Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpec Mtg. Minutes 9/27/1993VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS 17 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Minutes of a Special Meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Cayuga Heights held September 27, 1993 at 3:40 PM in the Village Hall. PRESENT: Mayor Anderson; Trustees Collyer, Kira, Perry, Pimentel; Attorney Geldenhuys; Supt. of P.W. Rogers; Fire Supt. Leonhardt. ABSENT: Trustees Fleming, Janis. OTHERS PRESENT: Paul Lewis, Att. James Miller, Att. Elana Flash, Jay Woolford, Tom Niederkorn, Barbara Blanchard, Jeff Stimsoft, Ithaca Journal Rep. Mayor Anderson called the meeting to order at 3:50 PM stating that the primary matter to consider was any additional comments or clarifications of the Draft Resolution distributed by Attorney Geldenhuys at the September 20th meeting which grants approval of the preliminary PUD application submitted by Kendal. There was discussion concerning sewer and water connection fees and it was agreed that the Attorney will add a Section "D" in the Draft Resolution to address the issue of payment of all fees in connection with the project. Attorney Miller asked that the following be added to-Section "C" in the Draft Resolution: ... "in their letter dated August 18, 1993." Motion by Trustee Kira,.seconded by Trustee Perry: RESOLUTION 4514 — GRANT APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTED BY KENDAL AT ITHACA, INC. FOR THE SAVAGE FARM SITE WIiEREAS, Kendal at Ithaca, Inc. made an application for preliminary approval of a Planned Unit Development pursuant to the Planned Unit Development ordinance (hereinafter referred to as "the ordinance") of the Village of Cayuga Heights for property located on North Triphammer Road and known as the Savage Farm, in the Village of Cayuga Heights, County'of Tompkins and State of New York; and WHEREAS, draft and final Environmental Impact Statements have been prepared, and the Board of Trustees, as 1'ead agency, has complied with all requirements of part 617 of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations pertaining to Environmental Impact review; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Cayuga Heights makes the following findings with regard to the application for preliminary approval of a Planned Unit Development: I. The following requirements set forth in paragraph B of the Planned Unit Development ordinance have been met to the satisfaction of the Board of Trustees: 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. S. 9. 10. Minimum acreage Permitted land uses Density Size of lots Height of buildings Natural features Storm water runoff Site planning requirements 18 Minutes of special Meeting - 9/?l/93 II. Pursuant to section B(11) of the ordinance, the Board finds that special and unusual circumstances exist, which justify modification of the following requirements: III A. Section B(5) requires a 75 -foot yard setback from any existing street right -of way line. The Board finds that it will be in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare to permit a bus shelter within the 75 -foot yard setback on North Triphammer Road. This will. facilitate easy access for public transportation vehicles, and enhance the safety of residents and users of North Triphammer Road. B. Section B(7) requires that the total land coverage for all buildings in the Planned Unit Development should not exceed the coverage requirement of the underlying district. The underlying residence district specifies maximum coverage of 12 %: `;.'he building coverage of the proposed project is 12.44% of the total lot area. The Board finds that it will not have a negative impact on the health, safety and welfare of the ,:ommunity to permit this additional .44% of coverage. The building coverage percentage includes covered walkways of 97,800 square feet. This more than accounts for the additional .44 %. Moreover, the excess coverage is a small percentage, and will not undermine the overall intent of the Planned Unit Development. The Board in its decision considered'the following factors: A. Impact on existing and planned capacity of infrastructure dystems, including but not limited to roads, water,, sewer, energy and drainage. The application is satisfactory in limiting negative impacts in these respects. B. Whether the proposed development promotes the orderly growth and sound development of the .community, and whether a need exists for the proposed development. The Board finds that a need for a continuing care facility exists in the community, and that its development is beneficial-to the orderly growth and sound development of the community. C. The extent to which the plan departs from the zoning regulations applicable to the property in terms of bulk, density, and permitted uses. Variation is as follows: I. Permitted uses in the residence district include residences for one or two' families with up to four unrelated occupants, public and municipal buildings, golf courses, private swimming pools, cemeteries, in -house professional offices, day care and customary home occupations. Kendal Community will be a mixed -use development, including clustered one - family residences and apartments, personal and skilled health care, and 1 Minutes of Special Meeting - 9/27193 19 3 related community and administrative services. Limited in -house commercial activity will provide basic services ® and amenities to residents of the facility. 2. Building height in a residence district is 25 feet, and in a PUD 30 feet. The highest structure in this development will be 30 feet. 3. Building coverage regulations limit coverage to 12% of the lot area. The proposed project will exceed this by .44 %. As set forth in paragraph II.B., the Board deems this variation acceptable. 4. in the residence district, there is a front yard minimum of 25 feet and a side and rear yard minimum of 15 feet. PUD regulations require a setback of 75 feet'from the right -of way and 100 feet from other property lines. The proposed development complies with these restrictions, with the exception of the bus shelter,'which the Board deems appropriate as set forth in paragraph II.A. above. The variation from the underlying district is in accordance with the ordinance, and therefore meets the goals of Planned. Unit Development in the Village of Cayuga Heights. D. The existing character of the neighborhood and the relationship, beneficial or adverse, of the proposed development to this neighborhood. The character of the neighborhood is residential, and is in close proximity to two commercial areas: the Community Corners shopping center in the Village of Cayuga Heights, and several shopping malls located in the Village of Lansing. The Board finds that the proposed development will have a beneficial relationship to this neighborhood, in that it will be largely residential, and that commercial uses will be related to the facility and limited to residents of the facility. B. Provision for pedestrian circulation and open space in the development. The proposed development makes ample provision for both these items. The development is clustered, leaving significant open space around it. Pedestrian circulation is facilitated by a system of covered walkways. F. Traffic circulation features within the site, including the amount of, location of, and access to automobile parking. Proposed traffic circulation features are acceptable. Access to automobile parking is adequate. G. The amount of traffic generated and the provisions for adequately handling or mitigating such volumes, and the nature and suitability of the connecting street or highway system to absorb the anticipated changes. 20 Minutes of Special Meeting - 9,'27/93 + The Board finds that the proposed development deals with the impact on traffic in the most acceptable way, in terms of location of entrance and exitways, and the addition of turning lanes. The Board of Trustees commissioned an independent traffic study, which was considered in its review of this application and the Environmental Impact Statement. H. The provisions for storm water runoff, sanitary and solid waste disposal, and other utilities on and adjacent to the site. Storm water runoff will be adequately handled by a drainage system proposed by the applicant. Solid waste disposal will be handled by the applicant. The sewer connections and other utilities will be installed at the cost of the applicant. I. Provision for access for emergency services. The Board finds that sufficient additional access is provided by the applicant. J. Any other factor reasonably related to the general health, welfare and safety of the community. The Board of Trustees considered the comments received from the Tompkins County Planning Department and the New York State Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the application of Kendal at Ithaca, Inc. for preliminary approval of a Planned Unit Development on the Savage rarm property, North Triphammer Road, Village of Cayuga Heights, County of Tompkins and State of New York is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: A. Review and inspection fee: The applicant shall submit the amount stated below, or a letter of credit therefor, to the Village Clerk, pursuant and subject to the provisions of section-III(B) of the Planned Unit Development ordinance of the Village of Cayuga Heights: 1. Review and inspection fees, including code enforcement: $35,000.00 2. Legal fees: $12,000.00 3. Traffic expert: $500.00 B. Within 30 days of taking legal title to the real property where the proposed development will be constructed, the applicant shall execute an easement, attached hereto as Schedule A, and an agreement pertaining to the possible future widening of North Triphammer Road, attached hereto as Schedule B. C. The applicant shall pay real estate taxes to the Village of Cayuga Heights based on the assessed value of the project as determined by the Tonpkins County Board of Equalization and Assessment, and further based on undertLtkings given to the Village of Cayuga Heights by the applicant in their letter dated August 18, 1993, attached hereto as Schedule C. D. Payment- of all fees for building permits, sewer connections and other customary fees for the development of the project. Trustees Collyer, Kira, Perry, Pimentel voted YES. U. I I 1 Minutes of Special Meeting - 9/27/93 5 21 It was mentioned that the next order of business calls for Engineer Rogers to provide a legal description of the Zoning Map showing that the Kendal project is within the PUD district. Trustee Pimentel moved and Trustee Collyer seconded adjournment. Meeting adjourned at 4:25 PM ( -a__ q�J� Anne Krohto Clerk