granted from taxation with respect to the real property taxes
of the Village of Cayuga Heights and Town of Ithaca as long as eligibility requirements are met.
Eligibility requirements.
5
Such exemption shall be granted to an enrolled member of an incorporated volunteer fire company, fire
department, or incorporated voluntary ambulance service provided that:
A. The property is owned by the volunteer firefighter or volunteer ambulance worker;
B. The property is the primary residence of the volunteer firefighter or volunteer ambulance worker;
C. The property is used exclusively for residential purposes;
D. The volunteer firefighter or volunteer ambulance worker resides in the Village of Cayuga Heights and the
Town of Ithaca is served by such incorporated volunteer fire company or fire department or incorporated
voluntary ambulance service;
E. The volunteer firefighter or volunteer ambulance worker is certified by the authority having jurisdiction
as an enrolled member of such an incorporated volunteer fire company, fire department, or incorporated
voluntary ambulance service; and
F. The volunteer firefighter or volunteer ambulance worker meets the minimum service requirement
established by Vi, which is hereby established as two years.
Application.
A volunteer firefighter or volunteer ambulance worker must annually, on or before the applicable taxable
status date, file an application for such property tax exemption with the assessor responsible for preparing the
assessment roll for the Village of Cayuga Heights, on a form as prescribed by the New York State
Commissioner of Taxation and Finance. The Village of Cayuga Heights must maintain written guidelines,
available upon request, as to the requirements of an enrolled volunteer member relating to this exemption.
Certification.
The Village Treasurer must annually file with the assessor, prior to the applicable taxable status date, a list of the
active volunteer members who are certified to meet the minimum service requirement. Such list must provide,
as of the applicable taxable status date, the number of years of service served by each such enrolled member
and such enrolled member's address of residence.
No diminution of benefits.
An applicant who is receiving any benefit pursuant to Article 4 of the Real Property Tax Law as of the
effective date of this article shall not have any of those benefits diminished because of this article.
Grant of lifetime exemption.
Any eligible enrolled member who accrues more than 20 years of active volunteer service (as certified by the
authority having jurisdiction) shall be granted the 10% exemption as authorized by this article for the
remainder of his or her life as long as his or her primary residence is located within the Village of Cayuga
Heights.
Un-remarried spouse of enrolled member killed in the line of duty.
6
The un-remarried surviving spouse of a deceased enrolled member killed in the line of duty, as certified by the
authority having jurisdiction, is qualified to continue to receive an exemption, as long as the deceased volunteer
had been an enrolled member for at least five years and had been receiving the exemption at the time of his or
her death.
Un-remarried spouse of deceased enrolled member.
The un-remarried surviving spouse of a deceased enrolled member, as certified by the authority having
jurisdiction, is qualified to continue to receive an exemption, as long as the deceased volunteer had been an
enrolled member for at least 20 years and the deceased volunteer and un-remarried spouse had been receiving
the exemption at the time of his or her death.
Motion: Trustee Marshall
Second: Trustee Biloski
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton
Nays: none
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
b. CSI Community Science Institute: CSI has been providing testing services for the Village Wastewater
Treatment Plant. CSI is also looking for funding from the Village outside of the fee for services.
•Mayor Woodard states that the following municipalities are contributing to CSI; Tompkins County $34,000,
Cayuga County$ 20,012, Town of Ithaca $21,957, Town of Dryden $10,976, City of Ithaca $10,372, Town of
Lansing $7,000, Town of Ulysses $6,312, Town of Newfield $6,278, Town of Danby $4,206, Town of Caroline
$3,299, Town of Enfield $2,500 and the Town of Hector in the amount of $1,000.
•Mayor Woodard states that we have not contributed to them in the past.
•Trustee Hubbell asks if there is a certain formula on how much to contribute.
•Village Attorney R. Marcus states that none of the Villages in Tompkins County are listed as contributing to
CSI.
•Mayor Woodard states that we do pay taxes to the Town of Ithaca and therefore just keep paying CSI for
services.
•Trustee Marshall states that he recalls that these numbers are annual donations and CSI does not recall ever
getting anything from the Village of Cayuga Heights.
•Mayor Woodard states that she wanted to bring this to the Boards attention and will further discuss this at the
Village Budget Workshop on March 25, 2023.
c. Clean Energy Communities Program Selection: The Board will need to commit to spending the $5,000
grant award on a particular project. Exhibit 2023-135 list all the possible projects.
•Trustee Robinson states that since the Village WWTP was not awarded a grant to convert all lighting at the
WWTP to LEDs. could we use this money for that project?
7
•Village Climate Smart Taskforce Chair A. Wagenenknecht-Wiesner states that we could use this money for a
lighting conversion at the WWTP and or split the money up.
•Clerk Walker states that the commitment letter is pretty straightforward so modifications can be made to reflect
one or more than one projects.
Resolution: 9351
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees authorizes and approves using
the $5,000 Climate Smart Communities Grant Funds for upgrading municipal building lights to LEDs and also
to install lighting sensors with smart technology thermostats.
Motion: Trustee Hubbell
Second: Trustee Robinson
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton
Nays: none
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
d. Plant to Plant Contract: After two years of negotiations the Intermunicipal Wastewater Transportation and
Treatment Agreement has been completed and is ready for us to sign.
•Mayor Woodard states that all parties involved will be paying an annual fee of $10,550 as payment if we run
into a situation we need to open the Kline Road by-pass. We will also pay three times the Ithaca rate for all
sewage they treat from the Kline Road by-pass.
•Mayor Woodard states that there will also be a fee for “carrying costs”. The equation used will be the
highest total gallons directed down the by-pass in a 24-hour period divided by 13.1 million gallons, which is the
DEC permit gallons per day monthly average for the Ithaca plant.
•Mayor Woodard states that going forward, Lectre will identify any missing data in the record. Invoices will be
prepared quarterly and for gaps longer than 3 hours, the average flow during this period will be used.
•Mayor Woodard states that in 2025 the contract will have to be re-negotiated based on the fact that the bond
financing that was secured in 2003 will expire in 2025.
•Village Attorney R. Marcus states that a normal contract term would not extend past five years.
•Trustee Marshall asks how many months of history will be looked at when re-negotiations take place.
•Mayor Woodard states that we will receive data every three months and we will have up to two years’ worth
before negotiations begin.
Resolution: 9352
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees approves the Plant-to-Plant
Agreement as presented and authorizes Mayor Woodard to sign the agreement and distribute the signed contract
8
to all parties involved.
Motion: Trustee Robinson
Second: Trustee Marshall
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton
Nays: none
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
7. Report of Superintendent of Public Works Cross:
•B. Cross states that one point that should be made on the Plant-to-Plant Agreement is that we now begin a sixty-day window to
prepare a revision to our local sewer ordinance.
•B. Cross states that this will incorporate the Ithaca area Industrial Pre-Treatment standards into our enforcement of any potential
sewage from the "Old Village" to the IAWWTF.
•Mayor Woodard states that we will need to schedule a Public Hearing at the March Board meeting for this proposed local law.
•Village Attorney R. Marcus states that we would not pass a local law until after IAWWTF has had time to
review this proposed local law.
•B. Cross states that GHD Engineering Firm will be drafting the language for this proposed local law.
8. Report of the Trustees:
a. Village Comprehensive Plan:
•Trustee Salton states that as a requirement the Village is obligated to review the Village Comprehensive Plan
every ten years. That date is next year and in order to prepare for that discussion and any changes a Village
Taskforce or Committee should be organized.
•Trustee Salton states that the housing changes coming from NYS will directly affect our Village.
•Trustee Salton states that he would like to participate along with, Planning Board Chair F. Cowett, Planning
Board Member M. McMurry, Village Historian B. Szekely, and members of the public.
•Trustee Robinson states that if there is going to be a monetary obligation then we should start talking about
this.
•Planning Board Chair F. Cowett states that George Frantz was a consultant, and it would be a good idea to seek
a different fresh point of view.
•Trustee Marshall states that an important part of the comprehensive plan is to develop long-term goals and
objectives then we should consider age.
•Village Attorney R. Marcus states that revising and reviewing the current comprehensive plan should amount
to a fraction of the time compared to its creation.
9
•Village Attorney R. Marcus states that the comprehensive plans act as a road map for any future zoning
changes. In other words, any zoning changes the Village makes during the lifetime of the comprehensive plans
have to conform to the comprehensive plan.
b. Cayuga Lake Watershed Intermunicipal Organization:
•Trustee Hubbell states that the February meeting has been canceled due to COVID.
c. Sunset Park Update:
•Trustee Marshall states that at the March 15, 2023 Board meeting there will be a formal grant application
seeking Board approval for sunset park.
•Trustee Marshall also states that April 1, 2023, will be the beginning of the notifications for the public meeting
to be held on May 7, 2023.
d. Reserve Accounts:
•Trustee Robinson states that at this month's Village Finance Committee Meeting, it was discussed moving
forward with creating reserve accounts and there will be more information at the budget workshop.
Walking Safe Cayuga Heights Sidewalk Design Plan Discussion 8:00 p.m.
•Mayor Woodard welcomes members of the community present in person and online via Zoom.
•Mayor Woodard states that the design plan is 90% completed. Bidding documents have not been produced yet
and moving this project to the North side of the road is not an affordable option. Tonight, the Board will be
considering a resolution that will allow Fisher and Associates to proceed to produce the bidding documents and
incorporate any refinements.
•Mayor Woodard introduces former Trustee and current Planning Board Member Meloney McMurry who was
instrumental in this project.
•Former Trustee and current Planning Board Member M. McMurry distributes a printout of the existing
conditions and reads the following:
My name is Meloney McMurry. I have been involved in the Walking Safe sidewalk project since roughly 2016
when Mayor Supron created the Bike-Ped committee with the specific goal of making the Village safer and
more accessible to bicyclists and pedestrians. Our priority was to fill the gaps in our sidewalk network, with a
specific focus on the routes children use to walk to school—a goal identified in our Comprehensive Plan, which
was adopted in 2014.
When we decided to apply for our first federal grant, we chose a smaller project that would have a high impact
as Kline and Wyckoff Roads are commonly used as the most direct route for kids walking to the middle and high
schools, as well as to our local Community Nursery School.
10
Our application under the Transportation Alternatives Program was supported by 14 representatives of
adjacent municipalities, schools, PTAs, and universities. 125 members of the public signed a petition indicating
their support for the sidewalk.
In addition to creating a safe route to school for our kids, the goal of this project is to build a sidewalk that will
allow everyone to walk and bicycle more safely, reduce conflicts between cars and pedestrians, reduce traffic
congestion and harmful auto emissions as more kids are able to walk to school rather than being driven by their
parents. Studies have shown that sidewalks increase overall physical activity in a community, and create
feelings of connection and social support.
A lot of time has passed since the Board of Trustees unanimously approved this project in 2018. Since then, we
have encountered a pandemic, historic levels of inflation, and unanticipated bureaucratic delays—which has
been frustrating--but has not changed the reason why we decided to build this sidewalk to start with.
•Emily Smith of Fisher and Associates introduces herself and states the goal of this project is to provide a safe
route to school and funding comes from the NYS Transportation Alternatives Program.
•E. Smith states that this type of funding source does not allow for improvements to roads, road calming
measures, and reconstruction of intersections. Because of that, funding did not include or require a traffic study
to be completed.
•E. Smith states that it is inherently understood that a sidewalk is safer than walking on the road or shoulder of
the road, so the number of vehicles, speed, and type of vehicles are not relevant to the solution for this project.
•E. Smith states that the design approval was granted for this project and the end of December 2022 and that is
when we cleared all of the alternatives analysis and performed SEQR Review. Now we are at the point where
90% plans have been developed.
•E. Smith states that all plans are assembled to NYSDOT standards which will provide for the most competitive
bid pricing since most contractors who do federal work are familiar with the process.
•Mayor Woodard states that online is Peter Wlodarczyk from Fisher and Associates and he will be handling any
technical questions related to this project.
•Mayor Woodard states that several emails were received and will be entered into the meeting minutes:
To neighbors:
Although the Village had anticipated receipt of the final drawings and a revised cost estimate from the
consultant in time for consideration at the Board of Trustees meeting tonight, the documentation has not yet
been delivered and therefore no discussion of this project will happen at tonight’s Trustee meeting as had
previously been advertised.
In the meantime, there is a copy of the final draft of the “Engineer’s Report” that has been posted on the
Village website under “Project” pull down menu and then the tab for “Walking Safe Cayuga Heights”. The
Final Engineers Report was approved by NYSDOT and has now authorized Fisher Associates to draw the final
plans and cost estimate.
11
Once we have the final plans in hand, I will reach out to the neighbors to share the information in advance of
the project being added to the next Board of Trustees meeting at which they will have an open discussion of the
project in a public meeting that you are welcome to attend. The goal of discussing the updated plans/cost at a
Trustee meeting is to make a final decision to have the plans put out for bidding. If all of that comes together in
a timely manner, the possibility would be to have the construction begin in the summer of 2023 with completion
by the end of 2023.
The intention of sharing the plans with you is to make sure that there are no details that need to be revised such
as pole locations, curb-cuts for driveways, drainage inlet/outlet, etc.
I know that I do not have every neighbor’s email, so feel free to share this with them or let me know their
address so that I can add them to the list. For anyone that I do not have an email, I will reach out to them by
phone or US mail.
Sincerely,
Brent
Dear Village Clerk Walker,
I support sidewalks in Cayuga Heights for the safety of our residents especially our children. I support the
Kline Road sidewalk and hope you can put in sidewalks on that part of Cayuga Heights Road near Route 13
and near the Cornell President’s house.
Best wishes,
Deirdre
Deirdre L. Hay (S.J.D.), Esq. (she/her/hers)
Jeff,
I support the Kline/Wyckoff Road Sidewalk project. Please proceed in a way that maximizes consideration for
the impacted property owners.
Thanks,
Derek Burrows
402 Cayuga Heights Road
Jeff Walker,
I am writing to you in support of the sidewalk on Kline and Wykoff Roads.
We have lived at 212 Overlook Rd for almost 13 years and have four children ranging in age from 20 to 12. We
have both accompanied and have sent our kids walking alone or with friends to Cayuga Heights Elementary
School, Boynton and IHS daily for these 13 school years. We are not eligible to get a bus to any of these schools
and we are happy to start and end the day with a walk. Both Kline and Wykoff (and all neighboring roads) are
narrow, steep, winding, and unsafe for pedestrians. We have tried many combinations of Kline Rd, Wykoff Rd,
Devon Rd, paths through Cornell lands, cutting through neighbors yards, as well as the road through the
12
cemetery. All of these routes require at least some time on roads without sidewalks, a lack of shoulders and
plenty of blind corners where cars cannot see pedestrians.
We have been waiting a long, long time for this sidewalk to be completed. Our third child is about to graduate
from IHS but we would love for our youngest to have a safe route to and from school for his remaining five
years in the ICSD. We are an enthusiastic vote of YES on this project.
Thank you,
Becca and Alex Hagen
212 Overlook Rd
Dear Brent,
Thanks for this message. Our property—404 Highland Road—abuts the North side of Kline road and the East
side of Overlook. We are curious why building the sidewalk on the North side of Kline was evidently ruled out
as an option for the Walk Safe project. It seems that it could be safer for pedestrians to walk on the North side
of Kline, which is a bit elevated, rather than the South side between Highland and Overlook and then cross over
Kline to the North side for the stretch between Overlook and Cayuga Heights Road. We have no objection to
building the sidewalk on the North side of Kline between Highland and Overlook, and in our opinion, it would
be safer for walkers to cross over at Overlook rather than to cross Kline at a point where drivers are
accelerating up Kline or are moving faster toward the bottom of that hill.
Also, it seems that a traffic study should be conducted before considering any of the options. Kline Road traffic
has increased significantly over the past 17 years, and the increase in heavy, wide-body truck traffic is a
potential hazard for walkers. At the very least, we believe that speed bumps should be considered in order to
enhance sidewalk safety.
Thank you,
Lisken and Jim Cordes
Dear Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees,
I'm writing on behalf of my family in strong support of the Safe Route to School project. We are unable to
attend the meeting on February 15th and respectfully submit this letter as we cannot speak at the public session.
We moved to Cayuga Heights from Lansing in June 2021. The biggest draw to this address is the proximity to
the public schools and to Cornell. Our older child attends Boynton and our younger child will enter sixth grade
next year. Our eighth grader is assigned a bus stop at the intersection of Kline and Cayuga Heights Rd. While
they are on a sidewalk from our house to the end of Oak Hill Road, we all have concerns about the walk beyond
Highland and down Kline where the road is winding and there is no sidewalk. Often, our child chooses to walk
all the way to Boynton rather than wait for the bus -- along Wyckoff without a sidewalk and then to the
cemetery path. No matter how many times we discuss walking without headphones and while alert, we all
worry about the potential for driver and pedestrian distraction on a path that our child must navigate daily.
In addition to concerns about our children walking down/up Kline and Wyckoff, I also had been an avid runner
and walker who enjoyed taking our dog along. A sidewalk along this path would not only benefit the safety of
pedestrians but also would be safer for drivers. On several occasions, I've driven up Wyckoff and Kline when
walkers were present (especially those with dogs on loose leashes) and felt concerned about how narrow the
13
road is with no "boundary." A sidewalk would be reassuring that pedestrians and drivers would each keep to
their "lane," so to speak.
I've recently encountered numerous health issues, and I will be unable to walk without assistance for many
months to come. While the geography of this path is a challenge in its own right, I am very aware that unless
there is a sidewalk, I'll be unable to even consider building up to walking to or from the schools as the only
"safe" option for pedestrians who encounter two cars passing in opposite directions along Kline is to step off
the road and onto the uneven shoulder.
We appreciate the careful planning that has gone into this project and sincerely hope that it is approved and
completed.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Lovenheim
105 Oak Hill Place
(781)248-7938
Jeff,
The Weebly site was recently updated and doesn't include the description that had originally outlined a
proactive and public/community-inclusive project approach.
How and when was the survey monkey survey shared? How many responses were received from the survey,
when were the responses shared and where can a log be viewed of the survey responses that were captured?
Since Randy and I live on the proposed project route we have been paying attention and are proactive
information seekers. The info that we receive about the project has been sporadically shared and is typically
only provided upon request. You referenced in our conversation that letters were sent out but we never received
a letter or letters about this project.
At the inception of the project, it was conveyed that there were plans for several public meetings and a defined
public outreach plan providing ALL Village residents an opportunity to share their opinions and comments
about the project. Is there a communication plan that was developed for the project that you share?
Last July (and again last Fall) when Randy and I (virtually) attended the Trustee Meeting and expressed
concerns about the project (including the lack of a traffic study) we were told (by Brent in the meeting and since
then), "The goal is to have a completed engineering report which will then produce a final design report for the
public to then make comments."
The final report just hit the website this week and now we learn that the meeting next week is to approve
the report so that it can go out to bid. So there won't be a meeting that is promoted ahead of time so that the
public can participate?
Is the opportunity "for the public to make comments" limited to those members of the public that Brent is
personally contacting. Are there records of Brent's visits with individual residents and the topics discussed?
As always Jeff, I appreciate your time providing info and sharing information. I will stay tuned for the grant file
info and any other documents and information that you can provide.
Thank you.
14
Tina
Hi Brent,
I have reviewed the drawings you shared. The current design document does not include enough information to
yield quality bids and construction. As you know, to receive comparative bids and construct a quality project,
construction documents must provide adequate detail. The goal of the documents is to convey a common
understanding of the work scope to bidders/contractors.
The current design lacks the appropriate number of elevations and sections to illustrate the site's complex
topography, features, and infrastructure. One outcome of this is that it is impossible to understand the project's
intended finished appearance. And, inaccuracies in the design indicate a lack of thoroughness and inattention
to detail.
We would be happy to meet with you to review the documents and contribute to their improvement to meet the
stated project goal of walking safe.
Randy
Thanks for your email. I am not sure who "told that FHWA rules advise not to publish". They are misinformed.
Here's a Section 106 Tutorial from the Federal Highway Administration
website: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/env_topics/section_106_tutorial/chapter4_1fig1_longdesc.aspx
. In particular, please note bullet four of Step 1 and bullet two Step 4.
The ACHP (Advisory Council on Historic Preservation) also has an Introduction to Section 106 process on
their website: https://www.achp.gov/protecting-historic-properties/section-106-process/assessing-effects If you
scroll to the bottom of the web page immediately before "THE SECTION 106 PROCESS CONCLUDES" it
states "The federal agency documents its finding, shares it with all consulting parties for a 30-day review
period, and makes information available to the public."
The FHWA Section 106 Tutorial and ACHP Introduction to Section 106 process are based upon Title 36, CFR,
Chapter VIII, Part 800. Please reference that here:
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-36/chapter-VIII/part-800?toc=1
My understanding was that you had concluded the federally required Section 106 process. Yet, without making
the results public, that is incorrect.
Additionally, my research has revealed that the following properties were identified as being potentially
affected by the project: 511 Kline Road, 201 Cayuga Heights Road, 102 Corson Place, 100 Sunset Park, 903
Wyckoff Road, and 701 Wyckoff Road. Each of these properties were studied by Fisher Associates'
subconsultant, Hartgen Archeological Associates, as a part of the Section 106 process. My property, 322
Highland Road, a contributing structure in the National Register Cornell Heights Historic District, does not
appear to have been identified or studied. Since my property will clearly be affected by the project, I am hopeful
that your completion of the process will help me understand why it was not included, or, if it must be included,
what determination is made.
I look forward to hearing your plan and schedule for completing the process.
15
I must agree with Randy here.
In addition if this to be constructed as drawn, our front yard is torn up all the way to the main entrance and we
have 6-ft sidewalks incurring into our driveways and front door walkway without any curb cuts. This is not
what we have discussed at length (and I even provided drawings) with you over the last several years. Without
additional detailing this will be quite disastrous along our stretch of Kline rd. We are all for walking safe at
511 Kline, but we really need to address this before too long.
Aleksandr Mergold, AIA, LEED AP
Architect
Co-founder of Austin+Mergold
M: 646-610-0014
www.mergold.work
Dear neighbors, Trustees and Village officials,
Having reviewed the drawings from Fischer currently posted on the village website, I can say (as a licensed
architect in NYS) that they are incomplete. They also do not accurately (or at all) take into account the most
recent input I provided to Brent, input on which he agreed and promised to relay to Fischer. Nor could they
possibly result in an accurate price estimate—they are simply too vague, lacking detail and critical elements
that will no doubt be added in later via change orders. The actual price to build a project that is safe for
pedestrians and bicyclists, that provides adequate stormwater management, that will not incur legal action, is
far higher than an estimate on this set of drawings. Holding a vote to accept such an estimate and move
forward shows poor stewardship of Village resources and taxpayer moneys. It is a waste of valuable time for all
parties—Trustees and residents included.
To move forward productively, the drawings first need to reflect what we have been discussing with Brent for
nearly two years at this point. They need more detail, and more information. As an example, along our property
alone, the drawings do not show any curb cuts in front of driveways, nor do they show any detail of what a curb
cut may look like. A section that I saw that isn’t part of this set showed storm water directed towards our house
and PL-5 suggests the complete destruction of our front yard (and seemingly beyond the ROW - the drawings
do not clearly show property or ROW lines, so impossible to judge) for the sidewalk installation. I suspect that
similar issues exist throughout the path of the sidewalk.
I think the affected neighbors should all meet together with Brent (rather than individually, as has been
happening to this point) to discuss the drawings and what’s missing. Fischer needs to revise and amend the set
accordingly, and only then it is worth discussion with the trustees.
And we certainly welcome Lisken Cordes’ note about the sidewalk on the north side. The north option was
originally presented to us as a more expensive that that will result in the road being even closer to our house.
As I recall the difference between the two options in price was well within the margin of contingency allowance,
so we are certainly happy to discuss the north sidewalk again, as long as it does not shift the road closer to our
front steps – that’s simply dangerous, given the increased traffic we’ve been having on Kline.
In principle, over the course of the project we have made and have heard from others several suggestions that
would be a major improvement to how this project is administered:
1.Hire a Project manager that is dedicated to this specific project. This would help Brent tremendously. TG
Miller, for example.
16
2. Consider a traffic study – why this never happened is unclear but this type of work certainly would benefit
tremendously. Numerous times we suggested a one-way designation for Kline Rd – a traffic study
would evaluate its validity. One way certainly opens up a vast opportunity to use this grant moneys
toward better, more durable, more attractive, more sustainable ways of making a sidewalk. Bike
lanes, for example.
3.Reshape the turn from Highland to Kline, especially from the north – it extremely tight now, and requires
a 3-way (or more) turn often.
Aleksandr Mergold, AIA, LEED AP
Architect
Co-founder of Austin+Mergold
T: 646-610-0014
www.mergold.work
Dear Jeff Walker,
I am writing to let you know that I highly support the 'Safe Route to School' initiative to create safe walking for
our students, children, and community!
Please continue the construction of our proposed sidewalks.
Thank you,
-Maki
Maki Inada (she/her)
Dear Board of Trustees,
As a Village resident, parent, member of the Planning Board, and co-author of the original grant application let
me urge you in the strongest not to abandon the important pedestrian connection we envisioned and secured
partial funding for along Kline and Wyckoff Roads. I knew how important this connection was for our Village
residents, and most critically for our Boynton and Ithaca High School students, back when we penned this
proposal, even though at the time as a mother of elementary school-age kids I didn’t use this route much myself.
Now, with a current Boynton student, I have occasion to observe this stretch very regularly and my feelings
about the importance of these planned improvements has only deepened. I am in fact compelled to drive my
older child to school every morning because I have concerns for her safety walking this route without any
sidewalks. As a driver it can be quite hard to spot all the dog walkers, joggers, and school kids along the edges
of this somewhat narrow, and often very dark and steep stretch, and some cars zip through this area, meeting
traffic on the narrow winding stretch seemingly without any awareness of the presence of pedestrians who have
little to no shoulder onto which to seek refuge when a car comes barreling by. I fear that a tragedy along this
route is only a matter of time unless the planned structural safety improvements are made.
The negotiated agreement allowing pedestrians to use the Cemetery path provides a great cost saving
alternative to needing to construct sidewalks along the full length of the stretch to the schools, and the funding
for sidewalks along Cayuga Heights Road also makes completing this critical segment on Kline/Wyckoff
particularly critical. Let’s give the Village’s Middle and High School students a complete and safe route to
school and improve the walking environment for all our residents in the process.
Thank you.
17
Best,
Jenny
Jenny Leijonhufvud (she/her)
Village of Cayuga Heights Resident
Village of Cayuga Heights Planning Board Member
•Village resident A. Mergold states that he is concerned about the process that took place and as an architect,
the current drawing does not reflect a single curb cut. He also states that he is concerned about the identity of
the Village with this project. He states that there are five different curve styles currently in the Village so what
will this project use?
•Village resident A. Mergold states that he supports the idea of safe streets and sidewalks but feels the Village is
rushing to spend this money without looking at the bigger picture.
•Village resident H. Kuckes read a letter she submitted to the Board.
Dear Trustees and Village Officials,
Thank you Brent for coming to meet with me and my son Dylan Kuckes at 100 Sunset Park, and for providing a copy of
the Fischer drawings for the project.
While it is clear that the drawings were lacking in many details, they did provide some information on the layout of the
proposed project.
As you realize The house and landscape of 100 Sunset are historically significant. I would like to see a design that
considers the impact on my property while meeting the needs of the Walk Safe sidewalk project.
18
The proposed design negatively impacts the landscaping through both location and design. We would like to see the
sidewalk location closer to the road rather than abutting the birch trees and crossing the driveway close to the house.
Locating the sidewalk at a distance from the road consistent with its location immediately downhill from my property
would meet this objective. The sidewalk at that point is closer to the road and not as wide in comparison as shown in the
drawings.
I am the second owner of the house, having bought it from Professor Miller in 1996. Professor Miller commissioned the
design of the house from Cornell School of Architecture Professors Wells and Canfield. They designed a few other
important midcentury houses in the Village.
Part of the designs included landscaping. Professor Miller was very hands-on in the design of the house, and his
specialty was landscaping and gardening. He did much grafting of nut trees and incorporated the birch trees as a
significant feature.
Even though the birch trees by the sidewalk need trimming, they are an integral feature of this beautiful mid-century
modern house. A design providing space for the trees is strongly preferred and would keep this historic village property
looking as it was designed to look
Thank you,
Haralyn Kuckes
100 Sunset Park
19
•H. Kuckes states that she hopes that there will be more attention paid to Sunset Park and raises a concern about
what the actual home address is since it has been through some changes over the last few years.
•Mayor Woodard states that the Board has budgeted money to revitalize Sunset Park.
•Trustee Robinson states that we know what the address should be but some of the other search engines have
confused that issue.
•Village resident D. Kuckes states that he thinks it is great that the Village is providing a safe way for kids to
get to school. He also feels that the Village needs to be respectful and considerate of those affected by this
project.
•Village resident D. Kuckes states that when he looked at the Walking Safe Cayuga Heights drawings it seems
that some of this project will have 6-5 foot wide sidewalks. Another aspect of concern is the proper placement
of the sidewalk compared to the Village Right-of-way. As others have stated consistency is preferred on the
width of our Village sidewalks.
•Village resident T. Kuckes states that he would like to echo what his grandmother and father have stated.
•T. Kuckes states that he supports the project but has concerns with the size of the sidewalk and how it complies
with the ADA standards.
•Village resident Tina Lacey states that she appreciated the effort by the Village but has serious concerns about
the lack of public outreach, the ability to find information on the website, and little to no outreach to all
members affected by this project.
•T. Lacey states that since we met with the Mayor in November the Village has been updating information but it
is still hard to get through all the documents and now we find out that the Board is not sending the project out to
bid as described before this meeting but that these plans are only 90% plans.
•T. Lacey states that we were told in July of 2022 that no decisions had been made on which side of Kline Road
the project was going to be constructed. She has read through years of meeting minutes and cannot find where
the south side of the road was selected.
•T. Lacey states that the volume of truck traffic through this area is very concerning. People are not going to be
safe on this side of the road and the Village needs to revisit that alternative.
•T. Lacey states that one elevation on the plan shows an aluminum fence at the top of Kline Rd. That does not
fit the character of the neighborhood. She hopes that someone would take a look at the aesthetics on the
architectural side of the project.
•Village resident Randall Nesbitt states that his main complaint he has tonight is the inability to get information
when asked. A perfect example is his request for a copy of the Fisher and Associates Historical Study. His
property was not included in this study and he would like to know why.
•R. Nesbitt states that he also supports the idea of a safe path for students to walk but is frustrated with the
processes. He had two trustees visit over the weekend at the site of this project and he raised the question again
of why and when the south side of the street was chosen.
20
•R. Nesbitt states that he has heard that costs were the main factor along with the need for a retaining wall.
•R. Nesbitt states that there are also drainage issues and how will that be corrected since everything that has
been done in the past hasn't worked.
R. Nesbitt further states he would like to know how the construction administration will work. He feels that
there needs to be an emphasis on keeping the character of the neighborhood since it is a historical area.
•Village resident Lisken Cordes states that she too supports this project and appreciated all the work the Village
staff has put into it.
•L. Cordes states that she is concerned about the safety of pedestrians because of truck traffic and distracted
driving.
•Village resident John Lewis attending via zoom states that there are three hundred feet of sidewalks that will
run along his property line.
•J. Lewis states that it is excessive to have four, five, or even seven-foot-wide sidewalks as proposed and would
like that idea reevaluated.
•J. Lewis states that it would make more sense to move the sidewalk closer to the curb which would preserve
more of the trees that add to the quality of the landscape in that area.
•J. Lewis states that he is also frustrated that two streetlights appeared on that same stretch of property without
any engagement by anyone at the Village. This leads to the question of who is going to be watching the
development of this project and makings sure things are done as discussed with the properties in question.
•E. Smith states that there were delays in information coming out on this project. There were long periods
where there wasn't any new information as the project cleared different hurdles required through this federal
design process.
•E. Smith states that the historical study that was mentioned in the study area was determined by NYS historic
preservation office, the Village and our firm had no control over which elements were studied. It has also been
confirmed that we are not allowed to share that information to protect the privacy of the property owners.
•E. Smith states that all sidewalks have to be ADA compliant and for some of the areas we know need to be
adjusted we will reissue a new set of plans once all the feedback has been completed.
•E. Smith states that the fence aesthetics can be open to change but it will need to be uniform throughout the
project.
•E. Smith states that there will be a full-time construction manager for this project.
•E. Smith states that we will have to take a few of the paper birch trees for this project but not all of them. It is
the goal of this project to save as many as possible.
•P. Wlodarczyk states that the ADA criteria to meet standards is a five-foot sidewalk. There are instances where
we can vary from that but we have to balance that out throughout the project.
21
•P. Wlodarczyk states that We are limited to how long the sidewalk can be four feet.
•P. Wlodarczyk states that the cross slope and pitch towards the road needed to be in balance to handle the
drainage. After looking at these possibilities the south side of the road was determined to provide a smoother
walking alignment.
•P. Wlodarczyk states that the current location of the sidewalks was to minimize the number of impacts to
drainage and align the paths of the crosswalks. There will be new drainage installed along the sidewalk going
down Kline Rd.
•Village resident D. Kuckes asks for clarification on why the width of the sidewalks varies for this project.
•E.Smith states that the guidelines come from ADA and the ADA states that when a five-foot-wide sidewalk is
not possible, then the width can be reduced. However, then you have to have a landing (which would be wider
than five feet) where people in a wheelchair can pass by.
•Village resident A. Mergold states that the slope of the sidewalks is not ADA-compliant.
•E, Smith states that it is compliant with ADA as long as it follows the same slope of the roadway.
•Village resident A. Mergold states he is also concerned about where the property lines are since nothing about
that shows up in these plans.
•Village resident R. Nesbitt would like to know who will be the construction manager for this project.
•E. Smith states that the approximate highway boundary is shown in the drawings labeled as (HB).
•M. McMurry states that the Village has not signed a construction contract therefore we have not selected a
construction manager.
•Trustee Robinson reminds the public that the Village sidewalk plow is a four-foot plow and if we reduce the
width of any sidewalks to three feet then we would be taking the chance of plowing the lawn.
•Village resident R. Nesbitt questions the depth of the sidewalk.
•P. Wlodarczyk states that all pedestrian areas will be four inches of concrete and six inches in depth for
driveways.
•B. Cross states that the Village sidewalk plow has been plowing sidewalks with no noticeable problems with
the equipment damaging the sidewalk.
•Village resident J. Lewis would like who will be responsible for protecting private property lines on this
project.
•B. Cross states that the Village is obligated by federal standards to hire a full-time onsite construction
inspection personnel contracted through Fisher and Associates or the contractor.
22
•Village resident J. Lewis states that he wants to make sure that no parking of equipment, stacking of material,
or anything will be placed on the homeowner's property.
•B. Cross states that more than likely a lot of the contractors’ materials and equipment will be stored at the
Village DPW on Sheldon Rd.
•B. Cross states that it is not our preference to hurry this project along. It is an NYSDOT twenty-four-month
contract that we signed which is dictated by the Federal Highway Administration. We have already exceeded
that period once and that extension is due to expire at the end of this construction season.
•B. Cross states that another reason why the south side of Kline was selected was the fact that the north side of
Overlook was just too steep and require a mid-block crosswalk to that side.
•In closing B. Cross states that the Highland Rd. culvert replacement was done by the Village DPW and was a
replacement in kind and not subject to any kind of federal aid design process. He feels it is unfair to criticize the
work they performed.
•Mayor Woodard states that at this point the Board will discuss the project, approve the drawings and allow
Fisher and Associates to produce bid documents and post them on the Village website.
•Mayor Woodard states that the Board will also be discussing how much money the Village is willing to
commit to this project. The federal government is giving us eighty percent of the original estimate and
obviously, the cost has gone up since receiving that award.
•Mayor Woodard thanks the members of the public for their participation and we will keep you informed as this
project moves forward.
•Trustee Robinson states that those who have expressed concerns to B. Cross and were not reflected in the
drawings to reach back out to him so he can pass them along to Fisher and Associates.
•Trustee Robinson states that there was a misunderstanding that tonight the Board had to establish the
maximum limit of the Villages contribution to this project. It is now clear that this has to be done before the
bids are opened.
•Trustee Robinson states the main reason to wait on establishing an amount of money is that it could affect the
competitive bidding.
•E. Smith states that the sooner we can get this out to bid the larger the number of potential bidders. Those
submitting bids are going to be familiar with the federal process and would likely have a good idea of your
budget.
•E. Smith states the timeline from this point is to have the Village sign the State and Local Agreement, to
NYSDOT then, State Comptroller will then have to sign it and fully execute it. At that time, we would be able
to advertise the project. Then the final set of plans and documents have to go back to NYSDOT for approval
before we can advertise the project to bid.
•Trustee Salton states asks what level of confidence we have that the Village will be able to bid on this project
in eight to ten weeks.
23
,
•E. Smith states that realistically bids will be opened in early May.
•Mayor Woodard states that the Board will make a monetary decision at the April Board meeting.
•Trustee Hubbell inquiries about the current construction estimate and if that has been updated.
•Trustee Marshall states that this is a new estimate which is much higher than the original.
•B. Cross points out that this project requires unit pricing and the significance of that is people in the road
construction business are tuned into the unit pricing of each individual and they know when a unit price is out of
range. Therefore, there should not be a huge variance in the bid numbers.
•Mayor Woodard states that our increased share for this project is $146,000. The project has been segmented
into five sections. This is important to keep in mind when bids are opened because our DPW department could
complete some of the segments.
Resolution: 9353
Resolution authorizing the implementation, and funding in the first instance 100% of the federal-aid
eligible costs, of a transportation federal-aid project, and appropriating funds therefore.
WHEREAS, a project for the Walking Safe: Cayuga Heights, P.I.N. 395069 (the "Project") is eligible for
funding under Title 23 U.S. Code, as amended, that calls for the apportionment of the costs of such program to
be borne at the ratio of 80% Federal funds and 20% non-federal funds; and
WHEREAS, as provided for by agreement with the NYS Department of Transportation, PE and/or ROW
Incidental or ROW acquisition work performed by the municipality for the federal aid-eligible construction
project covered by the agreement, the costs of such work that are approved in writing by NYSDOT as
applicable to the federal aid and Marchiselli aid construction work (excluding costs applicable to non-federally
eligible or non-Marchiselli eligible project elements) shall be credited following FHWA's construction phase
closeout audit of the Project to Project costs that are eligible for federal and Marchiselli aid; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Cayuga Heights desires to advance the Project by making a commitment of 100%
of the Non-Federal share of the costs of Engineering, ROW, and Construction.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Village Board of Trustees, duly convened does hereby,
RESOLVED, that the Village Board of Trustees hereby approves the above-subject project; and it is hereby
further
RESOLVED, that the Village Board of Trustees hereby authorizes the Village of Cayuga Heights to pay in the
first instance 100% of the federal and non-federal share of the cost of Engineering, ROW, and Construction
work for the Project or portions thereof; and
24
RESOLVED, that in the event the full federal and non-federal share costs of the project exceeds
the amount appropriated above, the Village of Cayuga Heights shall convene as soon as possible
to appropriate said excess amount immediately upon the notification by the Village Treasurer
therefore, and it is further
RESOLVED, that the Mayor of the Village of Cayuga Heights be and is hereby authorized to
execute all necessary Agreements, certifications or reimbursement request for Federal Aid and / or
Marchiselli Aid on behalf of the Village of Cayuga Heights with the New York State Department
of Transportation in connection with the advancement of approval of the Project and providing for
the administration of the Project and the municipality’s first instance funding of project costs and
permanent funding of the local share of federal-aid and state-aid eligible Project costs and all
Project costs within appropriations therefore that are not so eligible, and it is further
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be filed with the New York State
Commissioner of
Transportation by attaching it to any necessary Agreement in connection with the Project, and be it
furth
RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Motion: Trustee Hubbell
Second: Trustee Marshall
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton
Nays: none
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
9. Report of Police Chief Wright: Submitted Report (Exhibit 2023-136)
•Police Chief Wright states that the month of January was a very busy month for the department.
•Police Chief Wright states that he is glad to report that overtime hours for full-time and part-time
were low this month.
10. Report of Director of DPW Wiese: Submitted Report (Exhibit 2023-137)
•Director Wiese states that the DPW repaired a water main break on Texas Lane on February 4,
2023 The leak was found to be a valve that had a gasket and bolt failure. The valve was repaired,
and the line returned to operation the same day. As a result of this work two isolation valves were
found to be damaged while the work was occurring. These valves were repaired with the help of
the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday, February 7, 2023
25
•Director Wiese states that new tracking devices called iTrackers were reviewed and ordered for
our sewer system. These devices are portable flow trackers that can be used by the DPW to
monitor flow in individual manholes which will help identify I&I in the sewer lines.
•Trustee Robinson inquiries about the status of the empty house on North Triphammer Road that
had a water leak last week. Are there any health concerns the Village should be concerned about?
•Police Chief Wright states that they were able to make contact with the owners of the property and
they plan on fixing the water damage.
11. Report of Clerk Walker:
•Clerk Walker states that the only action item that he needs Board approval for is the Board of
Trustees Videoconferencing Procedures.
•Village Attorney R. Marcus states that the primary focus of this is the fact that members of the
Board are only excluded from physically attending a Board meeting if they have an emergency
situation. Cayuga Heights Fire Department could be a site as well.
•Village Attorney R. Marcus states that this update was prepared by the Committee on Open
Government and recommended by NYCOM.
Resolution: 9354
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees hereby adopts the
procedures for Board Member Videoconferencing pursuant to Public Officers Law § 103-a
The Board of Trustees
Procedures for Member Videoconferencing
Pursuant to Public Officers Law § 103-a
In compliance with Public Officers Law (POL) § 103-a(2)(a), the Board of
Trustees/Planning Board/Zoning Board of Appeals (the "Board"), following a public hearing,
authorized by resolution on February 15, 2023, the use of videoconferencing as described in POL §
103-a.
The following procedures are hereby established to satisfy the requirement of POL § 103-
a(2)(b) that any public body which in its discretion wishes to permit its members to participate in
meetings by videoconferencing from private locations – under extraordinary circumstances – must
establish written procedures governing member and public attendance.
26
1. Board members shall be physically present at any meeting of the Board unless such member is
unable to be physically present at one of the designated public meeting locations due to
extraordinary circumstances.
2. For purposes of these procedures, the term “extraordinary circumstances” includes disability,
illness, caregiving responsibilities, or any other significant or unexpected factor or event which
precludes the member’s physical attendance at such meeting.
3. If a member is unable to be physically present at one of the designated public meeting locations
and wishes to participate by videoconferencing from a private location due to extraordinary
circumstances, the member must notify the Mayor/Chairperson of the Planning Board/Chairperson
of the Zoning Board of Appeals no later than four business days prior to the scheduled meeting in
order for proper notice to the public to be given.
4. If there is a quorum of members participating at a physical location(s) open to the public, the
Board may properly convene a meeting. A member who is participating from a remote location that
is not open to in-person physical attendance by the public shall not count toward a quorum of the
Board but may participate and vote if there is a quorum of members at a physical location(s) open
to the public.
5. Except in the case of executive sessions conducted pursuant to POL § 105, the Board shall
ensure that its members can be heard, seen, and identified while the meeting is being conducted,
including but not limited to any motions, proposals, resolutions, and any other matter formally
discussed or voted upon. This requirement shall include the use of first and last name placards
physically placed in front of the members or, for members participating by videoconferencing from
private locations due to extraordinary circumstances, such members must ensure that their full first
and last name appears on their videoconferencing screen.
6. The minutes of the meetings involving videoconferencing based on extraordinary
circumstances pursuant to POL § 103-a shall include which, if any, members participated by
videoconferencing from a private location due to such extraordinary circumstances.
7. The public notice for the meeting shall inform the public: (i) that extraordinary circumstances
videoconferencing will (or may) be used, (ii) where the public can view and/or participate in such
meeting, (iii) where required documents and records will be posted or available, and (iv) the
physical location(s) for the meeting where the public can attend.
27
8. The Board shall provide that each open portion of any meeting conducted using extraordinary
circumstances videoconferencing shall be recorded and such recordings posted or linked on the
Board’s website (https://cayuga-heights.ny.us) within five business days following the meeting and
shall remain so available for a minimum of five years thereafter. Such recordings shall be
transcribed upon request.
9. If members of the Board are authorized to participate by videoconferencing from a private
location due to extraordinary circumstances, the Board shall provide the opportunity for members
of the public to view such meeting by video, and to participate in proceedings by videoconference
in real time where public comment or participation is authorized. The Board shall ensure that
where extraordinary circumstances videoconferencing is used, it authorizes the same public
participation or testimony as in person participation or testimony.
10. Open meetings of the Board conducted using extraordinary circumstances videoconferencing
pursuant to the provisions of POL § 103-a shall be broadcast pursuant to the requirements of POL §
103(f) and shall utilize technology to permit access by members of the public with disabilities
consistent with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as amended, and corresponding
guidelines. For the purposes of this guideline, “disability” shall have the meaning defined in
Executive Law § 292. 11. The in-person participation requirements of POL § 103-a(2)(c) shall not
apply during a state disaster emergency declared by the governor pursuant to Executive Law § 28 if
the Board determines that the circumstances necessitating the emergency declaration would affect
or impair the ability of the Board to hold an in-person meeting
12. These procedures shall be conspicuously posted on the Board’s website (https://cayuga-
heights.ny.us).
Motion: Trustee Marshall
Second: Trustee Biloski
Ayes: Mayor Woodard; Trustees: Biloski, Hubbell, Marshall, Rennekamp, Robinson, and Salton
Nays: none
Abstentions: none
Motion Carried
12. Report of Attorney Marcus: No Report at this time.
13. Adjournment: Mayor Woodard adjourns the meeting at 9:58 p.m.
28
EXHIBIT 2023-140
March 14, 2023
Honorable Linda Woodard
Board of Trustees
Village of Cayuga Heights
Monthly Report February 2023
For a short month we ran a lot of calls. We had 28 calls in the Village of Cayuga Heights, 10 calls
in the Town of Ithaca and 5 mutual aid requests. There were 18 EMS calls and 25 fire responses.
We usually do not have many motor vehicle crashes (MVC) but in February we had 3. One of the
MVCs was on Pleasant Grove Road on a cold and snowy day. A student stepped off the curb to
cross the road and an oncoming car tried to stop but the road conditions caused her to start sliding
and she struck the pedestrian. The patient was transported by Bangs Ambulance to Upstate
Medical Center in Syracuse and was released with minor injuries. We did respond to many mutual
aid calls through the month. All but one was to the Lansing Fire Department. Unusually we did
have 2 cardiac arrest calls in the district in February. Being the only Advance Life Support rescue
agency in the county is very helpful on these calls. By the time the ambulance arrived our rescue
members had advanced life support measures established and first doses of medications
administered prior to ambulance arrival. We often talk about the work it takes to maintain the ALS
status and equipment on the rescue but then we have calls like these and we are proud that we are
able to provide this service to our community.
We filled February with solid training opportunities. We finished up with the fall recruits and their
probationary checklists. We started the class with 16 and finished with 9. Two of the original 16
went out with non-fire department related injuries. All 9 of those who finished are taking BEFO
and many are enrolled in NYS EMT. We are pleased with their progress and motivation. The
trainings for February included Fire Alarm Systems, Interior Search, hose lines at the training
tower and exterior operations and ladders. In line with the two previously mentioned cardiac arrest
calls we did an EMS training on advanced airway management for the non-breathing patient.
Trainings are very well attended.
We got the bids back for the roof project and are hoping to award the bid at the March Board of
Trustees Meeting. There has been no movement at this time on the HVAC project at the station but
we have been in contact with HSC and they are still planning to start running the line sets this
winter. We did have three circulating pumps go bad on the furnace this month. This was
unexpected to have three go bad at one time. We generally replace circulating pumps one a time as
they go bad every several years. Luckily we caught these before total failure, which has happened
in the past causing a large watery mess in the furnace room. We have had no word on the F150
29
pickup truck that we are replacing. We were asked to check back in mid-March to see if the dealer
has any updated information.
The budget for the department has been developed and submitted. We are looking forward to some
equipment purchases. We are planning to replace our rescue saws on the heavy trucks. The
current saws are made by a company that went out of business several years ago. We are going to
replace them with Stihl Rescue Saws with the faith that Stihl will not go out of business any time
soon. We are planning to replace the beds in the bunker rooms. The beds are provided to the
bunkers and many of them are old and in need of replacement. We are also in the third year of our
radio replacement project. There are many departments in the county that have not been replacing
radios in smaller batches and are now in dire straits because of the cost to replace all of them at
once.
We are looking forward to our first banquet in several years in April. The nominations for officers
were done and we have an uncontested slate for elections. Lt. Sophie Janowsky is moving up to an
Assistant Chiefs position this year. Sophie will be the first female chief officer in the department’s
history. She has been a member since she was 16 years old. We are excited for this year’s group
of officers.
All is well at the station.
Sincerely,
George Tamborelle
Fire Chief/Fire Superintendent
CHFD Roof Bids: We will need two Resolutions, One Accepting the bids and Two, awarding
the bid and authorizing Mayor Woodard to sign the contract once approved by Village
Attorney R. Marcus.
Quick Construction: $125,000 Ice/Water $3500
Hale Contracting Inc. $323,500 Ice/Water $3500
Dave Marion Carpentry Inc. $412,500 Ice/Water $9000
30
EXHIBIT 2023-141
VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS
TREASURER’S REPORT
Revenues and Expenses:
The February 2023 bank to book reconciliations are complete. They have been reviewed and
approved by Trustee and Deputy Treasurer Rennekamp. A copy of the accounting system
generated Monthly Treasurer’s Report is attached.
Budget:
The 2023-2024 Budget Worksheets for all funds have been shared with the Trustees. Please review
these before our upcoming budget workshop. The budget workshop will be on Saturday, March 25th
from 9-12 pm.
Approval of Abstract 10:
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Village of Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees authorizes and
approves Abstract #10 for FYE2023 consisting of:
• TA vouchers 75-82 in the amount of $13,923.28 and
• Consolidated Fund vouchers 691-771 in the amount of $663,237.53
and the Treasurer is instructed to make payments thereon.
Respectfully Submitted
Laura W. Dolch
Laura W. Dolch
#1 Treasurer
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
EXHIBIT 2023-143
Beatrice Szekely, Village of Cayuga Heights Historian, March 2023
BSzekely@cayuga-heights.ny.us
Writing and Publication
University Suburb, the Founding of Cayuga Heights in Ithaca, New York, the book manuscript I
have been working on for several years, is complete save for endnotes and illustrations.
“Sunset Park and the Western Slope: Looking Backward and Forward” Village Voices (annual
village newsletter mailed to residents).
Interaction with the Village Government
April 20: I spoke at Board of Trustees meeting about the land use and zoning history of the
nineteenth century schoolhouse at Community Corners that is currently a dental office and may be
affected by development of adjoining land owned by RaNic Golf Club (formerly the Ithaca
Country Club).
May 30: Copied on email by village trustee Richard Robinson, I corresponded with Benjamin
Darfler, trustee of the Village of Trumansburg, about election of mayors and trustees in Cayuga
Heights without affiliation to a national political party. Explaining that candidates run as part of a
local party, I noted comment in the Ithaca Journal after our first election, in 1915, that "there were
no tickets in the field" as it has remained ever since. I went on to make a few more points: In my
opinion, non-affiliation allows the board to concentrate on stewardship of the village within the
Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County and New York State. Nobody seeks election because they think
it will be advantageous for a political career, or to act in concert with anyone holding office in
surrounding municipalities. Though there is modest remuneration, the considerable amount of
service required is really repaid by getting to know our less than two square miles well. (The first
thing I learned after joining the board as a long-time resident was how very little I knew about it.)
June 6, met with local landscape architect at Sunset Park to share its history relevant to planning
for its improvement, and in the fall was asked by the mayor to join a task force on the renewal of
Sunset Park chaired by Trustee James Marshall.
Keeping in Touch with Village and Nearby Residents in Another Year of COVID Precautions
Researched the histories of properties at 627 and 634 Highland Road for new owners.
Answered a query in November from Cornell Heights historian Lynn Thommen about the naming
of Wait Avenue, Roberts Place and Thurston Avenue.
Engaged in more conversations with friends and neighbors about the history of their village streets
and locations.
Of special interest, Tasha Kates, new owner of 107 Overlook Road, is researching the career of its
architect, Helen Binkerd Young, for a book.
43
Collaboration with the Other Municipal Historians in Tompkins County
Ongoing attendance at monthly meetings chaired by Tompkins County Historian Carol Kammen
who has recently announced that is retiring after twenty-two years. At the request of County
Administrator Lisa Holmes, I have agreed to be on the search committee for someone to succeed
her.
August: As requested by Sue Thompson, Town of Enfield Historian, I prepared a chronological
history of the two public schools opened in Cayuga Heights, one in 1823 and one in 1923, for a
county-wide project she is coordinating. For the village newsletter this fall, I would like to write a
short article about the bicentennial and centennial of these events. To information about Cayuga
Heights School on the History Project website I would add the story of how the land to build it was
bought from developer Jared Newman and how its opening contributed to founding the village.
Public Events
August 27: For a Walk and Talk sponsored by Historic Ithaca, after an introduction by Mayor
Woodard, I updated a presentation given on Sunset Park in 2017 with more information about its
landscape architecture and forthcoming revitalization. Former deputy village historian Patricia
Longoria then led a tour of the surrounding neighborhood with focus on houses of historic interest
designed by local architects LeRoy Burnham and Helen Binkerd Young who is mentioned above.
Among the over thirty people attending were several new owners of old houses.
October 15, 2022, I gave a brief welcome to 20 persons live and nine zooming for program
“Literary Women in Silent Film,” at 2:00 pm in Marcham Hall, part of a weekend of events during
Silent Movie Month presented by the Wharton Studio Museum and Historic Ithaca. Introduced by
former village trustee Diana Riesman, co-founder of the Wharton Studio project, two of three talks
on the program were about women novelists in Ithaca whose work was adapted for silent film.
Journalist Maude Radford Warren and author Ruth Sawyer Durand, who lived in the village on
Highland Road, were featured in the talk given by Pat Longoria, former deputy village historian,
now webmaster of the Finger Lakes Film Project. Village clerk Jeff Walker did a superb job
providing the tech support that made the afternoon possible. Marcham Hall proved a perfect venue
on a lovely fall day. In my welcoming remarks I explained that we were meeting in the art studio of
Dorothy Cornell who built the house and that her residence overlapped with those of Warren and
Durand in Cayuga Heights. I was asked the following week if more community events might be
held there.
Money spent:
Newspapers.com subscription, $59.90 in January and July
Ancestry US Discovery Annual Membership, $247.32
Association of Public Historians of New York, annual membership $40
And of note: The Cayuga Heights History Project has been made a more integral part of the village
website. Conversation with Carole Schiffman who built it originally (using Weebly that is now part
of Square), and Deputy Clerk Kiersten Perkins is ongoing.
44
EXHIBIT 123- 144
45
46
FOR THE VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS, N.Y.
Signed on this ___________day of March 2023
Linda Woodard, Mayor
FOR THE TOWN OF ITHACA, N.Y
Signed on this ___________day of March 2023
Rob Howe, Supervisor
47
EXHIBIT 2023-145
Superintendent of Public Works B. Cross Report:
During the construction progress meeting yesterday, we discussed details about some electrical issues that
have been discovered through the construction process. There are 3 items that have been clarified and
subsequently priced out by Matco:
-add a new light switch (and associated circuitry) in the lab as requested by the Village ($1,300)
-replace two existing motor starters on the existing sludge scraper drives, including upgrade of circuit
wires. This is needed because although the current circuitry is 480v wiring, the existing motor starters
were previously converted from original 240v configuration to allow them to be run as 480v power input.
Although this has been working (for a long time), this conversion is not code compliant and is required to
be updated to meet the current code ($22,000)
-while working on connecting some of the new equipment to the wiring from the main power feed, it was
discovered that the 50 year old wiring had no dedicated ground conductor. The original wiring was
installed in a metal conduit which could serve as a dedicated ground (allowed by previous codes), but
when the new diesel generator was installed in 1999, the supply-side cable was extended using newer PVC
conduit which does not complete the dedicated grounding. Since there are multiple splices, none of the
existing conductors can be utilized. Therefore new 3/0 conductors need to be installed in an underground
duct bank ($62,944)
The combined total for Change Order E-002 come to $86,244.
The budgeting of the project included a 5% contingency that started out at the beginning of the combined
phase 1 & 2 at $469,280.
Previous combined change orders have reduced the available contingency to $306,709.
Therefore, the new contingency allowance would be reduced to $229,465.
There are a few other changes that are anticipated including specifically a “remobilization” reimbursement
to Blue Heron for a “shut-down” caused by the 9 month delayed delivery of the main electrical control
panels as part of Matco’s contract. Blue Heron has agreed to charge us only for their actual cost to
demobilize and remobilize and not for the value of lost time.
We are also anticipating a significant credit from Blue Heron because we have negotiated a deal to dispose
of the sludge “on-hand” at Steuben County Landfill at $40/ton instead of the $77/ton that they thought it
was going to cost at Seneca Meadows Landfill.
Overall, I think we are still in good position to finish the job within the original 5% contingency budget.
Sincerely,
Brent
48
EXHIBIT 2023-146
49
50
51
EXHIBIT 2023-147
Village of Cayuga Heights
Police Department
___________________________________________________
Jerry L. Wright
Chief of Police
To: The Honorable Mayor Woodard
Members of the Board of Trustees
Village of Cayuga Heights
Re: Report of the Police Department for February 2023
In the month of February, the police department received 364 calls for service. In addition to these calls, 91
uniform traffic tickets were issued, and 0 parking violations were cited. A breakdown of the calls for
service is as follows:
One Felony arrest was made for Criminal Possession of Stolen Property after completion of a Stolen
Vehicle investigation.
4 Misdemeanor Penal Law Complaints were handled. In one complaint officers responded to a report of
Trespass at a local business. After investigation of the complaint a subject was arrested on Misdemeanor
charges of Criminal Trespass 3rd and Criminal Mischief-Reckless Property Damage. Another complaint of
Criminal Mischief was reported by an individual stating their vehicle had been damaged. There was a
suspect named in this case however the complainant declined prosecution and the case has been closed. A
Fraudulent phone call complaint was received by an elderly resident stating that an individual called her
stating that her granddaughter was in need of medical attention and needed money sent. The complainant
realized that this was a scam. No money was exchanged, and no further information was given. A theft
from a vehicle report was made after a resident stated that their house key and vehicle key had been taken
out of their unsecured vehicle. There are no suspects in this case.
The investigation of 10 Traffic Stops led to 11 Vehicle and Traffic Misdemeanor charges. 9 for Suspended
Registration and 1 for each Aggravated Unlicensed Operation of a Motor Vehicle 3rd and 2nd.
One Penal Law Violation for Trespass was handled which was described above.
There were no Local Law complaints received.
9 Motor Vehicle accidents were reported all occurring at different locations within the village. 1 at Hanshaw
Rd. and Hampton Rd., 1 on Wyckoff Rd., 1 on E. Upland Rd. at Hanshaw Rd., 1 on Triphammer Rd., 2 in
52
the parking lot at 903 Hanshaw Rd., 1 in the Dick’s parking lot assisting the Sheriff’s Office, and 2 on State
Route 13, 1 of which involved a deer.
No other incidents involving deer were reported.
6 calls for service were completed under the Tompkins County Mutual Aid Agreement involving CHPD
officers assisting other agencies and 1 call involving agencies assisting CHPD.
Over the course of the month, Officers took part in the following training and/or events: On the 14th Officers
Langlois and Barr conducted a PTS Grant Traffic Safety Detail. On the 15th Officer Langlois attended CNT
Training.
The full-time officers worked a total of 31.5 hours of overtime and the part-time officers worked a total of
174 hours.
Sincerely,
Chief Jerry Wright
53
EXHIBIT 2023-148
Village of Cayuga Heights
Mike Wiese – B.O.T Report
March 15h, 2023
Code Enforcement –
A training in Sidney was attended. 5 hours towards my annual 24-hour requirement was
received.
Street –
The DPW reviewed all manholes in the Cambridge, Randolph, Warwick, and Burleigh
drive locations to ensure the tops were sealed appropriately and to prepare for paving work
coming this summer.
Water –
Two additional valves were replaced in association with the Texas lane water break that
occurred in early February. Both valves failed while attempting to control the flow of water
during the original repair and as a result both were replaced.
Sewer –
New tracking devices have been installed in 5 various manholes in the village. These
devices will be read every week via Bluetooth so the information can be analyzed.
PROPOSAL
For: Village of Cayuga Heights
Attn: Michael Weise
54
Date: 3/9/2023
Project: Repair leaking Sanitary Sewer
Work Type: CIPP ( Cured in Place Pipe Lining ) Point Repair
QUOTE -Upon acceptance, we propose to furnish the following:
Supply and Install (1) 12” Repair sleeve Lump Sum $4,000.
Inclusions:
• Mobilization / Demobilization
• Video inspection before and after pipe installation
• By pass pumping during repair (limited to 3” pump)
Exclusions:
• Permits & Bonds
• Traffic Control beyond cones
SPECIAL NOTES:
* Price is based on completion of work during the 2023 construction season.
* Pricing is based on our standard insurance.
* Quotation is good for 45 days
Thank you for the opportunity to quote this project.
Sincerely,
Daniel T. Graham
President Accepted by:
___________________________________________
Print name:
____________________________________________
Title:
_________________________________________________
Date:
_________________________________________________
55
EXHIBIT 2023-149
Clerks Report:
TOWNS AND VILLAGES PARKS AND TRAILS GRANT
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT
WHEREAS, the Village of Cayuga Heights owns the property knowns as Sunset Park, which is a
municipal park wholly located within the Village; and
WHEREAS, the Village desires to improve the infrastructure of Sunset Park by repairing and
repointing the existing stone structures within the park; and
WHEREAS, the cost of such repair is estimated to be $5,000; and
WHEREAS, the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability is making funding
available to the improvement of municipal parks and trails through the Towns and Villages Parks
and Trails Grant Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees supports
and authorizes the submission of a grant application for up to $5,000 to the Tompkins County
Towns and Villages Parks and Trails Grant Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if the grant application is successful, the Cayuga Heights
Board of Trustees authorizes the Village Mayor to execute the contract with Tompkins County to
implement the project.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the official seal of the Village of
Cayuga Heights of Tompkins County, New York, this __ day of ___________, 2023.
Jeffrey D. Walker
Village Clerk