Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-11-26-FINAL-minutes-with SEQRTOWN BOARD MEETING Town of Ulysses November 26, 2019 Audio of the minutes are available on the website at ulysses.ny.us. The meeting was held at the Ulysses Town Hall at 10 Elm Street, Trumansburg. Notice of Town Board meetings are posted on the Town's website and Clerk's board. ATTENDANCE: TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Supervisor- Liz Thomas Board members- Nancy Zahler, Richard Goldman, Michael Boggs Town Clerk- Carissa Parlato Project Assistant- Michelle Wright Attorney for the Town- Khandi Sokoni Environmental Planner- John Zepko OTHERS PRESENT: Roxanne Marino, Peter Houghton, Tim Fallon, Karen Meador ABSENT: Board member- John Hertzler CALL TO ORDER: Ms. Thomas called the meeting to order at 7pm. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA RESOLUTION 2019-199: APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED that the Ulysses Town Board approve the agenda for November 26, 2019 with the addition of an Executive Session at the beginning of the meeting for the advice of counsel; an Executive Session at the end of the meeting for the promotion of a particular person; and deletion of item #6c (will move to the 12/10 meeting agenda). Moved: Ms. Thomas Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 Seconded: Mr. Boggs EXECUTIVE SESSION: Ms. Thomas moved to go into Executive Session at 7:02pm for the purpose of advice of counsel. This was seconded by Ms. Zahler and passed unanimously. The board returned from Executive Session at 7:42pm. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR: Mr. Houghton expressed his concern to the proposed zoning law regarding the 2000 sq ft restriction on buildings on the Lakeshore district. He feels that the additions came without any public awareness. He just learned that the Planning Board recommended this but with a 6000 sq. ft. limit. The planning officer debunked the environmental concern. Others think it just a good idea but this isn't valid. This is an irrational abridgement of resident's rights. The board must demonstrate a sound basis that this is for the greater good of whole town. It is arbitrary & capricious. Ms. Meador of Taughannock Blvd. agrees with Mr. Houghton. She appreciates the board's work, but it is arbitrary. A small home built without environmental foresight could be more damaging than a larger home. Her current home has plantings, a green roof, sewage far from water, runoff redirected. She urges the board to remove the restriction and believes that it is in the interest of all for promoting the tax base. If kept in, it will discourage small businesses. Mr. Fallon stated that the Lakeshore & Conservation code was extensively debated in 2013 and ended with a 5% lot coverage area. He resents this last minute addition of 2000 sq. ft. It began with 6000 sq. ft. in April 2019. The 5% is sufficient. This addition of 2000 is not listed in the summaries on website, or in paragraph N of section 212-47 or I of the Conservation District section. Fairness and consideration of the board is appreciated in decision making. Ms. Marino thinks the board should reword the local law resolution to reflect that they chose not to apply the philosophies of the guiding documents. The current document does not follow the recommendations of the Zoning Update Steering Committee (ZUSC) so that isn't correct in the resolution. The board chose not to look at many of the comments regarding ag rural and not reducing the development. The future land use map was changed but doesn't seem in line the with comp plan. She appreciates the board's efforts. GENERAL REPORTS: Ms. Zahler shared that applications are being accepted for Recreation Director position. Ms. Thomas shared that various water quality committees are working on a water quality planner for the county to help work on water issues. She had a productive meeting with Bolton Point to discuss watershed rules and regulations. The group is connecting with Cayuga County who has created a management plan for Owasco Lake. OLD BUSINESS: PROPOSED ZONING LOCAL LAW Ms. Thomas stated that the board spent time last night going through comments on the proposed law that were received from NYS Ag & Markets and the Tompkins County 239 review. She asked the board whether they wanted to discuss additional comments received from the public hearing. Mr. Chang's comment regarding reducing primary buildings to one is not accurate as 3 allowed. The board declined discussing this further. With regard to Mr. Wertis' comments on wetlands and buffers, Ms. Thomas agrees that the sections could be updated but would take careful consideration and time. Ms. Zahler suggested that the town ask the county planning department if they could adapt the map to include all the resources/creeks, etc... Ms. Thomas reiterated that TC Planning has offered to help and this would be a great task. Regarding comment from Ms. Thompson, Ms. Thomas stated that the group had tried to clarify corner lots but it may not have been clear enough. Ms. Thompson's other comments relate to spelling and can be amended without being substantive. Ms. Sokoni advised caution on this by noting that even adding simple words like "and" can be a big change. With regard to Ms. Thompson's comment on septic systems, Ms. Thomas noted that it has already been discussed. Ms. Zahler agreed with Ms. Thompson's concern regarding subdividing and whether the 1 acre lot size is sufficient for septic and wells. Ms. Zahler thanked Ms. Marino and the Conservation and Sustainability Advisory Committee for generating the comments and research on CAFO/manure management standards. Ms.Thomas concurs with Ms. Marino on the lack of land preservation in this document and also appreciates the work of CSAC on CAFO language and solar glare. She hopes that in the future the board will work more on land preservation. Ms. Thomas asked the board whether they wanted to take action on the zoning law this evening. All agreed that they did not want to. She asked whether they wanted to take action on the SEQR. The board discussed this. Mr. Zepko described parts 1, 2, and 3 of the SEAR. Since the SEAR is in reference to a law only and not an action, there are no actual physical impacts. Ms. Sokoni explained that if the board makes any substantive changes to the proposed law, they will need to do the SEQR again. MOTION TO PROCEED WITH SEQR: Mr. Boggs made a motion to proceed with the SEQR. This was seconded by Ms. Thomas and passed unanimously. SEQR DECLARATION RESOLUTION 2019-200: SEQRA NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE ADOPTION OF LOCAL LAW # OF 20-- , A LOCAL LAW REPEALING IN ITS ENTIRETY THE TOWN OF ULYSSES ZONING LAW AS ADOPTED BY LOCAL LAW NUMBER 3 OF 2013 AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, AND CODIFIED AS CHAPTER 212 OF THE LAWS OF THE TOWN OF ULYSSES AND ITS PLACE ADOPTING A NEW ZONING LAW WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses (hereafter "Town Board") finds it necessary to repeal in its entirety the current Ulysses Zoning Law adopted by Local Law Number 3 of 2013 and amended from time, to time, and codified as Chapter 212 of the Laws of the Town of Ulysses and its place to adopt a new Zoning Law; and WHEREAS, The Town Board has determined that the action is a Type I action under 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and on October 22, 2019 declared itself Lead Agency for the purpose of conducting an uncoordinated environmental review in connection with approval by the Town; and WHEREAS, The Town of Ulysses Planning Board and Zoning Update Steering Committee reviewed the draft local law at the request of the Town Board; and WHEREAS, the Town Board is the only agency charged with taking action in connection with the adoption of this Local Law, which action is purely legislative in nature; and WHEREAS, The Town Board of the Town of Ulysses, acting as the Lead agency in its uncoordinated environmental review in accordance with Article 8 of SEQRA, thoroughly reviewed the Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF"), Parts I and 2, and the Impact Analysis of the Proposed Zoning Amendments, including the findings noted therein (which findings are incorporated herein as if set forth at length -see appendix), and any and all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action and its environmental review, and thoroughly analyzed the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR §617.7(c), and (iii) completed the EAF, Part 3; and WHEREAS, the Town Board has compared the proposed action with the criteria for determining significance in SEQRA 6 NYCRR 617.7; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses, based upon its thorough review of the EAF, Parts 1 and 2, and the Impact Analysis of the Proposed Zoning Amendments, including the findings noted therein (which findings are incorporated herein as if set forth at length), and any and all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action, and in comparison with the Criteria for Determining Significance found at 6 NYCRR Part 617.7, hereby makes a negative declaration of environmental significance ("Negative Declaration") in 4 accordance with SEAR for the above referenced proposed zoning amendments and that the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement is not required; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this determination is based on the following facts and conclusions: 1. Adoption of the Local Law will not result in any direct action or physical change to the environment. 2. Any changes to the environment that may occur from adoption of the Local Law would be indirect and result from future undertakings that would be permitted by the Local Law. 3. Adoption of the Local Law will reduce the density of residential development permitted in the Town and will likely preserve land, natural resources, and the viability of agricultural resources in the Town of Ulysses. Moved: Ms. Thomas Seconded: Mr. Boggs DISCUSSION: Mr. Goldman wants to make sure that adopting the SEQR will not have any unseen implications. Ms. Sokoni responded that it in no way indicates adoption of the zoning. Ms. Zahler wondered whether we are really reducing density as stated in #3. Ms. Thomas explained the accuracy of this. Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 Ms. Thomas reminded the board that due to the Tompkins County 239 review, 4 votes will be needed to adopt the zoning law. She reiterated that they will not be voting tonight due to lack of comfort from board members. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONTRACT WITH THE VILLAGE OF TRUMANSBURG RESOLUTION 2019-201: APPROVING THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONTRACT WITH THE VILLAGE OF TRUMANSBURG WHEREAS, a fire protection district known as "the Fire Protection District of the Towns of Ulysses, Hector and Covert" (hereafter referred to as "the Fire Protection District") has been duly established in the said towns; and 5 WHEREAS, the Fire Protection District encompasses the following territory in the Town of Ulysses: All of the Town of Ulysses, excepting the area within the limits of the incorporated Village of Trumansburg; and WHEREAS, the Village of Trumansburg (hereafter referred to as "the Village") maintains a volunteer fire department, with adequate and suitable apparatus, equipment and training for the furnishing of fire protection services within the Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, Town Law §184 permits a town to contract with a village which maintains adequate and suitable apparatus and appliances for the furnishing of fire protection services in such fire protection district; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to contract with the Village to provide fire protection services in the Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, a public hearing as required by §184 of the Town Law was duly advertised on October 25, 2019, and was held on November 12, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. at the Town of Ulysses Town Hall, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Town Board of the Town of Ulysses hereby approves and authorizes execution of the attached Agreement between the Village and the Town, whereby the Village will provide the Town with fire protection capable of responding to fire related and health related emergencies on an ongoing basis within the Fire Protection District, for the period from January 1, 2020 until December 31, 2020, and be it further RESOLVED that, pursuant to the Agreement, the Town shall pay the Village the sum of $231,759 for such services, on or before March 1, 2020; and be it further RESOLVED that, the Supervisor of the Town of Ulysses is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Town of Ulysses. Moved: Ms. Thomas Seconded: Mr. Goldman DISCUSSION: Ms. Zahler noted that this motion failed at the last meeting. She made an inquiry to the village as to better tracking of reserves, as discussed at the last meeting. It was suggested the joint municipalities meet early next year before the village budget to do this. Mr. Boggs thanked Ms. Zahler for her work. Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 NEW BUSINESS: ACKNOWLEDGING A NEW HIGHWAY EMPLOYEE Ms. Thomas noted that although the Town Board doesn't need to pass a resolution for this as the Highway Superintendent has authority to hire, but it is helpful for the record. RESOLUTION 2019-202: ACKNOWLEDGING A NEW HIGHWAY EMPLOYEE RESOLVED that the Ulysses Town Board understands that Highway Superintendent Scott Stewart has appointed Bill Austin as a laborer for the Highway Department with the goal of moving to Machine Equipment Operator (MEO) once he has the proper certifications or licenses, and further RESOLVED the Union Contract with the Highway Department indicates the pay for a new employee laborer without a Commercial Driver License (CDL) is $18.50 per hour. Moved: Ms. Thomas Seconded: Ms. Zahler Mr. Boggs made a friendly amendment to strike the first paragraph. This was seconded by Mr. Goldman. Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 DISCUSSION OF TOWN BOARD MEETING SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 24, 2019 RESOLUTION 2019---: TOWN BOARD MEETING OF DECEMBER 24, 2019 RESOLVED, that the Ulysses Town Board cancels the 4th Tuesday meeting of December in 2019. Moved: Ms. Thomas Seconded: Mr. Goldman The board did not vote at this time -see below. DESIGNATION OF A REPRESENTATIVE TO THE TOMPKINS COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2019-203: DESIGNATION OF A REPRESENTATIVE TO THE TOMPKINS COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 7 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses appoints Cait Darfler to be the Town's representative to the Tompkins County Environmental Management Council (EMC) for 2020, and further RESOLVED the Town Board appreciates Cait Darfler service to the Town and County as the current representative to the EMC. Moved: Ms. Thomas Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 Seconded: Ms. Zahler DISCUSSION OF TOWN BOARD MEETING SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 24, 2019 RESOLUTION 2019-204: TOWN BOARD MEETING OF DECEMBER 24, 2019 RESOLVED, that the Ulysses Town Board cancels the 4th Tuesday meeting of December in 2019 and reschedules it for Dec. 16, 2019 at 7:30pm. Moved: Ms. Thomas Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 Seconded: Mr. Goldman APPOINTMENT OF SEARCH COMMITTEE MEMBER FOR RECREATION DIRECTOR RESOLUTION 2019-205: APPOINTMENT OF SEARCH COMMITTEE MEMBER FOR RECREATION DIRECTOR Whereas, the Ulysses Town Board seeks to have a broad -based group of community stakeholders advising the Town on the appointment of a new Recreation Director and Whereas, the Trumansburg Conservatory of Fine Arts has identified their representative for the Search Committee created on November 12, 2019, now therefore it RESOLVED, that Mark Costa is appointed to the Recreation Director Search Committee as the representative for the Trumansburg Conservatory of Fine Arts. Moved: Ms. Zahler Seconded: Mr. Boggs Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 SETTING THE 2020 ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING DATE RESOLUTION 2019-206: SET 2020 ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING DATE BE IT RESOLVED that the Ulysses Town Board sets the date for the Organizational Meeting on January 6, 2020 at 8am at the Ulysses Town Hall. Moved: Ms. Thomas Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 Seconded: Mr. Goldman AUTHORIZATION TO MOVE FORWARD ON ASSET DATABASE DEVELOPMENT Ms. Wright gave a brief overview of the project, which includes creation of a database to help manage town assets. Ms. Zahler asked about funding. Ms. Thomas replied that funds were budgeted for GASB compliance. Ms. Wright said that per the State Comptroller's Office, the town can use capital reserves on this if it chooses. RESOLUTION 2019-207: AUTHORIZATION TO MOVE FORWARD ON ASSET DATABASE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS the Ulysses Town Board has made it a priority to become GASB compliant as it pertains to Town asset valuation, documentation and data management; and WHEREAS a database to manage Town asset data has been identified as the preferred method; and WHEREAS a custom built database will allow for the Town to maximize usability while providing the opportunity to design the database in a way that matches the day to day, E monthly, and annual operations that would be required to maintain the relevance of data in the database; and WHEREAS an online database provides maximum access and usability in a teamwork setting; and WHEREAS Pushlar Consulting is already in contract with the Town for "Ongoing web and database development" and has maintained a well -established professional relationship with the Town; and WHEREAS Pushlar Consulting has quoted the Town for database design and development at 40 hours of work at the contract rate of $80/hour for a maximum total of $3,200; and WHEREAS there will be two annual expenses pertaining to this database: a SSL certificate and a website hosting cost totally $200 for both; and WHEREAS billing for this work will be in the 2020 budget year; Therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Board authorizes Town staff, in collaboration with Pushlar Consulting, to move forward with the development of a Town asset database, for a maximum total of $3,200. Moved: Ms. Thomas Seconded: Mr. Boggs DISCUSSION: Mr. Boggs asked for more information. Ms. Wright replied that the program will be web - based. Mr. Boggs and Zahler suggested being sure that Mr. Pushlar designs it so that it could be passed along to someone else if necessary. Mr. Boggs suggested making an outline to streamline the process to make sure that the program will provide the data that we are looking for. Ms. Wright explained that the data fields will be based on the information needed. Ms. Zahler inquired whether NYS provides guidance on this. Ms. Wright said no. Ms. Thomas explained that this will be a central location for all of the town's many assets lists. Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR: 10 Mr. Houghton expressed concern regarding passage of the SEAR before the local law is in place. He feels that the town is setting the regulations that have a direct impact on what is allowed in the town and the environment. Ms. Sokoni weighed in that the board may have to go through the SEAR again if certain changes made. The only action taken by passing a law is legislative. If the law is passed and someone wants to build a CAFO, a SEQR will be needed on that. Ms. Marino expressed that she shares Ms. Wright's enthusiasm for new database and becoming GASB compliant. She responded to Mr. Goldman's comment regarding passing the zoning law with a one year delay on subdivision regulations. She reminded the board that a straw poll was taken and 3 board members were not in support of this concept. Neither were the Planning Board or the Zoning Officer. Many changes were made but the board chose to dismiss the subdivision regulations even though 2.5 years of thought were put into it. She believes that they have strayed from the goals of the grant that funded the zoning update. MONTHLY BUSINESS: APPROVAL OF MINUTES RESOLUTION 2019-208: APPROVAL OF MINUTES RESOLVED that the Ulysses Town Board approves the minutes from both the public hearing and regular meeting on 11/12. Moved: Ms. Zahler Seconded: Mr. Goldman Ms. Thomas aye Ms. Zahler aye Mr. Hertzler absent Mr. Boggs aye Mr. Goldman aye Vote: 4-0 Date Adopted: 11/26/19 EXECUTIVE SESSION: Mr. Goldman made a motion to go into Executive Session at 9:17pm to discuss the promotion, performance and compensation of a specific individual and the advice of counsel. This was seconded by Ms. Zahler and passed unanimously. Mr. Goldman made a motion to end Executive Session at 9:55pm. This was seconded by Mr. Boggs. ADJOURN: Mr. Goldman moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:55pm. This was seconded by Mr. Boggs and passed unanimously. 11 Respectfully Submitted by Carissa Parlato, 12/5/19 12 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part I - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either "Yes" or "No". If the answer to the initial question is "Yes", complete the sub -questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is "No", proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Town of Ulysses Zoning Code Amendments Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Town of Ulysses, Tompkins County, NY Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): The Town of Ulysses is proposing to repeal its existing zoning code and replace it with the adoption of a newly amended draft zoning code. Changes include the creation of an Agriculture/Residential Zone and Rural Residence Zone, which replace zones formerly known as Al - Agricultural District, R1 - Rural Residence District and R2 - Moderate Density Residence District. Other changes include the creation of design guidelines in the Jacksonville Hamlet and the creation of the Office, Technology, and Mixed Use District, as well as increased buffers from streams and wetlands. Draft zoning map attached. The adoption of this code is in response to the recommendations of the Town's Comprehensive Plan and Agriculture and Farmland Protection Plan to make zoning amendments to preserve agricultural lands in the Town. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: (607) 387-5767 Town of Ulysses Town Board E -Mail: Address: 10 Elm Street City/PO: Trumansburg State: NY Zip Code: 14886 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: 607-387-9778 John Zepko - Environmental Planner E -Mail: zepko@ulysses.ny.us Address: 10 Elm Street City/PO: State: Zip Code: Trumansburg NY 14886 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E -Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. ("Funding" includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Counsel, Town Board, ®Yes❑No Adoption of zoning code - Ulysses Town Board November 2019 or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village ❑YesmNo Planning Board or Commission c. City, Town or ❑Yes®No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies ❑Yes®No e. County agencies ®Yes❑No Tompkins County 239 November 2019 f. Regional agencies ❑Yes®No g. State agencies ❑Yes®No h. Federal agencies ❑Yes®No i. Coastal Resources. I. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ❑Yes ZINo ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ❑ Yes®No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑ Yes®No C. Planning and Zoning C.I. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. • If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part I ®Yes❑No C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action would be located? ®Yes❑No ❑Yes®No b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): Cayuga Lake Watershed Revitalization Plan - 2004 ❑Yes❑No c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): Town of Ulysses Agriculture and Farmland Preservation Plan - 2013 ®Yes❑No Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? Project is the adoption of a new zoning code to be applied Town wide b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ❑Yes®No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ®Yes❑No If Yes, L What is the proposed new zoning for the site? Project is the adoption of a new zoning code to be applied Town wide C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? Trumansburq School District b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Tompkins County Sheriff: Village of Trumansburq Police c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Trumansburq Volunteer Fire ; Trumansburq/Covert amulance d. What parks serve the project site? Taughannock Falls State Park Smith Woods Cayuga Nature Center D. Project Details D.I. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? 0 Yes❑ No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % Units: d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, L Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes ❑No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? 0 Yes❑No I. If No, anticipated period of construction: months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase I (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 f. Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes❑No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family four or JJQ) Initial Phase At completion of all phases g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? ❑Yes❑No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; and length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes ❑No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: ❑ Ground water ❑ Surface water streams ❑Other specify: iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons; surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? ❑Yes❑No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? W. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? OVesONo If yes, describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment ❑Yes❑No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 U. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Dyes ❑No If Yes, describe: iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑ Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes: L Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? • Is the project site in the existing district? • Is expansion of the district needed? • Do existing lines serve the project site? iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? O Yes❑ No ❑ Yes❑ No ❑ Yes❑ No ❑ Yes❑ No ❑Yes ❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s) of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑ Yes❑No If, Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? • Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No ❑Yes ❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point ❑Yes❑No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non -point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or acres (impervious surface) Square feet or acres (parcel size) U. Describe types of new point sources. iiL Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on -site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on -site surface water or off -site surface waters)? • If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re -use stormwater? O Yes❑ No ❑ Yes❑ No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on -site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel Dyes ❑No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, Dyes ❑No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: I. Is the project site located in an Air quality non -attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ❑Yes ❑No ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: • Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) • Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) • Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) • Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) • Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) • Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, ❑Yes❑No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as ❑Yes❑No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑Yes❑No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): ❑ Morning ❑ Evening ❑Weekend ❑ Randomly between hours of to ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes ❑No V. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within % mile of the proposed site? ❑Yes❑ No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric ❑Yes❑No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand ❑Yes❑No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: it Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on -site combustion, on -site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation? ❑Yes❑No I. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: it During Operations: • Monday - Friday: • Monday - Friday: • Saturday: • Saturday: • Sunday: • Sunday: • Holidays: • Holidays: Page 7 of 13 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: ❑Yes❑No ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? Describe: ❑Yes❑No n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ❑Yes❑No ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? Describe: ❑Yes ❑No o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ❑Yes❑No p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g., month, year) iii. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities: ❑Yes ❑No q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ❑ Yes ❑No ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: L Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation : tons per (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on -site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: ❑ Yes ❑No • Operation: iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on -site: • Construction: • Operation: Page 8 of 13 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or • Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous ❑Yes❑No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on -site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? DYes0No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential (suburban) ❑ Rural (non -fame) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify): ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Covertype Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change (Acres +/-) • Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces • Forested • Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) • Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) • Non -vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) • Other Describe: Page 9 of 13 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑Yes❑No i. If Yes: explain: d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed ❑Yes❑No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: L Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: W. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑Yes❑ No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑ No • If yes, cite sources/documentation: ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes❑No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any ❑Yes❑ No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: I. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes — Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes — Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures: iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑Yes®No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 13 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes❑No • If yes, DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: feet e. Drainage status of project site soils:❑ Well Drained: of site _% ❑ Moderately Well Drained: % of site ❑ Poorly Drained % of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ❑ 0-10%: % of site ❑ 10-15%: _%of site ❑ 15% or greater: % of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ® Yes❑No If Yes, describe: Taughannock Falls State Park, Gravel Quarry - Taughannock Falls, Taughannock Park Road / Route 143A - Ulysses h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, ®Yes❑No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ®Yes❑No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, state or local agency? ®Yes❑No iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: • Streams: Name 898-367.1, 898-372, 898-378, 898-371, 698-365, ... Classification C(TS), C(T), B(T), AA(T) • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Federal Waters, NYS Wetland, Federal Waters, Fe... Approximate Size NYS Welland (in a... • Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) ME -1 TW-1 v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality -impaired ❑Yes J To waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes ❑No j. Is the project site in the 100 -year Floodplain? ❑Yes❑No k. Is the project site in the 500 -year Floodplain? ❑Yes ❑No I. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? ®Yes❑No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: Principal Aquifer Page II of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ®Yes ❑No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): Beech -Maple Mesic Forest, Calcareous Shoreline Outcrop, Shale Cliff and Talus Community, Hemlock -Northern Hardwood Forest ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: 30.0, 27.5, 112.98, 143.25 acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres • Gain or loss (indicate + or -): acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ® Yes❑No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? If Yes: i. Species and listing (endangered or threatened): Short -eared Owl, Yellow Mountain Saxifrage, Butterwort, Bird's Eye Primrose, Pinedrops, Bald Eagle, Lake Sturgeon p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of EYesINo special concern? If Yes: i. Species and listing: q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes❑No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ®Yes❑No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: TOMP002, SCHU001, SENE012 b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑Yes❑No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National ❑Yes®No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑ Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. CEA name: U. Basis for designation: iii. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district ® Yes❑ No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: ❑Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii. Name: Eligible property:Taughannock Farms Inn (current Inn at Taughannock), Eligible property:CAYUGA NATURE CENTER, Eligibl... iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ®Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local ❑Yes ❑No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: L Identify resource: it Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑ Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Elizabeth Thomas Title Town Supervisor PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, September 16, 2019 2:01 PM �y Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist --6v ----- ---GjQ4tk4-----' —•I Locke 7t „ project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental _�r1J1.1-1�F�?.t� assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 3roton the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to Lodi Covert ]1 e c a �� n y Groton DEC you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order ' I y to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a Lansing I4 substitute for agency determinations. t r I Ill• t \ Hwoo 0tla'i d'i_ano-aa�{ r•.In. Ul j ses • Tornpk,'ns `C U ty - �en ro a,i •o4OR ) Hectorc1 ti•i.h°riuyler o -�--J' "+ n u,rry Il Ith ' (ID t)zvat 90 tan K 'r r Enfield Sou a HEE,16ermin, USGS, ( CIevN Yul vro4ctenei r ) Inter e"pFl EOENT P NRCan, Esn f m I:aui N{ J @1iETII Esrl' hina (H g K i__), Esn , ,;,i soircejsn, HERE, Garman, ae EE�;j1.jJhsil�ellntlj,:3d,G. } t,elumbuc °Pittsburgh USGralltnt§i7MP, INCREMENT 4`E Newfield nSt tMapp n ll otcrs. a d FQ) t' ^ PINIlCen, EsriJapan, METI, athanne Ij Us Co Si , clnmh Wa,EW] bi ra jHong Kong), F ri B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] C.2.b. [Special Planning District] E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Potential Contamination History] E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Listed] E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Environmental Site Remediation Database] E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Name] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Classification] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Name] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Size] No No Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. No Yes Taughannock Falls State Park, Gravel Quarry - Taughannock Falls, Taughannock Park Road / Route 143A - Ulysses Yes Yes Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. 898 -367.1,898-372,898-378,898-371,898-365,898-369,898-373,898-380, 898-366,898-368,898-370,898-379,898-227,898-245,898-232 C(TS), C(T), B(T), AA(T) Federal Waters, NYS Wetland NYS Wetland (in acres):32.3, NYS Wetland (in acres):53.7 Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report ME -1. TW-1 E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - DEC Wetlands Number] E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] E.2.i. [Floodway] E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] E.2.1. [Aquifers] E.2.1. [Aquifer Names] E.2.n. [Natural Communities] E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Name] No Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. 'Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Yes Principal Aquifer Yes Beech -Maple Mesic Forest, Calcareous Shoreline Outcrop, Shale Cliff and Talus Community, Hemlock -Northern Hardwood Forest E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Acres] 30.0, 27.5, 112.98, 143.25 E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] Yes E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species - Short -eared Owl, Yellow Mountain Saxifrage, Butterwort, Bird's Eye Primrose, Name] Pinedrops, Bald Eagle, Lake Sturgeon E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] Yes E.3.a. [Agricultural District] TOMP002, SCH0001, SENE012 E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Yes - Digital mapping data for archaeological site boundaries are not Places or State Eligible Sites] available. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.e.ii [National or State Register of Historic Eligible property:Taughannock Farms Inn (current Inn at Taughannock), Places or State Eligible Sites - Name] Eligible property:CAYUGA NATURE CENTER, Eligible property:RESIDENCE, Eligible property:NON-CONTRIBUTING, Eligible property:REISDENCE, Eligible property: COMMERCIAL, Eligible property:TRUMANSBURG MASONIC TEMPLE, Eligible property:SAGE RESIDENCE, Eligible property:82 Main St., Trumansburg, Eligible property:RESIDENTIAL, Eligible property:RONGOVIAN EMBASSY, Eligible property:COMMERCIAL BLOCK, Eligible property:BARTO & CO. BANK BLDG/FINGER LAKES CORP ON E. MAIN, Eligible property:BARN & GAZEBO ON TRUMANSBURG RD., Eligible property:Trumansburg Home Telephone Bldg, Eligible property:TOMPKINS CO. TRUST CO., Eligible property:COMM/RESIDENTIAL, Eligible property: Session House, Eligible property:Former Village Offices & Police Station, Eligible property:BEAURGARD RES. (McLallen Hse B&B), Eligible property:Rongovian Embassy, Eligible property:NAPA AUTO PARTS --NON- CONTRIBUTING, Eligible property:Kosmos, Eligible property: LIBRARY --NON- CONTRIBUTING, Eligible property:8480 Iradell Rd , Eligible property:Non- contributing, Eligible property:613 Iradell Rd , Eligible property:7476 Iradell Rd , Eligible property:3031 Podunk Rd , Eligible property:TAUGHANNOCK FALLS STATE PARK SURVEY DISTRICT, Eligible property:CONCESSION STAND, Eligible property:LARGE COMFORT STATION, Eligible property:SIX CABINS, Eligible property:GORGE RD HOUSE, BARN, AND BLACKSMITH SHOP, Eligible property:PICNIC SHELTER, Eligible property:BATHHOUSE, Eligible property:REGIONAL DIRECTOR'S HOUSE, Eligible property:SMALL COMFORT STATION, Eligible property:BIN 3314400 Waterburg Road over Taughannock Creek, Camp, Hermon, House, First Presbyterian Church of Ulysses, Methodist Episcopal Church of Jacksonville, Second Baptist Society of Ulysses, Austin, William E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] Yes Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report E 3 i. [Designated River Corridor] 7No Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report Agency Use Only (If applicable] Fall En vironmental Assessment Form Project: Town of Ulysses 2019 Draft Zoning Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date: 19 Nov 2019 Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed projector action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer "Yes" to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer "No" to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box "Moderate to large impact may occur." • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub -questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the "whole action". • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, NO ❑ YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If "Yes ", answer questions a -j. If "No ", move on to Section 2. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d ❑ ❑ less than 3 feet. b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f 0 0 c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a ❑ ❑ generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a 0 0 of natural material. e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year Die 0 ❑ or in multiple phases. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q 0 ❑ disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. Bli ❑ 0 h. Other impacts: ❑ 0 Page 1 of 10 FEAF 2019 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, ® NO ❑ YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If "Yes ", answer questions a - c. If "No", move on to Section 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part! small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: E2g ❑ 0 b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c ❑ 0 registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: c. Other impacts: 0 ❑ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water NO EYES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If "Yes ", answer questions a -1. If "No ", move on to Section 4. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, Dlh 0 0 b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b ❑ 0 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a 0 ❑ from a wetland or water body. d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h ❑ 0 tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, D2a, D2h 0 0 runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c ❑ ❑ of water from surface water. g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge D2d 0 0 of wastewater to surface water(s). h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e ❑ 0 stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h 0 ❑ downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h ❑ ❑ around any water body. k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, DI a, D2d 0 0 wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 1. Other impacts: ❑ J❑ 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or ZNO ❑ YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If "Yes ", answer questions a - It. If "No ", move on to Section 5. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand D2c 0 0 on supplies from existing water supply wells. b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c 0 0 withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and Dla, D2c 0 0 sewer services. d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E21 0 0 e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, Elf, ❑ 0 where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Elg, Elh f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p, E21 0 0 over ground water or an aquifer. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h, D2q, ❑ ❑ feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E21, D2c h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. O NO ❑ YES (See Part 1. E.2) If "Yes ", answer questions a - g. If "No ", move on to Section 6. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. Eli ❑ 0 b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j 0 0 c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k 0 0 d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e 0 ❑ patterns. e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, 0 0 E2j, E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, Ele 0 ❑ or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 g. Other impacts: 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. W]NO ❑ YES (See Part 1. D.2.f, D.2.h, D.2.g) If "Yes ", answer questions a -f If "No ", move on to Section 7. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g ❑ ❑ ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N2O) D2g 0 ❑ iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g 0 ❑ iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) D2g ❑ ❑ ❑ v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g ❑ hydrochloroflourocarbons (FIFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g ❑ ❑ hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions D2f, D2g ❑ 0 rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in "a" through "c", D2g ❑ ❑ above. e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s ❑ ❑ ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts: 0 0 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m. -q.) JNO DYES If "Yes ", answer questions a - j. If "No ", move on to Section 8. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o 0 ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o ❑ ❑ any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p 0 ❑ species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p 0 0 any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to supportthe biological community it was established to protect. E3c D ❑ f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: E2n 0 0 g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over -wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. E2m 0 ❑ h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: Elb ❑ ❑ i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D2q ❑ 0 j. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) WINO DYES If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", move on to Section 9. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b 0 0 NYS Land Classification S stem. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela, Elb ❑ ❑ (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b 0 0 active agricultural land. d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural E I b, E3a ❑ 0 uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, Elb ❑ 0 management system. f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2c, C3, ❑ ❑ potential or pressure on farmland. D2c, D2d g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c 0 0 Protection Plan. h. Other impacts: 0 0 Page 5 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in WINO ❑YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.l.b, E.3.h.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - g. If "No ", go to Section 10. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h ❑ ❑ scenic or aesthetic resource. b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b ❑ 0 screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑ ❑ ii. Year round ❑ ❑ d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is: E2q, i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ii. Recreational or tourism based activities Etc ❑ ❑ e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h ❑ 0 appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed Dla, Ela, 0 0 project: D l f, Dig 0-1/2 mile 'A-3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological NO ❑ YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - e. If "No ", go to Section 11, Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact _inaynccnn impact may occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on the National or E3e 0 0 State Register of Historical Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f ❑ ❑ to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g ❑ ❑ to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: Page 6 of 10 d. Other impacts: 0 0 If any of the above (a -d) are answered "Moderate to large impact may C. occur", continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, 0 0 of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or E3e, E3f, ❑ ❑ integrity. E3g, Ela, Elb iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e, E3f, ❑ ❑ are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h, C2, C3 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a �NO ❑ YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - e. If "No ", go to Section 12. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or "ecosystem D2e, Elb ❑ 0 services", provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E2o, E2n, E2 b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, Elc, 0 ❑ C2c, E2 c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c 0 ❑ with few such resources. Etc, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, Elc ❑ 0 community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical NO YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If "Yes ", answer questions a - c. If "No ", go to Section 13. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d 0 0 characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c. Other impacts: 0 ❑ Page 7 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. ❑✓ NO ❑ YES (See Part 1. D.2.j) If "Yes ", answer questions a -f If "No ", go to Section 14. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j ❑ ❑ more vehicles. c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j ❑ ❑ e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j 0 ❑ f. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. NO ❑ YES (See Part 1. D.2.k) If "Yes ", answer questions a - e. If "No ", go to Section 15. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k 0 0 b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission Dlf, 0 ❑ or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a Dlq, D2k commercial or industrial use. c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MNhrs per year of electricity. D2k ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square Dig ❑ ❑ feet of building area when completed. e. Other Impacts: 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. NO ❑YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - f If "No ", go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ❑ ❑ regulation. b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, Eld ❑ 0 hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o ❑ ❑ Page 8 of 10 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n 0 ❑ e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky -glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, Ela ❑ ❑ f. Other impacts: ❑ 0 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure © NO ❑ YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - m. If "No", go to Section 17. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day Eld ❑ ❑ care center, rou home, nursin home or retirement community. . b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg, Elh 0 ❑ c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site Elg, Elh ❑ 0 remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the E1g, Elh 0 ❑ property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg, Elh 0 ❑ to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t ❑ ❑ generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, Elf 0 ❑ management facility. h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, Elf 0 0 i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s 0 0 solid waste. j. The proposed action may result in excavation-or-other-disturbanee—within-2000-feet-of -1-f 1-g— ❑ ❑ a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf, Elg 0 ❑ site to adjacent off site structures. 1. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s, Elf, ❑ ❑ project site. D2r m. Other impacts: Page 9 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. NO YES (See Part 1. Cl, C.2. and C.3.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", go to Section 18. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action's land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, Dla ❑ 0 contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). Ela, Elb b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 0 ❑ in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 0 0 plans. e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, Dlc, 0 ❑ supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. Did, DI£, Did, Elb f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4, D2c, D2d ❑ ❑ that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a 0 ❑ commercial development not included in the proposed action) h. Other: 0 0 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. QNO DYES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If "Yes", answer questions a - g. If "No ", proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas E3e, E3f, E3g 0 ❑ of historic importance to the community. b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 ❑ ❑ schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, Dlf ❑ ❑ there is a shortage of such housing. Dig, Ela d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 0 ❑ or designated public resources. e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 0 0 character. f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 0 0 Ela, Elb E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10 E 4.i C Cr E C O C W co C m a In C) In c O E C E v 0 W 9 a Y aC C o '2 to � N L 01 Y p,l '30 W N cam a o C 0'4-' u Y Y U m Y U U 0 ✓ o O O a v m cc 0t ` av • C O C C u m Y E N ✓ M m U C C U m 0 U CC C U CC d YO -0 a C N a O O. o E 0 .Y •� C I- m E v E o Y 0 C O C m 'O C .O N E N a) E w > v J v E N am+ N N E O. cu o o C Y CU o o 0 0 CU E 0 E w 0 = c 0 E Ci 0 E 5 '> O -O '> O' 0 'y, '> 50v s > O v m C a �r T C O O m C a C .r a T 0 C v Y v E > Y G m tla J 6 C m m ¢a N '- m m J O' C N m J C by O' a) c E N - E v Y C v c v � C O m C 0 C O m O C U) z 3 N z . a m z 3 N z 3 N Y o w a u E O C E N C O a E o -O N C O O C h v C) C u 0 a C C m al F m o ¢ U E a u -.w ai c a M ai m 3 m y O h0 > O a.. L „In (0 N m O N C m L H m N O C Ot Invm o m C c c N m o v v 0 .c 4 o m v 0 u aL+ ,n a ti t v- E Q CO (0` j, C_ Y G (04-j "t a m. ++ n C ii N m v > aj C O C u > 4 O 'C m In CC C J > a C E C N 9 .0 Ot C u .o CC E E a v 0 m C) w o w m 3 E H N F- N L m 3 Val Val V1 LL a C N T 0U C E v m C m Co F c 9E 3 v m00a v m b04-' E o •� E v c.c m ii w o m a z— J'i m> v c'N" a) C COam v a c 3 E° o o m c u c m O m O m amt. -c° c a) m '^ m ° a Z.L. E '= E u +`• o 0 'o +j tcou v 0 v c v u a C) In v .xYmN O Y U a) O N of C �',o0O'>mmv m W v O N U C °iLv, 0"" ° 0)O -C - E v w 0In m v m C C NJ T — C J m U o v CO 0v ° N m L v U m c c . E o c a w a a c J v c E r E C) S m d 0 0 m v m F ami T ,. C 3 v J a O v v O J v a) m V E h H E 0 0 'O V J m 'N 00 'L am+ v> O m > y0 N m o C u a v a 3 8 y a a Q v �' n`o c t,0 0u of N N N N ey ci N e-i O N N � y. Oj L N N O '� n N o m u U U C i E N (p Y b0 a a a ° 0 a E E E E c 3 0 z m m C UI 10 T E E a W N N a 00 C +' W 0 C c C 0 O O O E °5 N > C O '> '> ci W O> c W w 3 m N N N W x (0 (0 N ° N m C L O° Ol Ci N N > O 9 = c O 0 O w a v°i ac a Z Z Z 'SW v N c a v > '(0 UI 0 u ° C C L N =� -O W N C Ci Ol Y O N N v j C E d 0. 10 a H OQ 0> 01 UI O m E O T b0 d C N0 U Op Ol w aL+ C C .Ci `° n C : C O a bu a ? O bU O —.. O WO N -°O Ci E` Et '° u v `m N c m W e o m ° (0 L 3 Y O C J E U 0 O bD N (6 N L W N (0 L 4r U C t C `! N E C 4. r t ,ti c y Y 0 L 2 E° No a o m 0 E O 3 -o b° v O F O O rio N N cuts. N C w E b0 Ci y` o v w o O ` E uO J Y E O (0 n n C t+ a N O O UI C N - E O. N O. d a° 0 N C v O! d 04 L L .O ry 0) Ol WOC 0 ry v1 L .C bO .. 1- (n 3 m N E o ti F- D N H*. Cot da v O1 OJ h o .C c m m 01 (0 _(0 (0 vUi O to_C E O) y 'E E .� C m y 01 c y 01 C O ry E w O w O o v a o v (0OO -_ T O v N 0( E N C w (0C w J yO. bo 01 U 5 J bym'L. N O) E bQ (0 cv (0 oU J 3 m 3 N o o-° O a N F a v O 3 m m e C u N f0 J u fl _C L n Y L [ b0 ° Ol a' o° -St fl H C Y vUi C a+ t6 c D N 'C X C° C c •c (00 (04C m a .N W Q N W ? v O LL D N? 0 C C° C L C C L C L •c,'_ N 01 F v( d O) 3 C° O) 3 N y Y C C N O '-' 0 N o v ° w L'' m o >.- L a w v u m= y c E 2 C)O. WW O! C)O.WC) Ol WC '-2 O u (0 N C O1 T O1 O O. O O j a O (+- E aL. Qi 4 o N 1+ o N o c n = Y c es- O 4UI c a N o `o n av E U —' 1 Y u m v v -f0 3 on O U C W D.0O (0 N . u C W O W (0 N .t u N d W D-°'° Do (0 (0 .O u N M rl ci 'i N N N N U U Y to ° ¢ U CO a to a CO a a, u L E V1 C C N O E 3 u a u 0. u O. o c O to ° U a ° a ° a ° O a= v a W C 0 C N C C H m° -° -O Y E 1>0 C C C C T C C N w a C N N _ "O O m E E E E E E E ¢ O J m ' C a C >+ N D VI O y G J v w v v v w c O).to C z E Y n ¢ ¢ O N a O Y C to N m N to N C O t z Q z Q v 5E Y w cv m m E C O Y C t LL w +O' 'ii J w CO a v v 0. N G u 3 uOk-to a'oaa ac! E o- m 0)4 aU 0 L a J C0 C —°, N o 0) 0) V '^ > Oa C v C run j N U y N Y (O C v C4- to C C JO v M N N O >+ m y ai > 0 m c w m 0 0 N N 0 tooO 0 O d W U/ C a° E°-2 p C N -O C (p !a N NJ J w = O C N O O a C m o N Q> v v v m 9.O o f O E r`o a c m !o Y _D v o 4.4 O o v c -.-CC- 0 H W N '4 N `~ C O 0oj a E J C -O n 44 'c E E' vJ C a+ o o a, two w Jn a` a u ° ° _ 1- o m `v 'o c°0) o m Y N U L t0 Y ,c m c ° s o J O C 'V L d N v V N . c v ¢ c C= L. E c CuLL O N d m> _O N C j dj w v O C a1 y v (O u n Y N O O N v Y °° Y Y C O .O N N Na U U C O N O 0) C N O 'Q OOOC C O C O S d i O L N m " N Q V l0 C C i 'N Q v Q J U O L4 0 w a C m N 0 0 a Jc o Cu a J J¢ o c Y w—°2 a s « v E w a, 01 U y Q1 O J L° ¢ C N J YYO J E U¢ Y to to N a O a !0 C N C N C a, « N ° a, n 0 to n V LI N d U= N C A T uu °- E E ° > ou > w v v v n ro m Q¢$ o v v o m u -O 5 rco a .n 2 m u m N N N M L 3 0 o4c Y U t Y u u 2 U u u O 4 c m n m n= m a m n m 0.2 U J E E o E E E z E ° L C C C C C V E E0,E E E LY CO C 0 m 0 0 O C ° C U) CC) N° C N C W C N .N X > C N N > 0n > C N > U) > N N UL. VI E c w GO 04 DD bat Y mu Q o C) N N Q) C m C c c C m C C C 3 o o v 0 o OS.. o w z z z z z z a 8 ci N0 v ° m .4-_I C X d J O vmi W N -' L 4_N N L U N m d C 'NO L N _T J U) 0 N N E aT+ T t J C Y a+ E `M m C Y Y o s Y -°'n E 3 0 o v c E E m m C u Cc. E o u C)W>- v OE o E U C O v C N W O J Y O y i N N >O 1y C C L N N a Y a L a O N N N 4 C C OD N w E b0 Eca J L 3 v O C C O G --(0b00, C .r20 O O `) F U y "O O m a 'N T 3 L C Y m > W C J W Y U) ° 0) O O bd `� u N C C T C J N O L a+ O C Y C cuW: +' m .� N 4 c u a m 4-1= u m v N vl E )n N o v C m U) O` E E cu L a O C v m U E a. m � . E o 'N N@ m U) otJ ��$ u a o n N y m -.007� m vu m u o 41 ` N N xN - W I i c 3 ry c v v O 0- w z 0C) UI J U N Y« m c 3 N N a n 'o _o > s V) CCC `o coCC) (0 Q +0, L Q) w v) v m z m o O E N EE 0>0- o °- w c bo —O n O J- 3 a. L> N O O C N O N N N N 2 C m Y Q v d C m L>> 0� Z CC a N N = a N` h N U OU o N L m ' U J m C v m m E w O U m O 3 ≤ J h0 Y Q O a o v a" a m ° C N J m ii 01 " �' t'i z b ) E .e'n5 m m noo = � v v E C m O C fO C -° L C) t^ a °- n U C C L C Y O O0 O QC) In•= 'ncu m t+i U y ' Nm b N b0 > U a n C)+'' m w.99 .9 m 'U m ' s_ C m C X m J C N O m bCo Y 0) m c CC) a0 m J a L c YVLi m N J o. E° z N J > J tEa.N E a v a N o E x a o a v u 3 a a m `O ¢ x u° x o a -010 U a N N N %\ %} 2\( am fj§ § 2 §)$ }\� C \/ \\ k \\/j \k\ \k \ &\© r \)\} f\{Ca) {}/ — \jj)\ (}3 `/0 /)3: \ o )}\\/ aD {\[) »;3% -2_ 2 [)t§ k k\)} )j/\\ )j\\\\ )\j\ /2 () { 0)/\o } « \{ \\ C \\ C j\ U \\ \j O O C 0n (n .C ' C O m a a O C m "O U `! O Y 2 o O L L O O v m L u C O u u O N'� -p mu Y a'H U U U '^ Y v " p O a U U1 _ c - a n `"° a tl0' L o E 3 E E a E a E c o o c o E v o C C _o 00 C �, o m m m y > a m U C CO CO L �b m w °O m m a E E C E C v tn Q C CO c m V 3 '' } C c O O'O 2-u (0 -OUZO m 3 + c N c N c'—° O E v m a L r D Y m C > Ew Q t oa v Z N m @ w N 'm^ N v H b0 > cc „m O Y Z -mo O O vi O E ¢ v m Do O T N w Z Z a Z a u E aL+ BE v E t u C C N OD �n `1 m UI -b C J m E on m v v u E �n Cr m v m o E Y a « LL m L o Y O> N c N -p v E O E L V N Y m m -O w a O O m too,o OO a o a a c o v> N o v vE ti Y v^' 3 v- v c ti v v 3 0 po•u u° m u L N Con, C L O O y OO C a a c° 0r0 d N a v O a N m u 41 a J 0J N LL DO o0 (•'J t d N CC N m N Cu C 9 O Z u E }' J W m pq C 6 OLL o .E u V Ul o N O J C m VI a O o a- a w — Y N d p Z L N LL m U1 ¢ Ofl N Cu C' 3 DUO) J a ` � z c v 0 o CUO v a2 v w CI H≤ Z u v .p o H $_ E a C s p m 3 Lp. E -n DO - 9 y cw v h0 y uc m a = E v o c Do v .s. 5o c DC54 O -u `'� f V L c v u m m p >, o c m o n m v o« a 0 LL O m W L O N m c .in N L v� j n j u t O U 0. n w L N E a N v d d" .r E t N w v o c m L m----'3o.O ps C p E > Cu .... w 00 Y N y • y w E V m `� v y z LL °'o o o 0 O O a u 'O J K O Co DCU C O o L^ o f c o C c> C c E >- ' ` V J O ~ N E v o a m '3 3 E °' 3' a w> , ->n m a n o a ° O v >• w CCWF o o. vpi a o « n iF Oro. ., .. vpi 00-00 o m N N N N N O V V a C) v v v a c v L �C0 m Ow C v CO O 'o OLL C LOX uL-. d c w21 m u O N ry o tLo WUv E L fu w a v a-'4 E r ya U a n ≥ N 41 Q N Qf (U y L O v 20 C CL.. �. N N E a� WC O E N O a 0 O E v o C'C m'vfl N Y¢ > v (O C a y N 10 ~ O O cc L (0 O N W N m 0 C C 0. 00 w e av, Cc CO U 3">> c W C ai C o fo 2-c' N a u z v -,� .v, o m o G N E 2 m c '> o c c° o..c D4-'0 'Si O > wo y v v N a (0 o ? > o N fU N L _ Y W v a+ L v W fo 3 c ,vn D Y c z a U (a 3 c Z w O v J Q 0 f0 W C) >- 'N w!.. a O O 'Si N N N RI 2a V- G L Y 7 v vvi fO z tO C) CO � 3 C) c v N'v y VI a c a s m 3 v w e is v '—J' Q E Y J a C..-. D a 'I c Q N O C,ro J !n C o o a LL Q v a Y E m E C is c y ro c O E N OE n E C) v E v a 3 Ofl a C G c Cu J w N c J m c t E O y J N.C +' O v. E 9v Ea E6 $ , Q E N o v c .`°c o E C E v v v u c. 0 E E Y 3 EEtJv c 0 v o Q Y E �° " a N Cl p ≥ c 'm OF (n vvi vu a E v n c n v u o J Qa a DC V1 o c w a c o J U J a J o « ._ 00- v 0 O fi a v E 0' w>u Q v E E E w V U F a O a H v Q `n ^ 3 8 0 c U SN Bbl Vi fT J CL a 0V 0. L Y V y= E N D 0 O D V1 U a p .' Q a o a OC y O N L J E l E w C > ... N a 3 $ 0 o a n 1 N O c N w 0 3 E N> wZ C y c 0 0 fo OU V W O LL OE a°5 V N❑ N N O �' c v o w as o c a v � o Ea N v d J v a a v E v o 0-4-U) Q N G y `C OW OED lei -O a U' w V O Co.-. W Q 0 N 0 3 w O 0 9 6 _ Ca as N N Q w a v ¢ o C N C a 4 C m E E a g v w c 3 E v m Co 0000 0> Ln 0 u c F t m y• a, E v« m y. 6 E w c c u v L p C A m N L O ma m n a 000 c Z C O a « ry a O• F u E y E c o Co m m v E c _ y— ac EE 0 CO c J O OS L O o N J o a o m « o U Y j =0 u m O U Q E c a m u c 4+ a m a C ` m m UI0. 00 w m 2 o m� m E c E'> aEa m' Com E Q v E 0) a 3 c 4-.0. ^ w en - 3 a N m o O m m C > C U C ;C N O a N !� > / U C U! s O m E a c 3 Y `° c 3 t m E a c 0 c x v °X' 0 a f° u N E O C C v J Ul E J o« C C w z 1- 0 M o- z F w y m = E m m a N A m C p N L a C C J ,O I . w m E m v w :Y Y c c N O c i 103 con Z m O w �n w a ai co_ y ui m m S` N d v Im o °° C a 0 E o N $ u +L' E S v w 3 mm 1uC n E mm o,E O N'n O A c p V m X N m m m E O o 3 O u C CD w w 0 22 EE Na m« a m uC <<2 c 1- m c L c c •0 K m O CO U C co zapO c ._ 3 wa v c v o a EN ca m N« - N w u c 0 3 v w '° p O L U h0 in -O d O) O O to.04g5 N yo U d m c 3 -flO) o .c m E 9 3 m v y v v c c a 'i io 100. c m y u o N v W o E �? W .a U a u J O C c a (O U .� O m C .� y cOa m Q CO Z U M u J O D a; Y N US a C Ect O N Q o Yi v E a O m= o u mOt a m o o vOO c E$ U O N v C O N O Q o 0 y Y Y Y O. O O) a v 3 M in 0004 U o 0.5 y aL+ o 3 c u `0. 0 J Ory u v Z « O)` O_ u E U L. C O N F F u I- N 0 00-0-ctcc a= o woo o° F LCOmmOm i- J 3 Q o Q C0 -v_3 QC a LOCO LCDD Lm m H O O u m I- L l m m H O N N F m ` > W ry m =v S . a 0 W U m 0 c a O m �_ w a v y n•y a y c m o Y E g c y y n o x m N E C "C0 U 0' a m N J E O 01 W 6 Ol O m a c 0 .LL5 L ' C C o X a C O P-i m U J a Q o E' O .t m \ r m m 05I-00 n 3 E> O C E o v E c o O) �;° _ O E y m LL '� m o. N E aE C O C y= J l m H C Y Y O J U °' .n is E O m v y S o ` °' J o E o Z '- oo20 m w w J H E≤ C m 100 E V m C N Q s ao 0=36 w v .n 0a o X w a 000 CO Vt a s m a . L F- N S LL F Q O O O O O x x x x x to. to. O 6 O. to. Co. Co. Co. Co.c Co. 0U_ U1 LL Ql LL 0U_ W LL a Q a¢ 0. Q 0. Q a Q <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 C E 0 .5 0 > C J m m ` o a a a U U U O m m m a n a ° E E E , m m m a u C C C 6 0 E 0 E 0 E C c c W N t. O 0 0 C C C C Z a cW ry ≥ ≥ ≥ Z o N 0 N O N 0 W > a C C C a o 0 0 W Z Z Z N O 00 C m C « O0 y C 3 o .a L W °1 a N > >'5V C J 0 K O O C a C o W.0 m C V y N J C C a m c y v a Jbo E v 0 v C >i C `' 0 C J b .. N m T C 4i a v` v N0) N 000— N 0.C 0 C c c c C J b0E5 N V O D V o m C w 6 Q 0 a m m v v E w> rl a, Z u d C J m C° O -0 ry 0 N 00- Nvvm 00 0 V A z J C O •X I- 3 •o C ` <0-00 C a L h0 F- a 00 y0 L y a N C .90 U $ 'm a v 0 °' 0" C C2 0 m a « mE °. wa caw E o o c o .� '0 0 0 o0 r= w 9 t yE 0 c w '0 > m•io m 0 v J y v o a 0 " my 'a E C v Q >9 0 o J : h 0 y -ma c b0 Co a0 U > 'O 90 0 00 N N w C v O m q N y a E≤ Ol N Ol V a LL 0 w 9 I- ry N o o m y w w a Q O v 10 m C 0 « o a N a to .o c a v C r v v 10 aoo O C d O N >. N 0 0 J O Ju . 4 0 0 a E 0 a 0 x x x C a a s C a C0- C0- CO. U) W W a C s a C Q ac CO < 0 ¢ o FmjecL /. r ✓ cCvr 7afq Date: I ,o w .i 7e/O Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets, as needed. See attached resolution and documentation Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: © Type 1 El Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: ❑✓ Part 1 © Part 2 © Part 3 FEAF 2019 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the as lead agency that: © A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. ❑ B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.7(d)). El C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: Town of Ulysses 2019 Zoning Codew Name of Lead Agency: Town of Ulysses Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Elizabeth Thomas Title of Responsible Officer: Town Supervisor Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Date: /, ° 7/f For For Further Information: Contact Person: John Zepko Address: 10 Elm Street, Trumansburg, NY 14886 Telephone Number: 607-387-9778 E-mail: zepko@ulysses.ny.us For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.ny.pov/enb/enb.html PRINT FULL FORM Page 2 of 2