HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter- Re VCH Board Proposal for a 6 monthe fencing moratorium.PDFRe: VCH Board ProPosal for a
As usual, I am sPeaking uP for
to accommodate both fences a
fencing ordinance.
There are at least 2 kinds of fe
as small children or dogs; and
deer, with their ticks, damage,
would like the same Privilege
easily fit within the current o
Those of us who also want to
LONG time before the Village
waiting, we are being taxed o
Plan will cost - and this, duri
costs of fencing are borne bY
taxpayer.
NOTE also that other stres
adding on. NOTE that the To
a property, large or small. I
somehow "different," I Point
the Village stops and the To
they bypass Town lots and m
and procreate,
The appearance of our Villag
myself, which is why our Pro
to be open as well as strong.
residents the full use of their
in the front where passersbY
to the Village, not detracts.
Please consider our ProPosal
February 16,2010
Elizabeth Mount
303 E Upland Rd
Ithaca, NY 1-4850
month fencing moratorium
illagers whose properties are too small
d setbacks within the current, outdated
ces - those for keeping things in - such
ose for |<eeping things out - such as
and scat. Those of us with small lots
as those with large lots where fences
lnance.
clude deer should note that it will be a
lan bears'results (and while we are
the nearly one million dollars that the
a recession?). In contrast, NOTE that the
e property owner, not the Village
municipalities are cutting back, not
n of Ithaaa allows B' fences anywhere on
or those cif you who saY the Town is
ut that most of us don't even know where
begins although the deer certainly do, as
ve right into the Village to chow down
means a lot to both SallY Grubb and
ordinance carefully requires fences
By eliminating setbacks, it allows
ropertieg, and allows me to have a garden
t it to be. Namely, where it contributes
ow instead of in 6.me,n*h* 3e nfr-&
a,r*t-*vrt i;$&h& vY -
\l